Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuill. (Bb), a fungal pathogen of the Colorado potato beetle has been used to control CPB in Europe. Preliminary studies in the United States gave promising results for CPB control by using the fungus. Based on these studies, a three-year pilot program was initiated to evaluate the potential for using Bb o control the Colorado potato beetle in the U.S. We report herein on the results obtained in southern Maine from using this mycoinsecticide to control the beetle.https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin/1064/thumbnail.jp

Dill, J. F.

Storch, R. H.

English

University of Maine

The University of MaineDigitalCommons@UMaineTechnical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station8-1-1987TB128: Beauveria bassiana for Control ofColorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae) in MaineR. H. StorchJ. F. DillFollow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletinPart of the Entomology CommonsThis Report is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by anauthorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact um.library.technical.services@maine.edu.Recommended CitationStorch, R.H., and J.F. Dill. 1987. Bauveria bassiana for control of Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelida) in Maine. MaineAgricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 128.ISSN 0734-9556 Beauveria bassiana for Control of Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Maine R. H. Storch and J. F. Dill MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION UNIVERSITY OE MAINE TECHNICAL BULLETIN 128 AUGUST 1987 Beauveria bassiana for Control of Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Maine R. H. Storch Professor, Depar tmen t of Entomology and J. F. Dill Cooperat ing Associate Professor of Entomology ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS These tests were made possible bv Abbott Laboratories who produced and formulated the mycomsecticide. Funding was provided by Pilot Test Program (USDA, ARS), the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Maine Cooperative Extension Service. TABLE OF C O N T E N T S INTRODUCTION 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS 1 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3 LITERATURE CITED 7 I N T R O D U C T I O N One of the major pests which threaten commercial potato production in the northeastern United States is the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), (CPB). Insecticides have traditionally been the sole means for controlling the beetle. As a result of the extensive use of chemicals, the beetle has developed resistance to insecticides (Forgash 1981) and the environment has been contaminated bv insecticide residues. CFB populations with resistance to some insecticides are highest in southern Maine and decrease as latitude increases (Forgash 1985). Consequently, alternative methods to control the beetle are needed. Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuill. {Bb), a fungal pathogen of the beetle has been used to control CPB in eastern Europe and the Soviet Union (Lappa 1978) and in France (Farques, Cugier, and van deWeghe 1980). Preliminary studies in the United States gave promising results for CPB control by using the fungus (Campbell, Anderson, Semel, and Roberts 1985; Roberts, LeBrun, and Semel 1981; Watt and LeBrun 1984). Based on these studies, a three-vear pilot test program was initiated to evaluate the potential for using Bb to control the Colorado potato beetle in the United States. An overview of the results of the pilot test program in the United States is available (Hajek, Soper. Roberts, Anderson, Biever, Ferro, LeBrun, and Storch 1987). We report herein on the results obtained in southern Maine from using this mycoinsecticide to control the beetle. MATERIALS A N D METHOD S The experiments were conducted at the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station located in Monmouth, Maine from 1983 through 1985. In 1983 and 1984. 0.2 ha, unreplicated plots surrounded by bare soil were used. CPB population and yield data for each treatment were taken from each of two areas that were 4 rows by 30.5 m (0.01 ha) located near the center of each plot. In 1985, the experiment was changed to a randomized complete block design with 4 replicates of each treatment. Each plot was 16 rows by 21.3 m (0.03 ha) and the sample area in each plot was 4 rows by 14.6 m (0.005 ha). The non-sample areas of each plot were treated with aldicarb to reduce movement of adult beetles into the sample area. In all years, sample areas were set up to exclude "wheel-rows" because yields in "wheel-rows" are usually lower than in "non-wheel-rows" due to compacting of the soil bv tractors and spray equipment. Each year healthy Katahdin seed pieces, ca. 75 g each, were planted with a picker planter. Fertilization, cultivation, and hilling practices normal to the area were used. Late blight was controlled by applications of chlorothalonil. A chronological list of major events is presented in Table 1. B. bassiana was applied at rates of 5 x HI13 colony forming units (cfu) per hectare (high Bb) and 5 x 1012 cfu's/ba (low Bb). A Century boom sprayer MA1.S Technical Bullet in 12H Table I Chronological Table of Kvents Event lulian Date I"N3 1984 Plant 138 12'^  ION 5 134 Cultivate 172 1M lo2 1st M Application 192 173 170 2nd Bb Application 1% INI 174 3rd Bb Application 200 185 IS1 4th/M Application 20S 191 ISn 1st Standard Insecticide Application 193 174 INI 2nd Standard Insecticide Application 198 202 3rd Standard Insecticide Application — 208 211 1st Nine Desiccant Application 235 — 1^1 2nd Vine Desiccant Application 242 — 23S Harvest 255 — 254 (—) — activity not performed equipped with 3 drop nozzles/row applied the mvcoinsecticide at a pressure of 7.0 kg/sq cm and 9 35.4 1/ha of water. Formulations of the isolate ARSKF 252 used in the experiments were provided bv Abbott Laboratories. Applications of the mvcoinsecticide were begun when the composition of the larval population was 70:30 small larvae to large larvae (1983) or after hatched egg masses were counted on two successive sampling dates) 1984 and 1985). In all vears, applications were continued at 4-dav intervals for a total of 4 sprays. The standard insecticide (fenvalerate in 1983 and permethrin in 1984 and 1985) was applied with the boom sprayer at a rate of 224 g active ingredient per hectare whenever the CPB action threshold for Maine was reached (4 larvae and/or adults per plant based on a count of 100 plants). Population data were taken twice weekly on 0.3 m of stem as follows. The categories recorded were a) number of unhatched egg masses, b) number of egg masses with newly emerged larvae on the mass, c) number of small larvae (1st and 2nd larval stages), d) number of large larvae (3rd and 4th larval stages), and e) number of adults. Counts were made on fifty stems in each of the two sample areas in each plot in 1983 and 1984. In 1985 counts were made on twenty-five stems in each sample area of each plot (100 stems/treatment). Defoliation ratings were made neartheend of the growing season usingthe visual rating system presented in Table 2. Statistical analyses were not performed because of the subjective nature of the data. Data on yield of tubers were taken from the sample areas of each plot. The tubers were harvested and sorted into three grades: undersize = tubers 3.2 to 5.7 cm diameter, U.S. No. I's = tubers 5.7 to 10.2 cm diameter, and oversize MAI'S Tech nical Hulletin 1I!S ^ = tubers greater than 10.2 cm diameter. Tubers in each grade were weighed and analyses of variance were calculated following transformation of the data using login ( \ + l ) . Table 2 Visual Defoliation Rating System 0 = N o feeding damage 1 = A few leaflets with feeding holes 2 — Some leaflets consumed, a few bare petioles 3 = Several stems mostly defoliated 1 = Most stems defoliated, only a few lower leaves remaining 5 = All stems defoliated R E S U L T S A N D D I S C U S S I O N T h e most effective foliage protection, indicated bv the defoliation index, was provided by the standard insecticide t reatment (Table 3). Some foliage protection was observed in fields treated with the high dosage of Rb, but defoliation in fields treated with the low dosage of Rb was similar to defoliation in fields where no C P B control measures were under taken. Table 3 Effect of C P B Control Measures on Defoliation Treatment Defoliation Rating High R. bassiana Low R. bassiana Standard Insecticide No Insecticide 1983 1985 1.5 (231) 3.1 3.5 3.6 0.5 1.8 3.5 3.S • Number s in parentheses are Julian dates when readings were taken. T h e yields of tubers bv grade and the total yields are given in Table 4. Total yield and yield of U.S. No. 1 tubers were significantly higher from fields treated with the standard insecticide in 1983. T h e reason(s) for differences in yields of undersize and oversize tubers is not known. T h e extremely low yield in the low Rb plot in 1983 was probably due to high weed populations in two of the sample rows. Results of the 1984 test are not presented because excessive rain prevented the application of materials according to schedule. Late application of Bb did not provide C P B control and all foliage in the 4 MAI'S Technical Bulletin 128 fields was consumed prior to maturation of the tubers. In l985 , the total yield and yield of U.S. No. 1 tubers in the fields treated with the standard insec-ticide and high rate of Rb did not differ significantly. In all years the total yield and yield of U.S. No. 1 tubers from control fields and fields treated with the low rate of Rb were significantly lower than yields from other fields treated with the standard insecticide. 'Table 4 Average Yield (in kg) of Tubers per 30..'' meters of Row in Monmouth, Maine Treatment Yield and Standard Deviation Under- US Over- Total size No. 1 size 1983 High R. bassiana 7.2 b 65.Sb 2.4a 73.3b (2.0) (7.2) (1.9) (S.9) Low R. bassiana 9.0a 47.4c 0.2 b 59.6c (1.4) (9.7) (1.9) (7.3) Standard Insecticide K.5ah S9.5a 2.9a 9S.0a (1.0) (o. l) (2.0) (6.2) No Insecticide 9.3 a 96.1b 1.4ab 79.7b (1.9) (S.7) (1.2) (10.0) I9S5 High R. bassiana vOa f.9.1ab (1.3a 72.3ab (0.4) (10.2) (0.3) (10.2) Low R. buss!ti nil 2.5a 91.9 b 0.2a 64.6 b (0.7) (9.0) (0.4) (6.3) Standard Insecticide 2.9a S4.(la 0.5a S7.5a (0.4) (16.21 (0.51 (15.9) No Insecticide 2.2a 91.7 b 0.1a 64.0 b (0.4) (S.6) (0.1) (S.9) For each year, anv two means in a column sharing a common letter are not significantly different (p < 0.(15) Number s in parentheses are the standard deviation of the mean. Population data on numbers of C P B stages can be summarized as follows. Numbers of egg masses in fields treated with the standard insecticide were higher than egg masses in other fields late in the growing season (Figure 1). MAES Technical Bulletin 12S 5 Figure 1. The mean number of Colorado potato beetle egg masses on 0.3 m of potato stem in plots treated with a high rate of B. bassiana, a standard insecticide, and a plot not treated with insecticide in 1983 and 1985. Figure 2. The mean number of larval Colorado potato beetles on 0.3 m of potato stem in plots treated with a high rate of B. bassiana, a standard insecticide, and a plot not treated with insecticide in I9S5. (i MAES Technical Bulletin 16 After control measures were initiated, numbers of larvae (small and large) were much lower in plots treated with the standard insecticide than in other plots (Figure 2). T h e number of larvae in plots treated with the high dosage of Bb was lower than in the control plot, but fluctuations in larval populations in these two plots w ere similar. T h e numbers of adult beetles at the beginning of the season were similar in all plots, but after mid-July they were generally higher in control plots (Figure 3). T h e numbers of adults in plots treated with the high dosage of Bb and the standard insecticide were similar. T h e main effect of Bb on beetle populations is noted by the lower numbers of adults in plots treated with the high rate of the mycoinsecticide when compared to the control plots. T h e larger n u m b e r of adults in the control plot is probablv due to first generation adults which eclosed in the plot. A complete second C P B generation does not occur in Maine . ( ) \ iposition bv the first generation adults which appear in late July or early August is low and few of the larvae which hatch from these eggs develop to the pupal stage. T h e first generation adults feed for a short period and then enter the soil to Figure 3. T h e mean number of adult Colorado potato beetles on 0.3 m of potato stem in plots treated with a high rate of B. bassiana, a s tandard insecticide, and a plot not treated with insecticide in 1983 and 1985. MAKS Technical Bulletin 12S 7 overwinter. A reduction in the number of first generation adults should result in fewer overwintering adults emerging from the soil the following spring. As evidence of this, dead adult beetles, covered with fungal mycelium were observed in plots treated with Rb the previous vear, but not in plots which received no Rb. The importance of timing of applications to obtain adequate control is indicated by the lack of control in 1984, when weather conditions prevented the application of material according to schedule. It is possible to obtain adequate CPB control in Maine hv using the nivcoinsecticide provided the material can be applied at the proper time and rate and under the proper weather conditions. The material must be applied when adequate moisture for sun. ival of fungal spores is present, late in the afternoon or evening. Also, it will be necessarv to scout large portions of a field to obtain population data to determine when to initiate nivcoinsecticide treatment and to make applications (four) according to schedule (at four day intervals). LITERATURE CITED Campbell, R. K., T. E. Anderson, M. Semel, and D. \V. Roberts. 1985. Management of the Colorado potato beetle using the entomogenous fungus Reauveria bassiana. Amer. Potato J. 62:29-37. Farques, J., J. P. Cugier, and P. van de W'eghe. 19K0. Experimentation enparcelles du champignon Reauveria bassiana (Hvphomvcete) contre Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Col., Chrysomelidae). Acta Ecol. 1:49-61. Forgash, A. J. 1981. Insecticide resistance of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Sav). In: Lashomb, J. H. and R. Casagrande (eds.). Advances in potato pest management. Hutchinson Ross Publ. Co., Stroudsburg, FA., pp. 34-46. Forgash, A. J. 1985. Insecticide resistance in the Colorado potato beetle. In: Ferro, D. N. and R. H. Voss (eds.), Proceedings of the symposium on the Colorado potato beetle, XVIIth International Congress of Entomology. Mass. Agr. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. No. 704, pp. 3.5-52. Havek, Ann E., Richard S. Soper, Donald W. Roberts, Thomas E. Anderson, K. Duane Biever, David N. Ferro, Roger A. LeBrun, and Richard H. Storch. 1987. Foliar applications of Reauveria bassiana for control of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleop-tera: Chrysomelidae): An overview of pilot test results from the northern United States. Canad. Entomol. 119 In press. Lappa, N. V. 1978. Practical applications of entomopathogenic muscardine fungi. In: Ignoffo, C. M. (ed.), Proceedings of the 1st Joint US/USSR conference on production, selection, and standardization of entomopatho-genic fungi (Project V). NTIS, Springfield, VA., pp. 51-61. 8 MAES Technical Bulletin 128 Roberts, D . W . , R. A. LeBrun , and M . S e m e l . 1981. Control of the Colorado potato beetle with fungi. In: Lashomb, J. A. and R. Cassagrande (eds.). Advances in potato pest management. Hutchinson Koss Fubl. Co., Strouds-burg, FA., pp. 119-137. Watt, B. A. and R. A. LeBrun. 1984. Soil effects of Beauveria bassiana on pupal populations of the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chryso-melidae). Environ. Kntomol. li:15-IS. 

TB128: Beauveria bassiana for Control of Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Maine

https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&amp;context=aes_techbulletin

TB128: Beauveria bassiana for Control of Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Maine

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Maine