Liggett, Bradley D.

English

Brigham Young University Law School

BYU Law ReviewVolume 2008 | Issue 1 Article 53-1-2008Contra Applicantem or Contra ProferentemApplicatio: The Need for Clarification of theDoctrine of Contra Proferentem in the Contextof Insured-Created Ambiguities in InsuranceApplicationsBradley D. LiggettFollow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreviewPart of the Insurance Law CommonsThis Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has beenaccepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contacthunterlawlibrary@byu.edu.Recommended CitationBradley D. Liggett, Contra Applicantem or Contra Proferentem Applicatio: The Need for Clarification of the Doctrine of Contra Proferentemin the Context ofInsured-Created Ambiguities in Insurance Applications, 2008 BYU L. Rev. 211 (2008).Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2008/iss1/5

Contra Applicantem or Contra Proferentem Applicatio: The Need for Clarification of the Doctrine of Contra Proferentem in the Context ofInsured-Created Ambiguities in Insurance Applications

https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2438&amp;context=lawreview

Contra Applicantem or Contra Proferentem Applicatio: The Need for Clarification of the Doctrine of Contra Proferentem in the Context ofInsured-Created Ambiguities in Insurance Applications

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Brigham Young University Law School