Kuklinski, Nicholas J

English

Trinity University

Trinity UniversityDigital Commons @ TrinityInformation Literacy Resources for CurriculumDevelopment Information Literacy CommitteeFall 2011Peer Evaluation WorksheetNicholas J. KuklinskiTrinity UniversityFollow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/infolit_grantdocsThis Instructional Material is brought to you for free and open access by the Information Literacy Committee at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It hasbeen accepted for inclusion in Information Literacy Resources for Curriculum Development by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @Trinity. For more information, please contact jcostanz@trinity.edu.Repository CitationKuklinski, Nicholas J., "Peer Evaluation Worksheet" (2011). Information Literacy Resources for Curriculum Development. 24.https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/infolit_grantdocs/24CHEM 3432. Fall 2011. Peer Evaluation.  Name:         Date:      On a separate piece of paper, provide a summary of the previous group’s findings. Use your own words to summarize the articles that were presented, indicating what you understand about the purpose of each study, the methods used, and the implications of the results. Indicate what remains unclear to you. Note that it is perfectly acceptable to not understand every aspect of every article. Recognizing what you don’t understand is quite useful. 500-1000 words.    EVALUATION. Briefly answer each of the following:  1a.  Do the students make use of appropriate bibliographic sources?  Not At All   Inconsistencies/Oversights   Superior Job   1   2   3   4   5  1b.  Do the students employ proper documentation citation practice?  Not At All   Inconsistencies/Oversights   Superior Job   1   2   3   4   5  2.  Are there a variety of sources presented, or is a single set of related authors given? Not At All   Inconsistencies/Oversights   Superior Job   1   2   3   4   5  3.  How do the students convey their findings to you?  Do they employ clear communication?  Not At All   Inconsistencies/Oversights   Superior Job   1   2   3   4   5  4.  Is there substantial findings presented about the given topic? Not At All   Inconsistencies/Oversights   Superior Job   1   2   3   4   5   5.  Do the submitted findings draw a conclusion as to where the study should continue? Not At All   Inconsistencies/Oversights   Superior Job   1   2   3   4   5   

Peer Evaluation Worksheet

https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&amp;context=infolit_grantdocs

Peer Evaluation Worksheet

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Trinity University