Food choices have changed among Native American populations. Healthy food choices are subject to lifestyles, cooking skills, nutrition knowledge and the availability of healthy foods. There is a paucity of nutritional information on traditional and cultural Native American foods. Sixteen traditional Dakota recipes were prepared by members of the Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate, Sisseton, South Dakota. These foods were pureed, lyophilized and analyzed for moisture, ash, fat, protein, carbohydrate and individual mineral content using officially accepted methods. The following mineral elements were analyzed: calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, sodium and zinc. Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) were employed in all cases. Native American traditional foods studied included: dried com soup, fish head soup, parched com, bean soup, hominy (Pasdaypi) soup, buffaloberry (Mastinpute) pudding, tripe soup, kabubu bread, buffalo (Tatanka) roast, chokecherry (Canpa) pudding, potato soup (Maka bdo), com balls (Wahuwapa Wasna), pemmican, plum (Kan\u27ta) pudding, turtle soup and wild rice (Psi) soup. Our study determined that traditional Native American recipes tested were generally healthier in relation to selected nutrients such as fat content, total calories, and sodium content when compared to contemporary recipes that use common ingredients. These foods may provide healthy choices in the Native American diet when prepared in traditional ways

Gengler, Mary Lynn

Stluka, Suzanne Parker

English

Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange

The Journal of Undergraduate ResearchVolume 2 Journal of Undergraduate Research, Volume3: 2004 Article 22004Nutritional Composition of Selected TraditionalNative American FoodsSuzanne Parker StlukaSouth Dakota State UniversityMary Lynn GenglerSouth Dakota State UniversityFollow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/jurPart of the Native American Studies Commons, and the Nutrition CommonsThis Article is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and InformationExchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Journal of Undergraduate Research by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open PublicResearch Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact michael.biondo@sdstate.edu.Recommended CitationStluka, Suzanne Parker and Gengler, Mary Lynn (2004) "Nutritional Composition of Selected Traditional Native American Foods,"The Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 2, Article 2.Available at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/jur/vol2/iss1/2TRADITIONAL NATIVEAMERICAN FOODS 1Nutritional Composition of SelectedTraditional Native American FoodsAuthors: Suzanne Parker Stiuka andMary Lynn GenglerFaculty Sponsor: Padmanaban G. Krishnan, Ph.D.*Department: Nutrition, Food Science and HospitalitySubmitted as a requirement of an Undergraduate Research Assistantship. Supportedby a grant from the USDA National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program and aSD EPSCoR Undergraduate Research Assistantship, 2004. *Author to whom correspondenceshould be addressed (Padmanaban.Krishnan@sdstate.edu).ABSTRACTFood choices have changed among Native American populations. Healthy foodchoices are subject to lifestyles, cooking skills, nutrition knowledge and the availabilityof healthy foods. There is a paucity of nutritional information on traditional and culturalNative American foods. Sixteen traditional Dakota recipes were prepared by members ofthe Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate, Sisseton, South Dakota. These foods were pureed,lyophilized and analyzed for moisture, ash, fat, protein, carbohydrate and individualmineral content using officially accepted methods. The following mineral elements wereanalyzed: calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, sodiumand zinc. Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) wereemployed in all cases. Native American traditional foods studied included: dried comsoup, fish head soup, parched com, bean soup, hominy (Pasdaypi) soup, buffaloberry(Mastinpute) pudding, tripe soup, kabubu bread, buffalo (Tatanka) roast, chokecherry(Canpa) pudding, potato soup (Maka bdo), com balls (Wahuwapa Wasna), pemmican,plum (Kan'ta) pudding, turtle soup and wild rice (Psi) soup. Our study determined thattraditional Native American recipes tested were generally healthier in relation to selectednutrients such as fat content, total calories, and sodium content when compared tocontemporary recipes that use common ingredients. These foods may provide healthychoices in the Native American diet when prepared in traditional ways.INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this study was to conduct a nutritional and compositional analysis ofinfrequentlyconsumedtraditionaland cultural NativeAmericanfoods for whichnutritional information is not currently available. The foods chosen were components ofthe traditional Dakota diet from the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate, Sisseton, South Dakota.TRADITIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN FOODSSamples selected for analyses were identified in consultation with members of the tribeand food preparation was carried and documented by Gyate members.The nutritional status of Native Americans has changed over time. From the turn ofthe 20tb century up until the 1970's, the main nutritional concern for the nativepopulation was malnutrition, usually from under-nutrition (Story et al 1998). Thetraditional diet was gradually replaced with a diet that was higher in fat containing lessfruits and vegetables (Byers 1996). Today, traditional foods are not commonly eaten bythe native population. Lytle and coworkers (2002) found that only 7 of 80 childrensurveyed consumed any traditional foods. Only 7 of the 1,308 foods mentioned in theirsurveys were traditional foods. Traditional foods are regarded as healthy, but areconsumed only at festivals and other special events (deGonzague 1999, Kuhnlein 1979).In the day-to-day diet, these foods have been replaced with high fat, high caloriecontemporary food products. The under-nutrition seen in the 1970's has been replaced bymalnutrition with over-nutrition where vitamin and mineral intake is low, but caloricintake is sufficient to maintain obesity (Story et al 1998, Lytle et al 2002). deGonzague(1999) summarized nine dietary studies of adult Native Americans. The studies tookplace from 1963 tol996 and looked at Native American populations in Arizona, NorthCarolina, North and South Dakota, and Oklahoma. These studies found nutrients to belacking and between 31% - 47% of energy coming from fat. This intake is in conflictwith the American Heart Association recommendation that no more than 30% of energyshould come from fat. Native American foods that are prepared in traditional ways arelikely to be inherently healthy in relation to key nutrients owing to the absence ofexcessive fat and refined sugars. As such, they have a role to play in the improvement oftoday's diet.Limited information is available on the nutritional composition of such traditionalNative American foods.MATERIALS AND METHODSSixteen traditional food samples were prepared by members of the Sisseton WahpetonGyate, Sisseton, South Dakota. Food samples provided were dried corn soup, fish headsoup, parched com, bean soup, hominy soup, buffalo berry pudding, tripe soup, kabububread, buffalo roast, chokecherry pudding, potato soup, com balls, pemmican, plumpudding, turtle soup and wild rice soup. These samples were pureed, lyophilized andground to a fine powder. These treatments insured homogeneity of sampling andminimized sampling error. Samples were analyzed for moisture, ash, total fat, protein(combustion analysis), carbohydrates (by difference) and individual mineral elements(calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphoms, potassium, sodium andzinc) following AGAC methods. Moisture analysis was determined using an air-oven setat 130°C for 1 hour. Total mineral content or ash content was determined by incineratinga known weight of sample in a muffle fumace at 600°C ovemight, Ether-extracted fatcontent was determined in a Goldfish apparatus and a 4-hour refluxing time. Proteincontent was determined using a combustion method and a nitrogen %-to-protein %TRADITIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN FOODSconversion factor of 6.25. Trace element composition was determined by digestingsamples in concentrated sulfuric acid followed by appropriate dilution and AtomicAbsorption Spectroscopy. Carbohydrate content was determined by subtracting protein%, fat %, ash % and moisture % from 100%. As serving sizes are not standardized forthese traditional Native American foods, nutrition information is reported on the basis of100 grams weight. Energy derived from such foods were normalized to Kilocaloriesobtained from a serving size typically consumed (cup, slice, ounces, etc.) if such servingsizes were actually consumed. Units for protein, fat, carbohydrates and mineralelements were reported as micrograms, milligrams or grams of nutrient consumed per100 grams eaten.SELECTED RECIPES (INGREDIENT LIST):Pemmican (dried buffalo, dried choke cherries)Potato Soup (diced potatoes, celery, onions and crackling)Dried Com Soup (dried sweet com, dried wild turnips, onions and buffalo meat)Bean Soup (pinto beans, onions, potatoes, side pork)Tripe soup (hominy, potatoes, onion, beef tripe)Hominy soup (beef, onions, potatoes, hominy)Com Balls (ground parched com, pork lard)Parched Corn (water, salt, parched corn)RESULTSThis study yielded nutritional and compositional data for sixteen traditional Dakotafood products. Of these items, eight were soups that employed a variety of ingredients(tables 1, 2 and 3) Computerized nutrient data banks provide useful data for comparisonswith analyzed values for the traditional Native American recipes (table 4, ESHAResearch). The protein content of these Native American soups had a narrow range from1.5 to 5.5 grams per 100 grams. Protein content in prepared soups may range from 1.3grams to 14.8 grams per 100 gram (ESHA Research). Pemmican and buffalo roastshowed a high protein content of 12.7g/100g and 26.9 g/lOOg, respectively (table 3).TRADITIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN FOODSFigure 1. Dried Corn Soup containing wild prairie turnip (Tipsina), onion,sweet dry corn, and buffalo meat.Figure 2. Pictureshows frozen wildplum (Kan'ta) juicebeing thawed andheated beforeaddition ofthickening agents.Figure 3. Prairie turnip(Tipsina) dried in a braid.TRADITIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN FOODSFigure 4. Tribal Elders. Dorothy Gill and ClaraEagle, two Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate eldersdemonstrating how traditional foods wereharvested, preserved and prepared.Figure 5, Picture of Buffaloberry Plant. (Imagecopyright ©2004. PlantsDatabase.com. Used withpermission.)Table 1. Proximate composition of selected traditional Native American foods.Calories(KCal/conventionalNative American Food serving size*)Calories(KCal/IOOg)Fat(g/IOOg)Protein(g/IOOg)Ash CHO ](g/IOOg) (g/IOOg)Moisture(g/IOOgIDried Corn Soup 131.25 52.5 0.5 4.9 0.5 7.1 87.0Fish Head Soup 50.75 20.3 0.3 4.2 0.2 0.2 95.1Parched Corn Soup 209.3 83.7 0.9 2.0 0.7 16.9 79.6Bean Soup 170.0 68.0 1.2 3.9 0.7 10.4 84.3Hominy (Pasdaypi) Soup 169.0 67.6 2.4 5.5 0.4 6.0 85.7Buffaloberry (Mastinpute) Pudding 173.6 124.0 0.1 1.1 0.5 29.9 68.4Tripe Soup 89.5 35.8 0.6 3.9 0.3 3.7 91.7Kabubu Bread 88.7 316.7 3.5 9.5 2.0 61.8 23.2Buffalo (Tatanka) Roast 119.0 141.7 2.9 26.9 1.12 2.0 67.1Choke Cherry (Canpa) Pudding 230.0 164.3 0.3 2.0 0.6 38.4 58.8Potato (Maka bdo) Soup 140.8 56.3 1.5 4.3 0.8 6.4 87.2Corn Balls (Wahuwapa Wasna) 136.4 487.1 21.9 8.6 1.6 63.9 4.0Pemmican 59.1 211.0 7.4 12.7 1.0 23.4 55.4Plum (Kan'ta) Pudding 102.0 72.8 0.0 0.2 1.8 18.0 80.0Turtle Soup 48.3 19.3 0.5 1.4 0.2 2.3 95.7Wild Rice (Psi) Soup w/BB 127.0 50.8 0.8 3.0 0.7 7.9 87.7^Serving size for soups=250g. bread=I slice or 28g , pudding= 0.5 cups or 140g, meat= 3 ounces or 84g,Pemmican=l ounce or 28g, com balls =1 ounce or 28g.6 TRADITIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN FOODSTable 2. Mineral content of traditional Native American foods.Calcium Cu Iron Mg Mn Ph Sodium K ZincNative American Food (mg/ioog) (ug/g) (ug/g) (mg/ioog) (ug/g) (mg/ioog) (mg/ioog) (mg/ioog) (ug/g)Dried Corn Soup 13 <1 7.7 17 1.2 54 159 13 8.9Fish Head Soup <10 <1 3.0 1 <1 15 26 33 1.5Parched Com Soup 11 <1 8.2 29 1.7 63 90 188 5.4Bean Soup 15 1 15.9 23 1.8 59 223 42 4.3Hominy (Pasdaypi) Soup <10 <1 7.8 12 <1 42 135 22 10.7Buffaloberry (Mastinpute) Pudding 24 <1 11.0 14 1.8 23 133 17 1.7Tripe Soup 14 <1 4.9 8 <1 17 62 33 2.9Kabubu Bread 176 2 102.0 29 8.3 169 157 365 18.5Buffalo (Tatanka) Roast 17 2 39.0 19 <1 176 278 41 72.5Choke Cherry (Canpa) Pudding 45 1 20.1 20 4.7 34 160 17 3.5Potato (Maka bdo) Soup 13 <1 5.4 15 1.0 51 212 45 4.5Com Balls (Wahuwapa Wasna) <10 3 23.3 104 5.4 284 336 245 20.5Pemmican 56 4 38.6 30 5.6 134 368 25 19.0Plum (Kan'ta) Pudding <10 <1 5.2 5 <1 9 137 18 <0.5Turtle Soup 2 <1 16.6 1 <1 14 027 38 2.9Wild Rice (Psi) Soup w/BB 11 <1 .6.6 18 1.7 89 216 44 5.2Parched CornSouphad Itsp salt alongwith 1 C parched cornand 3 cupswaterin the entirerecipe.Comballsrecipeconsisted of 2 C parched com and 6 Tablespoons of porklard.Nameswithinparenthesis areDakotanamesfor the food items.Table 3. Comparisonsbetween traditionalNativeAmerican foods and their contemporarycounterparts.Calories Calories Fat Protein CHO MineralsFood Product (KCal/serving) (KCal/lOOg) (g/lOOg) (g/lOOg) (g/lOOg) (g/lOOg)Traditional Native American Bean Soup 170.0 68.0 1.2 3.9 10.4 0.70Contemporary Bean Soup 55.5 66.1 2.45 3.5 7.6 0.65Buffalo Roast 119.0 141.7 2.9 26.9 2.0 1.12Beef Roast 160.4 191.0 8.6 28.4 0.0 0.71Composition forcontemporary beansoupandbeefroastarequoted fromFoodProcessor ForWindows Version 8,ESHA Research, Salem, OR.TRADITIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN FOODSTable 4. Composition of selected prepared soups.SoupCalories Carbohydrate Protein Fat Sodium Calcium(KCayserving) (g/lOOg) (g/IOOg) (g/lOOg) (mg/lOOg) (mg/lOOg)Cream Salmon Soup 261.0 2.64 11.39 5.12 621.37 117.37Sweet & Sour Soup 71.7 5.86 1.33 0.34 529.49 11.14Hot & Sour Soup (Hot & Spicy Chinese) 162.0 2.05 6.20 3.32 414.17 12.00Tuna w/ Rice & Mushroom Soup 352.0 13.59 8.18 5.87 374.37 39.14Egg Drop Soup 73.0 0.45 3.08 1.57 298.60 8.60Minestrone Soup WTW 120.0 7.73 1.68 0.67 255.31 33.59Gumbo Soup-No Rice 178.0 4.53 6.05 3.46 248.83 31.53Chicken & Rice Soup WTW 178.0 5.71 2.02 0.50 241.87 20.16Crab Bisque Soup 235.8 4.65 8.23 4.72 235.69 101.93Wonton Soup 188.5 5.93 5.84 2.92 225.26 12.89Borscht-Beet Soup 78.5 3.37 1.37 1.64 202.25 19.16Bouillabaise Soup/Chowder 241.0 2.11 14.80 3.94 183.12 36.43Lobster Bisque Soup 251.8 5.11 8.17 5.29 181.55 110.87Lobster Gumbo Soup 178.0 8.39 4.01 2.87 180.91 46.91Shrimp Gumbo Soup 169.8 7.67 3.99 2.80 140.76 42.81Menudo-Mexican Beef Soup 117.6 2.57 5.55 1.59 136.57 6.74Creamy Portobello Mushroom Soup IFI 82.3 4.12 1.65 1.23 127.57 8.23Cream of Broccoli Soup 205.8 7.03 3.68 5.15 85.96 108.07Fisherman's Soup 193.8 4.83 9.66 2.20 73.66 60.71Pork Rice and Vegetable Soup 126.9 3.21 5.04 1.82 22.70 6.46Chilli 170.0 8.58 2.68 2.64 414.00 17.00Clam Chowder 165.0 6.70 3.82 2.66 400.00 75.00Potato Soup 175.0 4.70 0.72 0.97 410.00 8.00Chicken Noodle Soup 126.0 8.40 3.02 0.67 248.59 20.16Tomato Soup 162.5 8.99 2.46 2.42 300.00 64.00^Serving size for soup is 1 cup or 250 gm. Adapted from Food Processor for Windows, ESHA Research, Salem, OR.A narrow range in fat content (0.3g to 2.4g/100g) was noted in traditional soups incontrast to a range of 0.34g to 5.87g/100g that occurred in the soups reported in theliterature (ESHA Research). A fat content of 3 grams per serving or less will permit alow-fat claim according to current labeling regulations. All soups tested in this study withthe exception of Hominy Soup and Potato Soup qualified as low fat soups. Aconventional serving size for soup may vary between 244 to 250 grams per serving(generally 1 cup). The highest content of fat was noted in Wahuwappa Wasna, a dessertthat contained 6 tablespoons of lard in two cups of parched corn. Buffalo roast containeda significantly lower fat content (2.9g/100g) in comparison to beef roast (8.6g/100g).Sodium content in the 8 soups compared favorably (13 to 45 mg/lOOg) to correspondingvalues for soups found in the computerized data banks (22.7 to 621.4 mg/lOOg, table 4).Energy in traditional Native American soups derived from consuming typical servingsize ranged from 48.3KCal to 209.3 KCal. Table 4 shows a higher range (51.7 to 352KCal) in energy in non-Native American conventionally prepared soups. Tribal eldershave noted that traditional foods are prepared differently today with added sugar and fatsin order to increase their palatability. This practice will undoubtedly yield less desirablenutritional outcomes with respect to calories, fat and sodium content.SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONA comparison of nutrient content on a serving-for-serving basis showed thattraditional Native American foods analyzed in this study were generally healthier thancontemporaryrecipes in relation to key nutrients such as fat, calories and sodium.With the exceptionof the com balls, the majority of the.recipes tested were low in fatand sodium.REFERENCESOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. The Association of Official AnalyticalChemists. Washington, DC 1998.Byers,T. 1996.Nutritionand cancer amongAmericanIndians andAlaskaNatives.Cancer, 78:1612-1616.deGonzague,B., Receveur, O., Wedell,D., and Kuhnlein, H. 1999. Dietary intake andbody mass index of adults in two Ojibwa communities.Journal of the AmericanDietetics Association, 99 (6):710-716.Food Processor for Windows Version 8, ESHA Research, Salem, Oregon.Kuhnlein H., Calloway D., Harland B. 1979. Composition of traditional Hopi foods.Journal of the American Dietetics Association 1979 75:37-40.LytleL., DixonL., Cunningham-Sabo L., EvansM., Gittelsohn J., Hurley J., SnyderP.,Stevens J., Weber J. Anliker J., Hellee K., Story M. 2002. Dietary intakes of NativeAmerican children: Findings from the Pathways Feasibility Study. (Research andProfessional Briefs). Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(4):555-559.Nixon, L 2002. Collaborative SDSU-SWCC Nutrition Project Enhances CommunityHealth, Farm and Home Research Journal Volume 53(1) 14-16.Story,M., Strauss K., ZephierE., and BroussardB. 1998.NutritionalconcernsinAmerican Indians and Alaska Native children: transitions and future direction.Journal of the American Dietetic Association 98 (2): 170-176.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe authors wish to thank Dedria A. Keeble and Karen Brown for the production ofTraditional Native American Foods. Pictures on food production were provided courtesyof Karla Witt-Lowe, Sisseton Wahpeton College, Sisseton, SD 57262.This research was funded by a grant from the National Research InitiativeCompetitive Grant Program, USDA CSREES (Improving Today's Diet with TraditionalFoods, Award Number 00384249501, 2000, Principle Investigators: Helen Chipman,Ph.D., R.D., Marilyn Swanson, Ph.D., R.D., and Padmanaban (Padu) Krishnan, Ph.D.),Undergraduate Assistantship funds for Suzanne Parker Stluka were provided by aNational Science Foundation/EPSCoR Grant, #EPS-009148.This article is dedicated to the memory ofDorothy Geraldine Gill.

Nutritional Composition of Selected Traditional Native American Foods

https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1119&context=jur

Nutritional Composition of Selected Traditional Native American Foods

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange