research

King Gough : Madness Or Magnificence? A Retrospective View Of The 1975 APSA Conference

Abstract

In 2000, I chose to mark the 25th anniversary by a personal project to complement the formal conference on the topic of the Whitlam years held later in the year on the specific anniversary. As President of APSA in that momentous year, I chaired the committee which organised the conference that year, held amid damp conditions at the Canberra CAE. The conference occurred in the hothouse environment of July 1975, a period of unprecedented levels of political uncertainty. Indeed, the very title of the conference, "The First Thousand Days of Labor" devised by John Power inadvertently begged a momentous question: Would Whitlam last beyond his first thousand days? Answer - just, 1074. The attendance at the conference, over 400 including the down-town public servants, was also abnormally large. Finally, the format of the conference, squeezing all contributors into a straight-jacket of a single theme, was also an innovation - and never repeated because some vocal groups felt disenfranchised by its intellectual parochialism. These special characteristics of the conference justify this exercise in retrospectivity. It fits into a theme of reviewing Australian federalism since 1975 was such a cataclysmic year. It was a mirror of where the Whitlam government was taking the public policy agenda - towards institutional reforms in the public service, reaching into local and regional communities, creating new slants on federalism and engaging in an activist and independent foreign policy (not least with respect to East Timor). It was also engaging the scholarly attention of a wide variety of participants not normally much in evidence at APSA conferences, including senior administrators, serving politicians journalists, union officials and ministerial staff. Some of these have faded into relative obscurity or joined their ancestors, but the list of - then/now - occupations in the Appendices suggest an unusual diversity of backgrounds at the time and subsequent to the conference. I decided to send the conference contributors a copy of their original papers and respond to the questions of how much things have changed since they wrote and how accurate were any predictions and analyses they offered. What did the differences tell us about thet state of the discipline of political science then and now? The papers are arranged as they were in 1975 - in four sections : "Government, Parliament and Parliamentarians", "Machinery of Government", "Federalism" and "Public Policy". A fifth section, on international relations could not be sustained in this retrospective as few authors could be contacted who had any interest in reviewing what they had written that long ago and many had not survived. Hard copies of this retrospective were tabled at the 2000 APSA conference. The original 1975 papers were photocopied and bound into two volumes with the modest technology then available and can still be found in many university libraries which received free copies from APSA. They will be catalogued as "The First Thousand Days of Labor" perhaps with attributions to compilers Scott, Richardson, Power and Wettenhall

    Similar works