Comparing the effectiveness of two verbal problem solving strategies: Solve It! and CUBES

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find which problem solving strategy was more effective for special education students in the general education classroom; CUBES or Solve It! The students completed a pre-test, solving five single step and five multi-step word problems. The students then received four instructional and activity sessions on the CUBES and Solve It! strategies. The results indicated that the six fourth grade special education participants increased their problem solving skills after using each strategy. The Solve It! strategy resulted in a larger increase then the CUBES strategy. The students showed a slightly larger decrease in the number of single step incorrect problems using the Solve It! strategy. The CUBES strategy showed a slightly larger decrease in the number of multi-step problems incorrect. The research demonstrated that the use of CUBES and Solve It! was beneficially to the special education students who receive their math instruction in the general education classroom. This study demonstrated the high demand for all students to develop successful problem solving skills. The research also indicated that with the use of a problem solving strategy, special education students can increase their problem solving abilities. Further research is needed to determine all the factors that lead to an increase in the students’ problem solving abilities

    Similar works