Previous studies on the measurement of learning-by-doing emphasize the importance of accounting
for multi-vintage effects having an impact on firms’ production costs through economies
of scope. This study shows that accounting for cannibalization effects on the demand side is
equally important for the adequate measurement of learning. Since multi-vintage firms anticipate
the demand-side cannibalization effects in their production optimization, a previously omitted incentive
to decrease production is captured having an impact on the measurement of learning by
doing. We derive an empirical model from a dynamic oligopoly game of learning-by-doing and
allow cannibalization effects to enter from the demand side. Using quarterly firm-level data for
the dynamic random access memory semiconductor industry, we find support for cannibalization
effects entering firms’ pricing relations resulting in higher estimated learning effects