Intermittent vs. Continuous Water Supply: What benefits do households actually receive? Evidence from two cities in India

Abstract

Almost all urban water systems in South Asia provide intermittent water supply. Intermittent supply can impair water quality and cause users to adopt costly coping mechanisms. In 2009, Nagpur and Amravati, two cities in Maharashtra, India, began offering continuous water supply to pilot areas, hoping to improve water access, water quality and reduce household storage, treatment, and collection of water from alternate sources. Using a mixed-methods approach that used a billing panel dataset from Amravati and as well as utility staff and household interviews in both cities, continuous water supply was found to increase water demand compared to intermittent supply, especially among slum households, although storage and treatment practices fort he most part remained unchanged while other water collection activities were not eliminated. The results indicate that many of the purported benefits of continuous water supply do not accrue automatically to the consumer.Master of City and Regional Plannin

    Similar works