New administrative procedure and new administrative dispute resolution in Croatia- Some implications of differentiation in regulating the subject of administration dispute resolution under the supervision of the legality of administrative activity

Abstract

Autor u analizi odredaba o upravnom sporu u Zakonu o općem upravnom postupku ((NN-47/09, Z.U.P.-09) i i recentnog Zakona o upravnom sporu (NN-20/10, Z.U.S.-10) pokazuje na nekoliko razlika. Prvo, dpk je ZUP (2009) regulirao slučajeve ‘’otvorenosti pravnog puta do upravnog spora’’ dotle ZUS (2010) regulira ‘’svrhu i predmete upravnog spora’’. Drugo, u reguliranju otvorenosti pravnog puta u upravnom sporu prepliću se značajne konceptualne kategorije i dis-harmonija. Treće, autor postavlja pitanje o tome koje će važne implikacije takva situacija imati na primjenu sveobuhvatne sudske kontrole djelovanja tijela javne vlasti.Analysis of the rules of the new General Administrative Procedure Act (NN-47/09, Z.U.P.-09)and the somewhat more recent Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (NN-20/10, Z.U.S.-10) related to administrative dispute shows firstly that Z.U.P.-09 regulates cases of the ‘openness of the legal path of administrative dispute’ as opposed to Z.U.S.-10 which regulates the ‘purpose and subjects of administrative dispute.’ Secondly, in regulation of the openness of the legal path in administration dispute of the concerned purpose and subject of administration dispute, the crossroads of those two acts display significant conceptual categories of dis-harmonisation. Thirdly, what significant implications will it have in the implementation of the all general judicial supervision of the activity of public-legal bodies