Catholic Faculty of Theology, University of Zagreb
Abstract
U ovom prilogu autor polazi od činjenice da je pastoral u permanentnoj potrazi za razumijevanjem čovjeka u njegovu vremenu i kulturno-socijalnom okružju te što adekvatnijim oblicima posredovanja poklada vjere. U brizi za čovjeka pastoral će se nužno osloniti na dijalog s ostalim disciplinama, uz ostale i psihologiju odnosno psihoterapiju čije oblike u nekoj mjeri već i poznaje kroz svoju dugotrajnu pastoralnu praksu; ravnopravni bi dijalog među raznim disciplinama pridonio ne samo blagostanju čovjeka, nego eventualno otvorio nove perspektive respektivnih znanosti, bez posizanja na područja kompetencije druge.
Perspektivu dijalogu autor otvara činjenicom da pastoral u psihoterapiji neće imati uniformnog partnera, pa prelazi u sumarnim crtama rađanje i povijest suvremene psihoterapije ukazujući, u drugom dijelu članka, na razloge šarolikosti psihoterapeutske ponude te smjernice njihova etabliranja. Treći se dio priloga bavi činjenicom da ne samo psihoterapeutska scena nego i stanje unutar jednog psihoterapeutskog smjera ne mora izgledati monolitan, nego doživljava čitav niz razvoja i odmaka od izvornih postavki. U tu su svrhu, tek reprezentativno, uzeta četiri bloka psihoterapija: psihoanaliza, bihevioralna psihoterapija s »kognitivnim zaokretom«, psihoterapija usmjerena na osobu klijenta te Gestalt; sve one pokazuju unutarnje propitivanje glede senzibilnosti i učinkovitosti vlastite psihoterapeutske ponude osobi u njezinom vremenu i konkretnom kulturnom i socijalnom okružju.
Razvoj je psihoterapije podložan utjecajima dostignuća ostalih znanosti, na primjer genetike, psihosomatike, čija dostignuća fasciniraju, pokazuju na moguće razumijevanje izvjesnih činjenica psihološke dimenzije, ali potrebuju preispitivanja eventualnih konzekvencija po implicitnu sliku o čovjeku koju ovakvi rezultati postuliraju i u shvaćanju drugih disciplina eventualno podsvjesno moduliraju. U dijalogu s drugim disciplinama, psihologija propituje utjecaj razvoja ekonomije tj. društva na identitet i spolni identitet, na što pastoral jednako tako mora biti pozoran.
Autor, u završnom dijelu, ukazuje na neke od mogućih smjernica paritetskom dijalogu pastorala i psihoterapije na obostranu korist, uzimajući u obzir analizu prethodnih poglavlja; dijalog bi trebao pridonijeti smanjenju obostranih predrasuda i koordiniranom djelovanju na dobrobit čovjeka.In this article, the author starts from the fact that the pastorale is in continual search to understand man in his time and cultural-social surrounding and for the most adequate forms of mediation of faith. In his carefor man, the pastorale will necessarily lean on dialogue with other disciplines, amongst else, psychology, that is, psychotherapy which in some way, he already recognises and knows through his own experience of pastoral practise. Equal dialogue between various disciplines would contribute not only to man\u27s prosperity, but would eventually open up new perspectives to the respective sciences without interfering in the area of competencies of the other.
The author opens the perspective of dialogue with the fact that pastorale will not find an equal partner in psychotherapy and so the author presents a summary of the emergence and history of modem psychotherapy while in the second section he points out the reasons for the variety of psychotherapy being offered and the directions of its establishment. The third section of the article deals with the fact that not only do the psychotherapy scene, but also the state within a particular direction of psychotherapy need not appear monolithic but instead a experiences an entire series of developments and distancing from the original hypothesis. In that regard, four blocks of psychotherapy are brieffy taken: psychoanalysis, behavioural psychotherapy with a »cognitive turnabout«, psychotherapy directed to the person client and Gestalt. All these indicate an internal questioning regarding sensibility and effectiveness of one\u27s own psychotherapeutic offer to apers on in their time and concrete cultural and social surrounding.
The development of psychotherapy is susceptible to the influence of achievement in other sciences, for example, genetics, psychosomatics, where achievements are fascinating and point out a possible comprehension of certain facts of the psychological dimension but also the need to re-question any possible consequences to the implicit image of man that these results postulate and of the understanding of other disciplines that are eventually unconsciously modulated. In a dialogue with other disciplines, psychology questions the influence on the development of the economy, that is, society, on the identity and sexual identity, which is something the pastorale needs to keep in mind too.
In conclusion the author points out some of the possible directions in the parity of dialogue between the pastorale and psychotherapy mutual benefit, keeping in mind the analysis of the preceding chapter; dialogue should contribute to decreasing mutual prejudices and should co-ordinate their activities to the benefit of man
