I consider the elicitation of ambiguous beliefs about an event and show how
to identify the interval of relevant probabilities (representing ambiguity
perception) for several classes of ambiguity averse preferences. The agent
reveals her preference for mixing binarized bets on the uncertain event and its
complement under varying betting odds. Under ambiguity aversion, mixing is
informative about the interval of beliefs. In particular, the mechanism allows
to distinguish ambiguous beliefs from point beliefs, and identifies the belief
interval for maxmin preferences. For ambiguity averse smooth second order and
variational preferences, the mechanism reveals inner bounds for the belief
interval, which are sharp under additional assumptions. In an experimental
study, participants perceive almost as much ambiguity for natural events
(generated by the stock exchange and by a prisoners dilemma game) as for the
Ellsberg Urn, indicating that ambiguity may play a role in real-world decision
making