Barthelmie, R.

Brand, A.

Ejsing Jørgensen, Hans

Moriarty, P.

Rodrigo, J.S.

Online Research Database In Technology

                       General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.  • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal   If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.     Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Dec 18, 2017WAKEBENCH. A new IEA Task for the Benchmarking of Wind Farm Flow ModelsRodrigo, J.S.; Moriarty, P.; Barthelmie, R.; Brand, A.; Ejsing Jørgensen, HansPublication date:2011Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordLink back to DTU OrbitCitation (APA):Rodrigo, J. S., Moriarty, P., Barthelmie, R., Brand, A., & Ejsing Jørgensen, H. (2011). WAKEBENCH. A new IEATask for the Benchmarking of Wind Farm Flow Models. Poster session presented at EERA Workshop on WindConditions, Porto, Portugal.IEA Wind - Task 31 WAKEBENCH: Benchmarking of wind farm flow models Javier Sanz Rodrigo (CENER)Patrick Moriarty (NREL)Rebecca Barthelmie (Indiana Univ.)Hans E. Jørgensen (Risø-DTU)Arno J. Brand (ECN)Porto, 26-01-2011MotivationClassical wind farm models, typically based on linearized and algebraic approximations, are being complemented with a large variety of numerical models based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) More realistic description of the flow behavior around complex terrain/wind farm topologies    More degrees of freedom in the modeling chain  more flexibility for the developer and end-user More training/experience requirements  More user-dependency Lack of traceability Need for quality-checked “best practice” procedures for… The evaluation of the numerical models The validation and verification strategy The selection and definition of test cases for validationEU TPWind 3% Vision: Model uncertainties below 3% by 2030 regardless of site conditions  Realistically the vision is now around 30%  long way to go!Main ObjectiveTo improve wind farm modeling techniques and provide a forum for industrial, governmental and academic partners to develop, evaluate and improve atmospheric boundary layer and wind turbine wake models for use in wind energy  from flat to complex terrain, from single to multiple wakes, both onshore and offshore, using well defined test cases from the literature and test wind farms (“research” conditions) as well as from industrial sites (“real-life” conditions)Aligned with the activities of Working Group 2 of the EERA WindConditions sub-programme.  Investigation of the model chain Evaluation of model performance and uncertainties using the data generated by WG1Model Evaluation Procedures: MetricsWhat makes one modelling approach better than the other?Initial deliverable will be a consensus on metrics used for comparing data to simulationsTest Cases. Example 1: ABL modelsSingle-column model intercomparison for stably stratifiedAtmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) (Cuxart et al., 2005) ABL parameterizations from the major climate research centres First-order (RANS-type) and LES turbulence closures Very large dispersion of results!LESRANSTest Cases. Example 2: Complex TerrainBolund experiment and blind comparison (Bechmann et al., 2009) Well defined boundary conditions 52 model runs: RANS, LES and wind tunnel models Very large dispersion of results! Errors in wind speed ~ 15%“WINDBENCH” Web PortalAdministrator: CENERTest Case PortalTest Case ManagerTest Case ManagerTest Case ManagerRegistered Users ReportsScientific CommitteeMonitoringRepositoryBenchmark of Models and Test Cases• State-of-the-art models• Good practice procedures• StandardsDissemination• e-News• Forums• Workshops• R&D ProjectsStatus and OutlookIEA Task 31 was approved by the IEA-Wind ExCo in October 2010The Task has two operating agents Javier Sanz (CENER), to take the overall management of the Task and the “wind” programme Patrick Moriarty (NREL), to manage the “wake” programmeNow assembling participants from IEA-Wind countries Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Denmark, European Comission, EWEA, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States 28 expressions of interest received so far from 12 countriesNegotiation with IEA members for budget allocation under wayTask 31 to effectively start in the second half of 2011 

WAKEBENCH. A new IEA Task for the Benchmarking of Wind Farm Flow Models

http://orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/5567847/Barthelmie_presentation.pdf

WAKEBENCH. A new IEA Task for the Benchmarking of Wind Farm Flow Models

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Online Research Database In Technology