Borzi, Peter

Caione, Paolo

Chiarenza, Fabio

Escolino, Maria

Esposito, Ciro

Miyano, Go

Mushtaq, Imran

Riccipetitoni, Giovanna

Yamataka, Atsuyuki

Very limited informations are currently available about the best approach to perform retroperitoneoscopic surgery. This multicentric international study aimed to compare the outcome of lateral versus prone approach for retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in children.

METHODS:
The records of 164 patients underwent RPN in 7 international centers of pediatric surgery over the last 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-one patients (42 girls and 19 boys, average age 3.8 years) were operated using lateral approach (G1), whereas 103 patients (66 girls and 37 boys, average age 3.0 years) underwent prone RPN (G2). The two groups were compared in regard to operative time, postoperative outcome, postoperative complications, and re-operations.

RESULTS:
The average operative time was significantly shorter in G2 (99 min) compared to G1 (160 min) (p = 0.001). Only 2 lateral RPN required conversion to open surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups as for intraoperative complications (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:6/103, 5.8%; p = 0.48), postoperative complications (G1:9/61, 14.7%; G2:17/103, 16.5%; p = 0.80), and re-operations (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:4/103, 3.8%; p = 0.85). Regarding postoperative complications, the incidence of symptomatic residual distal ureteric stumps (RDUS) was significantly higher in G2 (7/103, 6.8%) compared to G1 (1/61, 1.6%) (p = 0.001). Most re-operations (4/6, 66.6%) were performed to remove a RDUS .

CONCLUSIONS:
Both lateral and prone approach are feasible and reasonably safe to perform RPN in children but the superiority of one approach over another is not still confirmed. Although prone technique resulted faster compared to lateral approach, the choice of the technique remains dependent on the surgeon's personal preference and experience. Our results would suggest that the lateral approach should be preferred to the prone technique when a longer ureterectomy is required, for example in cases of vesico-ureteral reflux into the affected kidney moiety, in order to avoid to leave a long ureteric stump that could become symptomatic and require a re-intervention

Maria Escolino

Giovanna Riccipetitoni

Atsuyuki Yamataka

Imran Mushtaq

Go Miyano

Paolo Caione

Fabio Chiarenza

Peter Borzi

Ciro Esposito

Archivio della ricerca - Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II

Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach.

https://www.iris.unina.it/retrieve/handle/11588/725999/210129/RPN%20Surg%20Endosc%202018.pdf

Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach.

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Archivio della ricerca - Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II