Brummel, Bradley J.

Gunsalus, C. K.

Kristich, Kerri L.

Loui, Michael C.

English

ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst

University of Massachusetts AmherstScholarWorks@UMass AmherstEthics in Science and Engineering NationalClearinghouse Science, Technology and Society Initiative4-18-2008Development and Assessment of Role-PlayScenarios for Teaching RCRMichael C. LouiUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignBradley J. BrummelUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignC. K. GunsalusUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignKerri L. KristichUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignFollow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/esencePart of the Engineering Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and MathematicsCommons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences CommonsThis Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Science, Technology and Society Initiative at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It hasbeen accepted for inclusion in Ethics in Science and Engineering National Clearinghouse by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst. For more information, please contact scholarworks@library.umass.edu.Recommended CitationDevelopment and assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research, First Biennial Responsible Conductof Research Education, Instruction, and Training Conference, St. Louis, April 17-19, 2008.Development and Assessment of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching RCR Michael C. Loui, Bradley J. Brummel, C. K. Gunsalus, & Kerri L. KristichApril 18, 2008Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant EEC-0628814Overview Program Description  Topics Materials Participate in a Role-Play Current Findings Impressions of Participants Future Directions Interviews Useable Packets2Role-Plays of Research Ethics    National Science Foundation Ethics Education in Science and Engineering Program  Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible d hCon uct of Researc                 M. C. Loui and C. K. Gunsalus, co-PIs          Bradley Brummel and Kerri Kristich RAs    ,  Approved by the campus Institutional Review Board 3Role-Play Topics  Authorship Peer Review Mentoringli Conf ct of Interest Human Subjects Animal Subjects  Hazardous Materials Whistleblowing – Professional Relationships* Whislteblowing – Data Management4Components of the Role-Plays    Moderator Materials Possible role-play formats Questions to ask and facilitation advice Examples of the RCR situation from the media Roles Professor Graduate Student Observer,  ,  Party Favor Description of scenario and real story      Useful citations and Web sites5Running the Role-Play   Each group must have a professor role and a         student role Some groups will have an observer Run role-play Read and prepare your role ~5 min. Role-play the meeting ~7 min. Use discussion starter if needed Summary of discussions6Current Findings  Approximately 435 UIUC graduate students       Role-plays described as involving and memorable Leads to good discussions    Some students felt uncomfortable or didn’t take it seriously Unfamiliarity with role-playing Actual difficulties similar to a real situation M t id th l l th hil (75%)os  sa  e ro e-p ays were wor w e  More effective than a lecture or case study covering the same topic, but only one topic gets covered7Future Directions  Interviews with case analysis to test if role-plays teach graduate students to: Identify moral issues Understand multiple perspectives   Negotiate practical solutions Change conceptions of RCRR t i k l d d kill e a n now e ge an  s s Develop useable role-play packets for other RCR educators Questions/Comments?8

Development and Assessment of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching RCR

https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1277&context=esence

Development and Assessment of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching RCR

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst