E. P. Hu

G. Malmros

G. Q. Hu

Hui Li

J. S. O. Evans

Jiong Duan

K. D. M. Harris

L. D. Ma

M. A. Neumann

M. G. Sheldrick

M. J. Tremayne

O. V. Dolomanov

P. Guo

Ping Guo

Puttaraja

Qiang Cheng

QingQing Pan

R. B. Wei

W. I. F. David

X. R. Lei

Crossref

    © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com csb.scichina.com   www.springer.com/scp                       *Corresponding author (email: lihuilab@sina.com) Article SPECIAL TOPICS:  Analytical Chemistry October 2012  Vol.57  No.30: 38673871  doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5245-5 Comparative crystal structure determination of griseofulvin:  Powder X-ray diffraction versus single-crystal X-ray diffraction PAN QingQing, GUO Ping, DUAN Jiong, CHENG Qiang & LI Hui* College of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China Received February 15, 2012; accepted March 31, 2012; published online June 29, 2012  In an attempt to compare crystal structure determination from powder data and single-crystal data, crystal structure of griseofulvin (C17H17ClO6) was tested by both powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Lattice parameters of griseofulvin are α=90.0°, a=b=8.9757 Å, c=19.9345 Å, V=1605.99 Å3 from powder data coinciding with α=90.0°, a=b=8.9714 Å, c=19.8848 Å, V=1600.46 Å3 from single-crystal data. Main processes of structure elucidating of griseofulvin by the two approaches were analyzed. Powder X-ray diffraction was demonstrated to be a powerful auxiliary implement to single-crystal X-ray diffraction in structure charac-terization, and its application can be popularized in the field of structure research of small organic molecules. griseofulvin, crystal structure, powder X-ray diffraction, single-crystal X-ray diffraction  Citation:  Pan Q Q, Guo P, Duan J, et al. Comparative crystal structure determination of griseofulvin: Powder X-ray diffraction versus single-crystal X-ray diffrac-tion. Chin Sci Bull, 2012, 57: 38673871, doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5245-5    Powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction are the two main methods in the field researching crystal structures of materials. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction is regarded to be the most powerful technique for elucidating crystal struc-tures [1]. For structures with less than 100 atoms in the asymmetric unit, single-crystal techniques are always guaran- teed to be successful with accurate parameters of cell di-mensions [2]. However, many materials cannot be prepared in the form of single-crystal of sufficient size or stability for investigation using single-crystal X-ray diffraction tech-niques. Even if the single-crystal can be obtained, culturing single-crystal can be very time consuming. Therefore, apply-ing powder X-ray diffraction techniques becomes essential to studying the structural properties of certain materials. Although structure determination by powder X-ray diffrac-tion may not be as accurate as that by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, improvements will likely be achieved through future advancements in instrumentation and algorithm de-velopment [2]. Harris et al. [3], Evans et al. [4] and Tremayne [5] are crystal researchers who have provided important insight into the importance of powder X-ray dif-fraction for many years and have propelled its application. Crystal structure of Jatrorrhizine chloride has been de-termined using both powder X-ray diffraction data and sin-gle-crystal X-ray diffraction data by Lei et al. [6] in 2009. The results from the two methods correlate with each other very well. To further investigate the comparison between powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction we chose grise-ofulvin [7], crystal structure of which was determined by Puttaraja et al. [8] and Malmros et al. [9] from single-crystal diffraction data, as the researching material. Because regu-lar griseofulvin crystals can be easily obtained in conven-tional circumstance for single-crystal X-ray diffraction and it has a rigid molecular structure (Figure 1) which can con-tribute to successful structure determination by powder X-ray diffraction. The fact that results by the two techniques are identical demonstrates that powder X-ray diffraction can be as accurate as single-crystal X-ray diffraction in order to determine the crystal structure of griseofulivin. In addition, investigators in our laboratory have successfully determined the crystal structure of 7-amino-3-desacetoxy cephalospo-ranic acid [10] and β-cyclodextrin-p-aminobenzoic acid  3868 Pan Q Q, et al.   Chin Sci Bull   October (2012) Vol.57 No.30  Figure 1  Molecular structure of griseofulvin. inclusion complex [11] from powder X-ray diffraction data. Therefore we can further verify the accuracy of powder X-ray diffraction to determine the crystal structure of small organic molecules. 1  Experimental (i) Crystallization.  Griseofulvin, with the purity of more than 99%, was purchased from Zhuhai Yuancheng Pharma-cetical & Chemical Co., Ltd, China. The saturated solution of dimethy sulfoxide with griseofulvin was prepared at 70°C, and colorless block-like crystals of griseofulvin were obtained after the solution being cooled to 25°C. Regular crystals were selected for the single-crystal X-ray diffrac-tion, and the others were grinded into powders for the pow-der X-ray diffraction. (ii) Powder X-ray diffraction.  Powder X-ray diffraction data were collected on X’Pert Pro MPD diffractometer (PANalytical) using Cu Kα radiation (λ1=0.154056 nm) with X’celerator detector. The diffraciton data were record-ed at 293 K with a stepsize of 0.01313° and a counting time 10.16 ms per step in the 2θ range of 5°50°. The crystal structure determination of griseofulvin directly from powder diffraction data was conducted with Material Studio 4.2 (Accelrys Co., Ltd. USA) and direct space approach was chosen to solve the crystal structure then Rietveld method [12] was used to refine the crystal structure of griseofulivn. (iii) Single-crystal X-ray diffraction.  Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected on Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Nova with Mo Kα radiation (λ1=0.071073 nm) at 293 K and the θ range of 3.05°28.77°. Then single-crystal structure of griseofulvin was determined by program Olex2-1.1 [13] which can call the program SHELX, while the structure was solved by direct approach, and refined with the SHELX-97 program. 2  Results and discussion 2.1  Indexing For single-crystal diffraction, the diffraction intensities are distributed in three-dimensional space, and the indexing is conducted by searching orientation matrix. In the process of collecting single-crystal diffraction data indexing results were obtained with a tetragonal cell, P41 space group and lattice parameters α=90.0°, a=b=8.9714 Å, c=19.8848 Å, V=1600.46 Å3. But the diffraction intensities are distributed in one dimensional space for the powder diffraction data, so peaks overlap in the powder diffraction pattern always makes the information on the individual diffraction intensity obscured. As a consequence, indexing is always deemed to be the bottleneck for crystal structure determination from powder X-ray diffraction data. In this work, in order to suc-cessfully index the powder diffraction pattern, the pattern was pretreated by calculating and subtracting the back-ground then smoothing before stripping Kα2 radiation. Dif-fraction peaks were searched automatically based on the Savitsky-Golay method. Indexing was carried out using peak positions read from the powder diffraction profiles by X-CELL method [14] then the indexing result was refined with the type of Pawley. This returned a tetragonal cell and P41 space group with lattice parameters α=90.0°, a=b=8.9757 Å, c=19.9345 Å, V=1605.99 Å3. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data are collected in three-dimensional space, but the data comes from one crystal, so the data may be contingent. Though powder X-ray diffraction data are collected from the compressing one dimensional space, they are statistics of numerous crystals. Therefore, the compara-tive indexing accuracy of the two diffraction methods re-quires an additional characterization step. 2.2  Structure solution Direct space approach was chosen when structure solution of powder X-ray diffraction was executed. In direct space approach for solving crystal structure from powder diffrac-tion data, appropriate trial structures were important for the subsequent work. For griseofulvin, all chemical bonds are covalent, so the bond length as well as the bond angle of each kind of these covalent bonds range more slightly than that of ionic bonds, consequently an approximately reaso- nable molecular structure of griseofulvin can be built and optimized by software based on quantum mechanics, mo-lecular mechanics and so on. On the other hand, for the or-ganic molecules, IR, MS, NMR and other methods can also provide structural information which can be utilized to build the trial structures. Herein, the structure of griseofulvin was created by Visual module in Materials Studio 4.2. The geo- metry of the structure was then optimized by minimizing its energy based on molecular mechanics simulation, and the final total potential energy was –12.204 kcal mol–1 while the optimized structure and atomic labels of griseofulvin are shown in Figure 2. MC/SA search algorithm in Powder Solve package was used to constantly adjust the confor-mation, position and orientation of the trial model in the unit cell of griseofulvin determined from the indexing step in order to maximize the agreement between the calculated and the measured diffraction data.  Pan Q Q, et al.   Chin Sci Bull   October (2012) Vol.57 No.30 3869  Figure 2  Optimized structure and atomic labels of griseofulvin. As to single-crystal structure solution, direct method im-plemented in the SHELXS [15] program was applied to determine the positions of all atoms in the unit cell on the working platform Olex2-1.1. In the direct approach for solving crystal structure, phase information of various re-flections was obtained from the kinds of diffraction intensi-ties by using mathematical method. Then the electron den-sity distribution in the unit cell can be further obtained from the phase information. Different electron density peaks cor-respond to different atoms, so each atom of griseofulvin was identified according to the electron density and the knowledge of structural chemistry, and the molecular struc-ture of griseofulvin from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data is shown in Figure 3. The identification of atomic types is always thought to be the obstacle in single-crystal X-ray diffraction especially structure of molecules with vast amount of atoms need to be solved, because the electronic density of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen are so similar that it is too difficult to distin-guish them from each other independently. Fortunately, as mentioned above, IR, MS, NMR and other spectroscopy methods can be used as auxiliary implements to determine atom types of organic materials in this step.  2.3  Refinement In order to obtain a satisfactory Rietveld refinement result from powder diffraction data, the initial structural model obtained from the structure solution step must be a suffi-cient representation of the correct structure as Rietveld    Figure 3  Molecular structure of griseofulvin from single-crystal X-ray diffraction. refinement often suffers from problems of instability. In this research, the physically reasonable crystal structure of gris-eofulvin obtained from MC/SA search was subsequently refined by Rietveld refinement techniques based on the measured powder X-ray diffraction pattern. In the Rietveld refinement, variables defining the structural model and the powder diffraction profile were adjusted by least squares methods in order to obtain an optimal fit between the ex-perimental and calculated powder diffraction patterns. The final Rwp of the structure was converged at 5.99%, and the comparison between the measured X-ray diffraction pattern and the calculated pattern is shown in Figure 4. However, for structure refinement from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data, the structural model can sometimes be an incomplete representation of the true structure, be-cause difference Fourier techniques can be adopted in con-junction with Rietveld refinement to complete the structural model. Herein, as the molecular structure of griseofulvin is known, all the atoms were easily identified from the elec-tron density map, and the crystal structure was refined using full-matrix least-squares based on F2 with the program SHELXL [16], and the refinement converged at R1=4.64%. The lattice parameters of griseofulvin from single-crystal X-ray diffraction and powder X-ray diffraction are summa-rized in Table 1(data 4 and powder X-ray diffraction), and according to the research of Wei et al. [17] main functional bonds length and angles were summerized in Table 2. Final crystal structure of griseofulvin from the two technologies are shown in Figure 5, with single-crystal R indices of R1=4.64%, wR2=8.65% and powder R indices of Rp=4.49%, Rwp=5.99%. According to analysis in Table 1, deviations of powder X-ray diffraction from average of single-crystal X-ray diffraction are relatively insignificant, thereby demonstrating the consistency of lattice parameters utilizing the two diffraction techniques. Table 2 shows the structural deviation of griseofulvin, and the modulus of deviation range from 0.09% to 4.21%. The slight difference of mo-lecular structure may be attributed to obscured diffraction intensities which result from three-dimensional single-    Figure 4  Comparison of powder X-ray diffraction pattern. (a) Calculated pattern; (b) measured pattern; (c) difference between measured pattern and calculated pattern. 3870 Pan Q Q, et al.   Chin Sci Bull   October (2012) Vol.57 No.30  Figure 5   Crystal structure of griseofulvin by powder X-ray diffraction (a) and single-crystal X-ray diffraction (b). Table 1  Lattice parametersa) List Single-crystal X-ray diffraction Powder X-ray diffraction Deviation (%) Data 1 Data 2 Data 3 Data 4 Average α (°) 90 90 90 90 90 90 0 a (Å) 8.962 8.967 8.969 8.971 8.967 8.976 0.10 c (Å) 19.895 19.904 19.951 19.885 19.909 19.935 0.13 V (Å3) 1597.92 1600.23 1604.92 1600.46 1600.88 1605.99 0.32 Z 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 a) Data 1, 2 and 3 are from GRISFL, GRISFL02 and GRISFL03 respectively in Cambridge Crystallographic Data Cenetre. Table 2  Bond length and angles for griseofulvin based on both powder X-ray diffraction and single-crystal X-ray diffraction List Single-crystal X-ray diffraction Powder X-ray diffraction Deviation (%) Data 1 Data 2 Data 3 Data 4 Average Bond length (Å) C1–C2 1.5555 1.5643 1.5663 1.5600 1.5615 1.5393 –1.42 C2–C8 1.4479 1.4471 1.4388 1.4468 1.4452 1.4519 0.46 C8–C7 1.3899 1.3959 1.3972 1.3962 1.3948 1.3725 –1.60 C7–O1 1.3620 1.3632 1.3626 1.3631 1.3627 1.3966 2.49 C1–O1 1.4509 1.4486 1.4419 1.4493 1.4477 1.4508 0.21 C1–C12 1.5099 1.5124 1.5101 1.5115 1.5110 1.5393 1.87 C12–C13 1.3379 1.3369 1.3325 1.3363 1.3359 1.3565 1.54 C13–C14 1.4513 1.4455 1.4420 1.4438 1.4456 1.4611 1.07 C14–C15 1.4923 1.5146 1.4890 1.4980 1.4985 1.5081 0.64 C15–C16 1.5209 1.5207 1.5234 1.5238 1.5222 1.5261 0.27 C1–C16 1.5422 1.5442 1.5475 1.5463 1.5451 1.5264 –1.21 Angles (°) C2-C1-O1 105.31 104.75 104.99 105.22 105.07 107.73 2.53 C1-C2-C8 104.98 105.31 105.12 105.12 105.13 100.72 –4.19 C2-C8-C7 106.97 106.81 107.06 107.02 106.97 109.46 2.33 C8-C7-O1 114.90 114.60 114.44 114.62 114.64 113.53 –0.97 C7-O1-C1 107.15 107.74 107.71 107.52 107.53 103.15 –4.03 C12-C1-C16 109.70 109.84 109.66 110.02 109.81 109.22 –0.54 C1-C12-C13 119.74 119.84 120.40 119.83 119.95 122.04 1.74 C12-13-C14 122.39 122.51 121.79 122.53 122.31 122.20 –0.09 C13-C14-C15 118.33 118.29 119.26 118.33 118.55 116.79 –1.48 C14-C15-C16 115.22 114.68 114.97 115.43 115.08 117.83 2.39 C1-C16-C15 109.34 109.16 109.00 108.72 109.06 111.62 2.35  crystal diffraction data into one dimensional powder dif-fraction data. However, the transmission mode and syn-chrotron powder diffraction could be adopted to improve the resolution of the powder diffraction data, which will further improve the accuracy of the structure determination from powder diffraction data. 3  Conclusions Based on our analysis, comparative crystal structure deter-mination of griseofulvin, single-crystal X-ray diffraction has validated the accuracy of powder X-ray diffraction. It can be demonstrated that developments in laboratory pow-der X-ray diffraction as well as computational methods and X-ray resources over recent years have greatly promoted the development of powder X-ray diffraction. As a result, powder X-ray diffraction can be a powerful auxiliary im-plement to single-crystal X-ray diffraction in structure elu-cidating. Furthermore, the application of powder X-ray dif-fraction can be popularized in the field of structural eluci-dating of small organic molecules.  Pan Q Q, et al.   Chin Sci Bull   October (2012) Vol.57 No.30 3871 1 Harris K D M, Tremayne M, Kariuki B M. Contemporary advances in the use of powder X-Ray diffraction for structure determination. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2001, 40: 1626–1651 2 David W I F, Shankland K, McCusker L B, et al. Structure Determi-nation from Powder Diffraction Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006 3 Harris K D M, Cheung E Y. How to determine structures when single crystals cannot be grown: Opportunities for structure determination of molecular materials using powder diffraction data. Chem Soc Rev, 2004, 33: 526–538 4 Evans J S O, Evans I R. Beyond classical applications of powder dif-fraction. Chem Soc Rev, 2004, 33: 539–547 5 Tremayne M J. The impact of powder diffraction on the structural characterization of organic crystalline materials. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A, 2004, 362: 2691–2707 6 Lei X R, Yang J H, Lin X, et al. Crystal structure determination of Jatrorrhinzine chloride. Chin Sci Bull, 2009, 54: 3244–3248 7 Hu G Q, Li H, Wang X J, et al. Measurement and correlation of gris-eofulvin solubility in different solvents at temperature from (281.95 to 357.60) K. J Chem Eng Data, 2010, 55: 3969–3971 8 Puttaraja, Nirmala K A, Sakegowda D S. Crystal structure of griseo-fulvin. J Crystallogr Spectrom Res, 1982, 12: 415–423 9 Malmros G, Wagner A, Maron L. (2S,6'R)-7-chloro-2',4,6,-trime- thoxy-6'-methyl-spiro-(benzofuran-2(3H),2-(2')cyclohexene)-3,4'-dione CI7HI7ClO6. Cryst Struct Commun, 1977, 6: 463–470 10 Hu E P, Cheng Q, Guo L H, et al. Crystal structure determination of 7-ADCA based on X-ray powder diffraction. Chin Sci Bull, 2006, 51: 2421–2424 11 Guo P, Su Y H, Cheng Q, et al. Crystal structure determination of the β-cyclodextrin-p-aminobenzoic acid inclusion complex from powder X-ray diffraction data. Carbohydrate Res, 2011, 346: 986–990 12 Ma L D. Neoteric X-Ray Polycrystalline Diffraction. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004 13 Dolomanov O V, Bourhis L J, Gildea R J, et al. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J Appl Cryst, 2009, 42: 339–341 14 Neumann M A. X-cell: A novel indexing algorithm for routine tasks and difficult cases. J Appl Crystallogr, 2003, 36: 356–365  15 Sheldrick M G. SHELXS-97: Program for Crystal Structure Solution. Gotingen: University of Gotingen, 1997 16 Sheldrick M G. SHELXL-97: Program for Crystal Structure Refine-ment. Gotingen: University of Gotingen, 1997 17 Wei R B, Liu Y, Liang Y. Researching progress of pesticides con-taining spiral structure. Chin J Org Chem, 2009, 3: 476–487  Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. 

Chinese Science Bulletin

Comparative crystal structure determination of griseofulvin: Powder X-ray diffraction versus single-crystal X-ray diffraction

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11434-012-5245-5.pdf

Comparative crystal structure determination of griseofulvin: Powder X-ray diffraction versus single-crystal X-ray diffraction

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref