An assessment of  radiofrequency  exposure due to GSM 900 and GSM 1800 was  carried out at 30 

strategic  locations  in  the  University  College  Hospital  (UCH),  Ibadan  with  a  frequency  selective  spectrum 

analyzer (SPECTRAN HF 60105). The Spectrum analyzer was coupled to a calibrated Omnidirectional antenna 

to obtain a spatial power density for each location.  The mean power densities of 38.37µW/m

2

and  8.68µW/m

2

and  maximum  power  densities  of 212.40µW/m

2

and  67.40µW/m

2

were  obtained  for  GSM 900  and  GSM  1800 

respectively. The standard deviation of 51.3 µW/m

2 

and 14.90µW/m

2 

were also obtained for GSM 900 and GSM 

1800 respectively. GSM 900 and GSM 1800 respectively show compliance level of 0.0047% and 0.00075%   with 

the ICNIRP reference level

Ajiboye, Y.

Osiele, M. O.

Afe Babalola University Repository

IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-ISSN: 2278-4861. Volume 4, Issue 2 (Jul. - Aug. 2013), PP 44-48 www.iosrjournals.org www.iosrjournals.org                                                        44 | Page  Assessment of Spatial Exposure to RF Radiation due to GSM 900 and GSM1800 – A Case Study of UCH, Ibadan, Nigeria  Y. Ajiboye, M.Sc.1; M. O. Osiele, Ph.D.2; 1(Department of Physics, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria) 2(Department of Physics, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria)  Abstract: An assessment of radiofrequency exposure due to GSM 900 and GSM 1800 was carried out at 30 strategic locations in the University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan with a frequency selective spectrum analyzer (SPECTRAN HF 60105). The Spectrum analyzer was coupled to a calibrated Omnidirectional antenna to obtain a spatial power density for each location. The mean power densities of 38.37µW/m2and 8.68µW/m2 and maximum power densities of 212.40µW/m2and 67.40µW/m2 were obtained for GSM 900 and GSM 1800 respectively. The standard deviation of 51.3 µW/m2 and 14.90µW/m2 were also obtained for GSM 900 and GSM 1800 respectively. GSM 900 and GSM 1800 respectively show compliance level of 0.0047% and 0.00075% with the ICNIRP reference level. Keywords – power density, GSM, radiofrequency, exposure, spectrum analyzer    I. Introduction  All over the world, the number of users of mobile telephone technology has increased and the number is on the increase on daily basis, and health concerns about the associated radiofrequency (RF) exposure have been raised, particularly because the mobile phone handset operates in close proximity to the human body, and also because large numbers of base station antennas are required to provide widespread availability of service to large populations.  Mobile telephony is relied on by over 1.4 billion people, or around 20% of the world’s population [1].   In Nigeria and many other parts of the world, radiofrequency transmission from base stations antennas are transmitted in the region of 900 Mega Hertz (designated as GSM 900) and 1,800 Mega Hertz (designated as GSM 1800). Base stations are designed to transmit radiofrequency radiation continuously even when nobody is making call with a mobile phone [2]. One can therefore say that exposure from the base station antennas is continuous and whole body to the entire community. Exposure from the handsets is intermittent, controllable and mainly to the hand and the head but can be more intense because of the closeness to the two organs [3].   Electromagnetic radiation consists of waves of electric and magnetic energy moving together through space at the speed of light. Taken together, all forms of electromagnetic energy are referred to as the electromagnetic spectrum. Radio waves and microwaves emitted by transmitting antennas are one form of electromagnetic energy. Often the term electromagnetic field or radiofrequency (RF) field may be used to indicate the presence of electromagnetic or RF energy. The RF part of the electromagnetic spectrum is generally defined as that part of the spectrum where electromagnetic waves have frequencies in the range of about 3 kilohertz (3 kHz) to 300 gigahertz (300 GHz). Usually, a typical RF measuring device measures in the far field either the electric field strength E or magnetic field strength H component of the electromagnetic wave and converts it to power density S measured in Watts per square meter (W/m2) using the relation:       𝑆 = 𝐸𝐻 =  𝐸2377= 377𝐻2        (1) where 377 is the characteristic impedance of free space [4].   Most radiation safety surveys that have been carried out have been with an electromagnetic meter which is a non-frequency selective measuring instrument [5]. The results obtained from the surveys are broadband measurement results which have not solitarily addressed the radiation from GSM 900 and GSM 1800. A spatial frequency-selective measurement of radiation from GSM is therefore expedient.   It is established that radiofrequency fields can transfer its energy to biological matter leading to the increment in the medium temperature with the vibration of atoms and molecules [6]. Temperature rise occurs, either whole body or localized, when the body absorbs energy faster than its thermoregulatory system. An unacceptable heat stress results when the heat load due to absorption of radiofrequency energy lead to an increased body temperature of 1oC or more [7]. Restrictions are therefore purely thermally based, that is, they simply limit the intensity of the radiation to ensure that the amount of tissue heating caused by absorption of microwave radiation is not in excess of what the body’s thermoregulatory mechanism can cope with [8].  Therefore, these restrictions on the effects of exposure are based on established health effects and are Submitted Date 27 June 2013                                                         Accepted Date: 02 July 2013 Assessment of Spatial Exposure to RF Radiation due to GSM 900 and GSM1800 – A Case Study of  www.iosrjournals.org                                                        45 | Page termed basic restrictions. Depending on frequency, the physical quantities used to specify the basic restrictions on exposure to EMF are current density, Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), and power density. Protection against adverse health effects requires that these basic restrictions are not exceeded. Reference levels of exposure are provided for comparison with measured values of physical quantities [9].   The objective of this radiofrequency field study was to obtain radiofrequency data and statistical evaluation of exposure due to radiofrequency radiation from GSM 900 and GSM 1800 and to compare the obtained result with international standards.    II. Materials And Methods  Spatial measurements of power densities at thirty locations were made with a calibrated omnidirectional antenna (Omnilog 90200) with frequency range 700MHz to 2.5GHz coupled with an Aaronia AG Spectrum Analyzer (Spectran HF 60105). An Etrex Vista Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to determine the geographic coordinate for each location.   The Spectrum Analyzer was placed on a 1.5m high tripod stand – the height within the trunk of the body where most of radiation is absorbed and each measurement was taken for an average time of six (6) minutes, which is to account for the average time it takes the thermoregulatory mechanism of the human body to maintain thermal equilibrium.  The areas where the survey was carried out are shown in Table 1. Fig. 1 shows the spatial measurement locations of the study area.    Table 1: Features of Study Area Location Area  Long (East) Lat (North) 1 UCH North West (Top Floor) 3.90150 7.40230 2 UCH North West (Ground floor) 3.90085 7.40304 3 UCH kidney Centre 3.90175 7.39920 4 UCH West 4 Ward(Top floor) 3.90181 7.40252 5 UCH East 4 Ward(Top floor) 3.90263 7.40245 6 UCH Medical Museum (Top) 3.90234 7.40306 7 UCH Paul Hendrickse Hall 3.90102 7.40234 8 UCH Audit Dept 3.90235 7.40254 9 UCH Mortuary 3.90267 7.40259 10 UCH Emergency Unit 3.90369 7.40183 11 UCH Idea Konsult 3.89881 7.40317 12 UCH Christ Chapel 3.89996 7.40058 13 UCH Nuclear Medicine 3.89956 7.40348 14 UCH College of Med. Auditorium 3.90074 7.40166 15 UCH CMD’s Guest House  3.90479 7.39944 16 UCH New Geriatric Centre 3.90338 7.40061 17 UCH Near Gate 1 3.90814 7.40216 18 UCH Pry School 3.90869 7.40124 19 UCH Samtosh Salon Area 3.90687 7.40193 20 UCH School of Nursing hostel 3.90178 7.40415 21 UCH near Cultural Centre 3.89775 7.40269 22 UCH UBA Bank 3.89911 7.40151 23 UCH Main Gate 3.90296 7.40035 24 UCH Soweto Hostel 3.90836 7.40371 25 UCH Alexander Brown Hall  3.90593 7.40444 26 UCH Football Field  3.90244 7.40504 27 UCH Near Gate 2 (GA Quarters) 3.90906 7.40022 28 UCH Circular Road (Qtr 2) 3.90774 7.40114 29 UCH Water Storage Tank 3.90490 7.40265 30 UCH Circular Road (Qtr 2) 3.90526 7.40111   Assessment of Spatial Exposure to RF Radiation due to GSM 900 and GSM1800 – A Case Study of  www.iosrjournals.org                                                        46 | Page  Figure 1: Map of the University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan showing measurement locations   Spectral measurements were taken for GSM 900 and GSM 1800 bands. ‘Start’ and ‘Stop’ frequencies on the spectrum analyzer were set for each RF band measurement in accordance with the Nigerian Communications Commission’s Downlink Frequency Spectrum allocation. For GMS 900, the spectrum analyzer was allowed to sweep between start frequency of 935MHz and stop frequency 960MHz. For GMS 1800, the spectrum analyzer swept between the start frequency 1805MHz and stop frequency 1880MHz. A sweep sample time of 50mS was chosen on the spectrum analyzer so as to get a better spectral resolution of the displayed signal. However, there is a trade-off between how quickly the display can update the full frequency span under consideration and the frequency resolution.   III. Results And Discussion   A summarized result of all measurements for GSM 900 and GSM 1800 in locations 1 to 30 is shown in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively. The results show that the exposure due to GSM 900 varied from 0.85µW/m2 to 212.40µW/m2; while the exposure due to GSM 1800 varied from 0.32µW/m2 to 67.40µW/m2. The mean power density of 38.37µW/m2 and 8.68µW/m2 was obtained for GSM 900 and GSM 1800 respectively. Fig. 2 presents the variation between GSM 900 and GSM 1800 which shows that exposure due to GSM 900 is generally greater than exposure due to GSM 1800 in the study area. This may be due to a higher level of radiating power from GSM 900 radio than that of GSM 1800. It may also be due to the angle of tilt of the GSM 900 antenna. The exposure due to GSM 900 and GSM 1800 almost vary in the same manner in all the locations except for exposure obtained in Location 29 for GSM 900 which is significantly high. This may be linked to environmental reflection from huge metallic storage tanks in the location. Objects, especially those with metallic surfaces provide excellent reflectors of radiofrequency energy. There are also many other metallic structures in the study area that give excellent reflecting surfaces.  Table 2: Summarized result obtained for GSM 900 POWER DENSITY DUE TO GSM 900 Location Power Density S (µW/m2) S -  µ (µW/m2) (S – µ)2  L1 108.90 70.53 4974.48 L2 3.35 -35.02 1226.40 L3  42.77 4.40 19.36 L4 2.67 -35.70 1274.49 L5 9.21 -29.16 850.31 L6 7.15 -31.22 974.69 L7 2.01 -36.36 1322.05 L8 1.95 -36.42 1326.42 L9 1.04 -37.33 1393.53 L10 0.85 -37.52 1407.75 L11 3.50 -34.87 1215.92 L12 3.44 -34.93 1220.10 L13 6.12 -32.25 1040.06 L14 12.93 -25.44 647.19 L15 11.01 -27.36 748.57 L16 137.00 98.63 9727.88 L17 67.70 29.33 860.25 Assessment of Spatial Exposure to RF Radiation due to GSM 900 and GSM1800 – A Case Study of  www.iosrjournals.org                                                        47 | Page L18 28.51 -9.86 97.22 L19 33.92 -4.45 19.80 L20 2.19 -36.18 1308.99 L21 4.07 -34.30 1176.49 L22 91.37 53.00 2809.00 L23 127.60 89.23 7961.99 L24 11.80 -26.57 705.96 L25 98.99 60.62 3674.78 L26 20.50 -17.87 319.34 L27 18.67 -19.70 388.09 L28 39.67 1.30 1.69 L29 212.40 174.03 30286.44 L30 39.67 1.30 1.69                            Σ(S – µ)2 = 78,980.94µW/m2  The mean power density obtained for GSM 900 (µ900) = 38.37(µW/m2)  Table 3: Summarized result obtained for GSM 1800 POWER DENSITY DUE TO GSM 1800 Location Power Density S (µW/m2) S -  µ (µW/m2) (S – µ)2  L1 2.25 -6.43 41.34 L2 1.19 -7.49 56.10 L3  24.20 15.52 240.87 L4 6.57 -2.11 4.45 L5 34.71 26.03 677.56 L6 1.79 -6.89 47.47 L7 0.41 -8.27 68.39 L8 0.37 -8.31 69.06 L9 0.37 -8.31 69.06 L10 2.07 -6.61 43.69 L11 0.60 -8.08 65.29 L12 0.51 -8.17 66.75 L13 1.63 -7.05 49.70 L14 1.15 -7.53 56.70 L15 67.40 58.72 3448.04 L16 43.30 34.62 1198.54 L17 2.34 -6.34 40.20 L18 3.40 -5.28 27.88 L19 2.16 -6.52 42.51 L20 0.40 -8.28 68.56 L21 0.32 -8.36 69.89 L22 1.70 -6.98 48.72 L23 12.99 4.31 18.58 L24 1.18 -7.50 56.25 L25 7.48 -1.20 1.44 L26 1.16 -7.52 56.55 L27 7.29 -1.39 1.93 L28 12.30 3.62 13.10 L29 6.98 -1.70 2.89 L30 12.30 3.62 13.10                            Σ(S – µ)2 = 6664.62µW/m2  The mean power density obtained for GSM 1800 (µ1800) = 8.68(µW/m2)   The Standard Deviations for the exposure due to GSM 900 (S.D900) and GSM 1800 (S.D1800) are obtained as follows:   S.D900= 1n (S- µ900)2nk=1    (2)   S.D1800= 1n (S- µ1800)2nk=1    (3)  where n is 30, which is the number of measurements.  Therefore, the Standard deviation obtained for exposure due to GSM 900 is 51.31µW/m2. Similarly, the Standard Deviation obtained for exposure due to GSM 1800 is 14.90µW/m2. The compliance of GSM 900 and GSM 1800 are shown in Table 4.   Assessment of Spatial Exposure to RF Radiation due to GSM 900 and GSM1800 – A Case Study of  www.iosrjournals.org                                                        48 | Page Table 4 Comparison of Results obtained for GSM900 and GSM1800 with ICNIRP Reference Level  Max Power density (µW/m2) ICNIRP Reference Level (µW/m2) % of max power density to ICNIRP Reference Level (Compliance Level) GSM 900 212.40 4.5 x 106 0.0047% GSM 1800 67.40 9.0 x 106 0.00075%                           Figure 2: Variations in the exposure due to GSM 900 and GSM 1800 in the study area  IV. Conclusion  The results of this study show that exposure to radiofrequency field from GSM 900 and GSM 1800 in the University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan, Nigeria is below the ICNIRP reference level. No location reached or exceeded the reference levels. The compliance level of 0.0047% and 0.00075% were obtained for GSM 900 and GSM 1800 respectively. As electromagnetic waves, and in this case, radiofrequency signals travel, they interact with objects and the media in which they travel. As they do this the radio signals can be reflected, refracted or diffracted. These interactions cause the radio signals to change direction, and to reach areas which would not be possible if the radio signals travelled in a direct line. The interactions contribute to the radiofrequency exposure in any environment.  References Journal Papers: [1] P.A.Valberg, T. E. Deventer, and M.H. Repacholi, Workgroup Report: Base Stations and Wireless Networks - Radiofrequency (RF) Exposures and Health Consequences. Environ Health Perspect. 115(3) (2007), 416–424. [3] B.O. Ayinmode, N.N. Jibiri, and I.P. Farai, Occupational exposure due to RF leakages within GSM Base Station Cabins in Eastern Nigeria. Afr. J. Biomed. Res. Vol. 15 (2012), 135-137. [5] D.A. Shalangwa, P.G. Vasira, and D.H, Shalangwa, Review of Measurement of Exposure of Radio Frequency Field (RF) Radiation from Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) Masts. Pacific Journal of Science and Technology. 12(1) (2011), 621-627. [6] A. Tomruk, G. Guler, A.S. Dincel, The Influence of 1800 MHz GSM-like Signals on Hepatic Oxidative DNA and Lipid Damage in Nonpregnant, Pregnant and Newly born Rabbits. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics Journal, 56(1) (2009), 39-47. [9] ICNIRP, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300GHz). Health Physics 74(4) (1998), 494-522. Books: [4] H. Cember and T. Johnson, Introduction to Health Physics (McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-142308-3, 4th Ed 2009). [7] H. Cember and T. Johnson, Introduction to Health Physics (McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-142308-3, 4th Ed 2009). Websites: [2] T. Haumann, U. Munzenberg, W. Maes, and P. Sierck, (2003). HF – Radiation Levels of GSM Cellular Phone Towers in Residential Areas. Retrieved from http://hbelc.org/pdf/memdocs/cellularphoneradiation.pdf [8] G.J. Hyland, (2003). How exposure to GSM and TETRA can adversely affect humans. Retrieved from http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20030701_hyland_basestations.pdf   0.0050.00100.00150.00200.00250.00L1 L3 L5 L7 L9L11L13L15L17L19L21L23L25L27L29GSM900 Exposure (µW/m2)Locations Power density (S) 

Assessment of Spatial Exposure to RF Radiation due to GSM 900 

and GSM1800 – A Case Study of UCH, Ibadan, Nigeria

http://eprints.abuad.edu.ng/134/1/G0424448.pdf

Assessment of Spatial Exposure to RF Radiation due to GSM 900 and GSM1800 – A Case Study of UCH, Ibadan, Nigeria

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Afe Babalola University Repository