Andersen, Per Dannemand

Hansen, Meiken

Online Research Database In Technology

  General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.   Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal  If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.         Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Mar 30, 2019Sustainability and the Danish energy and transport sector: Investigating controversiesin a scenario planning processHansen, Meiken; Andersen, Per DannemandPublication date:2017Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordLink back to DTU OrbitCitation (APA):Hansen, M., & Andersen, P. D. (2017). Sustainability and the Danish energy and transport sector: Investigatingcontroversies in a scenario planning process. Abstract from 4S/EASST 2017 Boston, Boston, United States.Abstract for the 4S session: RE-ASSEMBLING URBAN LIFE: STS AND THE MAKING OF SUSTAINABILITY Title: Sustainability and the Danish energy and transport sector: Investigating controversies in a scenario planning process Authors: Meiken Hansen, Per Dannemand Andersen Public controversies provide opportunities for engaging stakeholders in research in new ways  (Landstro, Ward, and Bradley 2011). Participatory processes involving stakeholders and citizen are crucial to secure impact on actual policy making. This may be the reason why public engagement in science and technology has been studied for several decades (Stilgoe et al. 2014, Selin et al. 2016).  This paper investigates controversies (Callon 1986; Callon et al. 2009) which appear during the participatory and public events in the COMETS project. The project combines models (an energy system model and a behavior based national transport model) with stakeholder participation, ultimately to involve the Danish parliament’s Standing Committee for Energy, Utilities and Climate in evaluating the scenarios. The research questions are: how do different actors contribute to scenarios through various stakeholder involvement methods; and, how are the dominant controversies in the process discussed among the different actors? The data for this paper originates from workshops, interviews, and public involvement events during which a set of narrative scenarios was: first, created; second, translated into model-parameters; and third, evaluated by stakeholders and citizen.  This study contributes with knowledge of stakeholder and public-involvement in a transdisciplinary project. Preliminary results show that occurring controversies in the field become apparent through the process of creating narrative scenarios. In the process of co-producing narratives the different actor groups, including policy makers, contribute to a broadening of the knowledge base among the scientists and modellers. Furthermore the process did increases the perspectives on both local knowledge and place-based expertise.   

Sustainability and the Danish energy and transport sector: Investigating controversies in a scenario planning process

http://orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/164802359/Hansen_Andersen_abstract_4S.pdf

Sustainability and the Danish energy and transport sector: Investigating controversies in a scenario planning process

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Online Research Database In Technology