Andreasi Bassi, Susanna

Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard

Boldrin, Alessio

IntroductionThe Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) “is a policy approach under which producers are given a significant responsibility – financial and/or physical – for the treatment or disposal of post-consumer products” (OECD, 2018). For packaging, the importers/producers pay a certain environmental contribution in order to reach a certain recycling target independently from the market demand. Due to the importance of EPR, the European Commission is working on harmonising its application and the way the contributions are calculated (European Commission, 2018). This work focuses on plastic packaging due to the recent importance of this waste fraction.The specific objectives of this work are: to demonstrate that the reported quantity of recycled plastic are not actually recycled; to quantify which costs are covered by the environmental contribution and to propose an “extension” of the EPR for plastic packaging. This work will contribute to the discussion on how to implement effectively EPR in Europe. Material and MethodsThe EPR strategies for plastic packaging waste in Europe are analysed with the use of the Material Flow Analysis (MFA), system and market analyses with a special focus on export of waste. Lastly, we worked on modelling how the environmental contribution could be quantified in order to reach the recycling targets. Results and ConclusionsThe data on material officially recycled in European countries usually report only the quantity of material that is sold in the market as waste bales after sorting and not the material that will actually become a new product that is not tracked.  Furthermore, the environmental contributions generally do not account for the design of the products a part for rare shy attempts to do so (e.g. France and Italy) even if the design can highly impact the market price of the waste bales (e.g. PET clear versus PET mixed) and of the applications of the secondary polymers. The conclusion of this study is that the current EPR is not leading to the wanted recycling targets. The environmental contributions paid by companies should be modelled based on the real recycling path and on the design of the packaging. Finally, EU should work on a better understanding of the fate of the plastic collected. <br/

Online Research Database In Technology

  General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.   Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal  If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.         Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Mar 30, 2019How to extend the Extended Producer Responsibility along the value chain of plasticpackaging wasteAndreasi Bassi, Susanna; Boldrin, Alessio; Astrup, Thomas FruergaardPublication date:2018Document VersionVersion created as part of publication process; publisher's layout; not normally made publicly availableLink back to DTU OrbitCitation (APA):Andreasi Bassi, S., Boldrin, A., & Astrup, T. F. (2018). How to extend the Extended Producer Responsibilityalong the value chain of plastic packaging waste. Abstract from 2nd Conference on Life Cycle Assessment ofWaste, Snekkersten, Denmark.2nd Conference on Life Cycle Assessment of waste - Integrated Residual Resource Management and Assessment, June 18th-22nd 2018 1 How to extend the Extended Producer Responsibility along the value chain of plastic packaging waste Susanna Andreasi Bassi (suan@env.dtu.dk), Alessio Boldrin (aleb@env.dtu.dk), Thomas Astrup Keywords: Waste plastic packaging; EPR; Economic incentives; Recycling targets  Introduction The Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) “is a policy approach under which producers are given a significant responsibility – financial and/or physical – for the treatment or disposal of post-consumer products” (OECD, 2018). For packaging, the importers/producers pay a certain environmental contribution in order to reach a certain recycling target independently from the market demand. Due to the importance of EPR, the European Commission is working on harmonising its application and the way the contributions are calculated (European Commission, 2018). This work focuses on plastic packaging due to the recent importance of this waste fraction. The specific objectives of this work are: to demonstrate that the reported quantity of recycled plastic are not actually recycled; to quantify which costs are covered by the environmental contribution and to propose an “extension” of the EPR for plastic packaging. This work will contribute to the discussion on how to implement effectively EPR in Europe.  Material and Methods The EPR strategies for plastic packaging waste in Europe are analysed with the use of the Material Flow Analysis (MFA), system and market analyses with a special focus on export of waste. Lastly, we worked on modelling how the environmental contribution could be quantified in order to reach the recycling targets.  Results and Conclusions The data on material officially recycled in European countries usually report only the quantity of material that is sold in the market as waste bales after sorting and not the material that will actually become a new product that is not tracked.   Furthermore, the environmental contributions generally do not account for the design of the products a part for rare shy attempts to do so (e.g. France and Italy) even if the design can highly impact the market price of the waste bales (e.g. PET clear versus PET mixed) and of the applications of the secondary polymers.  The conclusion of this study is that the current EPR is not leading to the wanted recycling targets. The environmental contributions paid by companies should be modelled based on the real recycling path and on the design of the packaging. Finally, EU should work on a better understanding of the fate of the plastic collected.  References European Commission, 2018. A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy. Brussels. OECD, 2018. Extended producer responsibility [WWW Document]. URL http://www.oecd.org/env/tools-evaluation/extendedproducerresponsibility.htm (accessed 4.29.18). 

How to extend the Extended Producer Responsibility along the value chain of plastic packaging waste

http://orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/163088692/Bassi_Abstract_Waste_LCA.pdf

How to extend the Extended Producer Responsibility along the value chain of plastic packaging waste

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Online Research Database In Technology