Figueras, J

McKee, M

Nolte, E

English

LSHTM Research Online

A Guide to NHS Foundation Trusts,

A ladder of citizen participation in the USA’,

A sociological perspective on public participation in health care’,

Challenges of citizen participation in regional health authorities’,

Citizen participation in health decision-making: past experience and future prospects’,

Citizens and rationing: analysis of a European survey’,

Community Organizing,

Devolving authority for health care in Canada’s provinces: an introduction to the issues’,

Guest editorial: public and user ‘‘involvement’’

Interpreting public input into priority-setting: the role of mediating institutions’,

Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework’,

Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens,

On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research’,

Partnerships, power and the ‘‘new’’ politics of community participation in British health care’,

Patient and Public Involvement in Health: The Evidence for Policy Implementation,

Patient choice and patient empowerment in Northern European health systems: a conceptual framework’,

Patient engagement and patient decision-making in England’, Presented at the Commonwealth Fund/Nufﬁeld Trust Conference ‘Improving Quality of Health Care in the United States and the United Kingdom: Strategies for Change and Action’,

Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London’,

Political Participation and Democracy in Britain, Cambridge:

Prioritising health service in an era of limits: the Oregon experience’,

Public involvement in health care’,

Public involvement policies in health 159Arrow,

Public involvement policies in health 161Parker,

Public involvement policies in practice: a comparison of 5 European countries’,

Public Involvement: Framework and Guidelines, Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services.

Public opinion on systems for feeding back views to the National Health Service’, Quality and Safety in Health Care,

Public Participation in Health, London: King Edward’s Hospital Fund.

Public participation in priority setting: commitment or illusion?’, in

Public participation in the new NHS: no closer to citizen control?’,

Rationing care in the community: engaging citizens in health care decision making’,

Reluctant rationers: public input into health care priorities’’

Representing consumer interests: imbalanced markets, health planning and HSAs’,

Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens’ juries?’,

Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care’,

The Autonomous Patient – Ending Paternalism in Medical Care,

The Development of structures for citizen and patient participation in the decision-making process affecting health care’, Recommendation

the Effective Public Consultation Project Team (2004), ‘Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens’ perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decisionmaking’,

The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century,

The politics of participation’,

The public is too subjective: public involvement at different levels of healthcare decision making’,

Which champions, which people? Public and user involvement in health care as a technology of legitimation‘,

Whose health service is it anyway? Community values in healthcare’,

Whose interests do lay people represent? Towards an understanding of the role of lay people as members of committees’,

Widening the debate? Consultation and participation in local health care planning in the English and Swedish health services’,

World Health Organisation

Strategies for health services

http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/12526/1/HP11pdf.pdf

Strategies for health services

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

LSHTM Research Online