Tolerant judgments of Muslims’ political rights and dissenting beliefs and practices by ethnic Dutch
adolescents (12–18 years) were examined. Participants (N = 632) made judgments of different types
of behaviors and different contexts in an experimental questionnaire study. As in other studies, tolerance
was found to not be a global construct. Adolescents took into account various aspects of what
they were asked to tolerate and the sense in which they should be tolerant. The type of actor, the
nature of the social implication of the behavior, the underlying belief type, and the dimension of
tolerance, all made a difference to the tolerant judgments. Additionally, the findings strongly suggest
that tolerance judgments do not develop through an age-related stage-like sequence where an intolerant
attitude is followed by tolerance. For females, there were no age differences, and older males
were less tolerant than younger males. There were also gender differences with males being less
tolerant for some types of behavior and females being less tolerant for behaviors that negatively
affected Muslim females. Level of education had a positive effect on tolerance. The findings are
discussed with reference to social-cognitive domain theory.