For the past 4 years, the University of Nebraska strawberry team has worked to develop low cost, sustainable methods for farmers and growers to produce strawberries in a double polyethylene greenhouse during the winter. This past year, this growing system was adapted to become a commercial grower’s heated high tunnel for the winter/spring of 2013-14. The idea was to scale up to a farm-size demonstration and compare it to the university greenhouse production system with a goal to expand marketing opportunities for strawberries into the winter season

Adams, Stacy A.

Blankenship, Erin E.

Conley, M. Elizabeth

Lambe, David P.

Meyer, George E.

Paparozzi, Ellen T.

Pekarek, Ryan

Read, Paul

English

DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska

University of Nebraska - LincolnDigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - LincolnAgronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department2014Comparison of Winter Strawberry Production in aCommercial Heated High Tunnel versus aUniversity GreenhouseEllen T. PaparozziUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, etp1@unl.eduRyan PekarekUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnGeorge E. MeyerUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, gmeyer1@unl.eduStacy A. AdamsUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, sadams1@unl.eduM. Elizabeth ConleyUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnSee next page for additional authorsFollow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpubPart of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and CropSciences Commons, Botany Commons, Horticulture Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons,and the Plant Biology CommonsThis Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska -Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator ofDigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln.Paparozzi, Ellen T.; Pekarek, Ryan; Meyer, George E.; Adams, Stacy A.; Conley, M. Elizabeth; Lambe, David P.; Read, Paul; andBlankenship, Erin E., "Comparison of Winter Strawberry Production in a Commercial Heated High Tunnel versus a UniversityGreenhouse" (2014). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 749.https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/749AuthorsEllen T. Paparozzi, Ryan Pekarek, George E. Meyer, Stacy A. Adams, M. Elizabeth Conley, David P. Lambe,Paul Read, and Erin E. BlankenshipThis article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/749 Comparison of  Winter Strawberry Production in a Commercial    Heated High Tunnel versus a University Greenhouse                     Ellen T. Paparozzi, Ryan Pekarek, George E. Meyer, Stacy A. Adams,                 M. Elizabeth Conley, David Lambe, Paul Read*, and Erin E. Blankenship                         Departments of Agronomy & Horticulture, Biological Systems Engineering, and Statistics                            University of Nebraska-Lincoln,  Lincoln, Nebraska 68583 Materials and Methods A heated high tunnel 25’ by 75’ was constructed and equipped with an overhead furnace, three low cost benches and a sustainable capillary mat system (Figure 1). Holes were cut in the plastic to allow the pots to sit directly on the mat while minimizing algae growth (Figure 2). The double polyethylene greenhouse at UNL was about the same size with similar features except the heat was funneled through poly tubes underneath the benches and only 1/3 of the two benches were used.  The experimental design for the university study was a RCBD with 5 cultivars (Seascape, Seascape+, Evie-2, Evie-2+, and San Andreas) and twelve replications across two benches. Data included: number and pounds of berries per cultivar per week, total water and natural gas usage, monitoring  and recording of growing conditions to include incident light level, soil moisture capacity, light reflectance from leaves and relative humidity of the greenhouse. The experimental design for the grower production experiment was also a RCBD with 3 benches (replications) and the same 5 cultivars (treatments). Data included all of the above as well as associated building, growing and marketing costs including sale price. .  Figure 1. Double polyethylene heated high tunnel with acrylic end walls. Figure 2. Capillary mat system with white/black polyethylene cover. Figure 3. CapMat II with reflective mulch and buried sensors at the heated high tunnel location. Water and Gas Usage Water usage was 7,650 gallons at the heated high tunnel and 3,800 gallons at the greenhouse. This translates to approximately 15.8 gallons per plant over the entire growing season (in the greenhouse) and 7.26 gallons per plant total for the plants in the heated high tunnel. The water usage by the plants in the heated high tunnel was at least 45% less than projected.  The natural gas usage for the growing season at the greenhouse with under bench heating was 329,000 cu ft. ($2,038.85). The propane usage with the overhead furnace was 4,385 gallons ($7,487.55). Both costs were substantially higher than projected from previous research. Light, Soil Moisture, and Temperature The heated high tunnel had increased light transmittance due to the new special double poly cover. This higher transmittance did translate to similar or higher berry production for the Fall/Winter when the plants were small. However once the plants grew larger, the greenhouse plants out produced the cooperator house plants.  The mix temperature of all the pots at the university greenhouse was consistently at 20 ?C.  For pots in the heated high tunnel, mix temperatures varied from 13-20 ?C depending on location in the house.  Fluctuations in the water/fertilizer levels (as measured by the volumetric water content and EC) as well as the air temperature followed a similar pattern probably due to the different heating system in the commercial house. For more details see:  Meyer, G.E. et al., 2014. Evaluation of soilless media sensors for managing winter-time greenhouse strawberry production using a CapMat system. Proceedings ASABE-CSBE/SCGAB Annual International Meeting. Graph 3. Total mass of berries (pounds) produced at the heated high tunnel during October through December 31. !"#!"$!"%!"&!"'!"(!"!"#$%&'())*&+$,,&-%./&0$)1(,#&2((3&)*+,-$")*+,-$"."/01"2134,05"/,05607,"/,05607,"."Graph 4. Total mass of berries (pounds) produced at the heated high tunnel during January through April 12. !"$"&"("8"#!"#$"#&"#("#8"!"#$%&'())*&+$,,&-%./&0$)1(,#&2((3&)*+,-$")*+,-$"."/01"2134,05"/,05607,"/,05607,"."Graph 1. Total mass of berries (pounds) produced at the university greenhouse during October through December 31.  !"$"&"("8"#!"#$"#&"#("#8"!"#$%&'())*&+$,,&-%./&0$)1(,#&2((3&)*+,-$")*+,-$"."/01"2134,05"/,05607,"/,05607,"."Graph 2. Total mass of berries (pounds) produced at the university greenhouse during January through April 12. Table 1. Mass of berries (pounds) produced by plants in the heated high tunnel.  ‘Evie-2’ and ‘Evie-2+’ produced at least 1 pound of berries per plant. Introduction For the past 4 years, the University of Nebraska strawberry team has worked to develop low cost, sustainable methods for farmers and growers to produce strawberries in a double polyethylene greenhouse during the winter.  This past year, this growing system was adapted to become a commercial grower’s heated high tunnel for the winter/spring of 2013-14. The idea was to scale up to a farm-size demonstration and compare it to the university greenhouse production system with a goal to expand marketing opportunities for strawberries into the winter season.  Results As expected, total berry mass peaked during March and both sites showed this same general pattern.  In the Fall/Winter, plants grown in the heated high tunnel showed two production peaks in November.  Plants grown in the double poly greenhouse showed two production peaks also but around Thanksgiving and Christmas.  We thought that the closer we came to holiday production the higher the price and thus, the push towards more berry production in December.  This did not turn out to be true as our commercial partner got the same price for the whole growing period (somewhere between $2.50 - $2.75 per pint). !"$"&"("8"#!"#$"#&"#("#8"!"#$%&'())*&+$,,&-%./&0$)1(,#&2((3&)*+,-$")*+,-$"."/01"2134,05"/,05607,"/,05607,"."!"#$%&'()*'(+,$-'()*'.#+-/0,*!"#$%&'()%#*+, !"#$%&'! !"#$%&'(! !)*+,-+./%*0! !)%*01*2%! !)%*01*2%(!31456%/,&,7%1%86%/,9: ;<';= ;<'>; ;<;>' ;<;?= ;<:@>A*+B*/C,&,-2/$D,:' ;<>=@ ;<E?E ;<F@F ;<E?9 ;<EE9GB86%/,5H,D$#%,2D*+40 '=; 'F; :;F ''= ':E:I;9@,2D*+40,5H,:I;F=

Comparison of Winter Strawberry Production in a Commercial
Heated High Tunnel versus a University Greenhouse

UNL | Libraries

University of Nebraska - Lincoln
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department
2014
Comparison of Winter Strawberry Production in a
Commercial Heated High Tunnel versus a
University Greenhouse
Ellen T. Paparozzi
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, etp1@unl.edu
Ryan Pekarek
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
George E. Meyer
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, gmeyer1@unl.edu
Stacy A. Adams
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, sadams1@unl.edu
M. Elizabeth Conley
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
See next page for additional authors
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub
Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop
Sciences Commons, Botany Commons, Horticulture Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons,
and the Plant Biology Commons
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska -
Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
Paparozzi, Ellen T.; Pekarek, Ryan; Meyer, George E.; Adams, Stacy A.; Conley, M. Elizabeth; Lambe, David P.; Read, Paul; and
Blankenship, Erin E., "Comparison of Winter Strawberry Production in a Commercial Heated High Tunnel versus a University
Greenhouse" (2014). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 749.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/749
Authors
Ellen T. Paparozzi, Ryan Pekarek, George E. Meyer, Stacy A. Adams, M. Elizabeth Conley, David P. Lambe,
Paul Read, and Erin E. Blankenship
This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/
749
 Comparison of  Winter Strawberry Production in a Commercial    
Heated High Tunnel versus a University Greenhouse 
                    Ellen T. Paparozzi, Ryan Pekarek, George E. Meyer, Stacy A. Adams, 
                M. Elizabeth Conley, David Lambe, Paul Read*, and Erin E. Blankenship 
                        Departments of Agronomy & Horticulture, Biological Systems Engineering, and Statistics 
                           University of Nebraska-Lincoln,  Lincoln, Nebraska 68583 
Materials and Methods 
A heated high tunnel 25’ by 75’ was constructed and equipped with an overhead furnace, 
three low cost benches and a sustainable capillary mat system (Figure 1). Holes were cut in 
the plastic to allow the pots to sit directly on the mat while minimizing algae growth (Figure 2). 
The double polyethylene greenhouse at UNL was about the same size with similar features 
except the heat was funneled through poly tubes underneath the benches and only 1/3 of the 
two benches were used.  The experimental design for the university study was a RCBD with 5 
cultivars (Seascape, Seascape+, Evie-2, Evie-2+, and San Andreas) and twelve replications 
across two benches. Data included: number and pounds of berries per cultivar per week, total 
water and natural gas usage, monitoring  and recording of growing conditions to include 
incident light level, soil moisture capacity, light reflectance from leaves and relative humidity of 
the greenhouse. The experimental design for the grower production experiment was also a 
RCBD with 3 benches (replications) and the same 5 cultivars (treatments). Data included all 
of the above as well as associated building, growing and marketing costs including sale price. 
. 
 
Figure 1. Double polyethylene heated high tunnel with acrylic end walls. 
Figure 2. Capillary mat system with white/black polyethylene cover. 
Figure 3. CapMat II with reflective mulch and buried sensors at the heated high tunnel 
location. 
Water and Gas Usage 
Water usage was 7,650 gallons at the heated high tunnel and 3,800 gallons at the 
greenhouse. This translates to approximately 15.8 gallons per plant over the entire 
growing season (in the greenhouse) and 7.26 gallons per plant total for the plants in 
the heated high tunnel. The water usage by the plants in the heated high tunnel was 
at least 45% less than projected. 
 
The natural gas usage for the growing season at the greenhouse with under bench 
heating was 329,000 cu ft. ($2,038.85). The propane usage with the overhead furnace 
was 4,385 gallons ($7,487.55). Both costs were substantially higher than projected 
from previous research. 
Light, Soil Moisture, and Temperature 
The heated high tunnel had increased light transmittance due to the new special double 
poly cover. This higher transmittance did translate to similar or higher berry production 
for the Fall/Winter when the plants were small. However once the plants grew larger, the 
greenhouse plants out produced the cooperator house plants. 
 
The mix temperature of all the pots at the university greenhouse was consistently at 20 
?C.  For pots in the heated high tunnel, mix temperatures varied from 13-20 ?C 
depending on location in the house. 
 
Fluctuations in the water/fertilizer levels (as measured by the volumetric water content 
and EC) as well as the air temperature followed a similar pattern probably due to the 
different heating system in the commercial house. For more details see:  Meyer, G.E. et 
al., 2014. Evaluation of soilless media sensors for managing winter-time greenhouse 
strawberry production using a CapMat system. Proceedings ASABE-CSBE/SCGAB 
Annual International Meeting. 
Graph 3. Total mass of berries (pounds) produced at the 
heated high tunnel during October through December 31. 
!"
#!"
$!"
%!"
&!"
'!"
(!"
!"
#$
%&'
()
)*
&+
$,
,&
-%
./
&
0$)1(,#&2((3&
)*+,-$"
)*+,-$"."
/01"2134,05"
/,05607,"
/,05607,"."
Graph 4. Total mass of berries (pounds) produced at the 
heated high tunnel during January through April 12. 
!"
$"
&"
("
8"
#!"
#$"
#&"
#("
#8"
!"
#$
%&'
()
)*
&+
$,
,&
-%
./
&
0$)1(,#&2((3&
)*+,-$"
)*+,-$"."
/01"2134,05"
/,05607,"
/,05607,"."
Graph 1. Total mass of berries (pounds) produced at the 
university greenhouse during October through December 31.  
!"
$"
&"
("
8"
#!"
#$"
#&"
#("
#8"
!"
#$
%&'
()
)*
&+
$,
,&
-%
./
&
0$)1(,#&2((3&
)*+,-$"
)*+,-$"."
/01"2134,05"
/,05607,"
/,05607,"."
Graph 2. Total mass of berries (pounds) produced at the 
university greenhouse during January through April 12. 
Table 1. Mass of berries (pounds) produced by plants in the heated high tunnel. 
 ‘Evie-2’ and ‘Evie-2+’ produced at least 1 pound of berries per plant. 
Introduction 
For the past 4 years, the University of Nebraska strawberry team has worked to develop 
low cost, sustainable methods for farmers and growers to produce strawberries in a 
double polyethylene greenhouse during the winter.  This past year, this growing system 
was adapted to become a commercial grower’s heated high tunnel for the winter/spring 
of 2013-14. The idea was to scale up to a farm-size demonstration and compare it to the 
university greenhouse production system with a goal to expand marketing opportunities 
for strawberries into the winter season.  
Results 
As expected, total berry mass peaked during March and both sites showed this same general 
pattern.  In the Fall/Winter, plants grown in the heated high tunnel showed two production peaks in 
November.  Plants grown in the double poly greenhouse showed two production peaks also but 
around Thanksgiving and Christmas.  We thought that the closer we came to holiday production the 
higher the price and thus, the push towards more berry production in December.  This did not turn 
out to be true as our commercial partner got the same price for the whole growing period 
(somewhere between $2.50 - $2.75 per pint). 
!"
$"
&"
("
8"
#!"
#$"
#&"
#("
#8"
!"
#$
%&'
()
)*
&+
$,
,&
-%
./
&
0$)1(,#&2((3&
)*+,-$"
)*+,-$"."
/01"2134,05"
/,05607,"
/,05607,"."
!"#$%&'()*'(+,$-'()*'.#+-/0,*
!"#$%&'()%#*+, !"#$%&'! !"#$%&'(! !)*+,-+./%*0! !)%*01*2%! !)%*01*2%(!
31456%/,&,7%1%86%/,9: ;<';= ;<'>; ;<;>' ;<;?= ;<:@>
A*+B*/C,&,-2/$D,:' ;<>=@ ;<E?E ;<F@F ;<E?9 ;<EE9
GB86%/,5H,D$#%,2D*+40 '=; 'F; :;F ''= ':E
:I;9@,2D*+40,5H,:I;F=


https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1753&amp;context=agronomyfacpub

Comparison of Winter Strawberry Production in a Commercial Heated High Tunnel versus a University Greenhouse

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska

UNL | Libraries