The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is conducting priority cleanups of abandoned mine sites on public lands. Typically, these sites contain tailings piles, cyanide heaps, and rock dumps that historically were constructed in or near drainages and now are releasing pollutants into watersheds. In compliance with regulations, BLM selects the most environmentally suitable site for removing mining waste and placing it into repositories. Repositories have different design features, and the design selected should be based on site-specific conditions and the results of water balance models. A Geographic Information System (GIS) can be a useful tool for screening and selecting a repository site. Industry sources and construction data from existing repositories can be used to predict construction costs. BLM found that the key factor in predicting cost is the volume of wastes to be placed

Ford, K. L.

Walker, M.

English

DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Bureau of Land Management Papers U.S. Department of the Interior 2003 Abandoned Mine Waste Repositories: Site Selction, Design, and Cost K. L. Ford National Science and Technology Center M. Walker U.S. Forest Service Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usblmpub  Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Ford, K. L. and Walker, M., "Abandoned Mine Waste Repositories: Site Selction, Design, and Cost" (2003). U.S. Bureau of Land Management Papers. 1. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usblmpub/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of the Interior at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. Bureau of Land Management Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. U.S. Department of the Interior • Bureau of Land ManagementTechnical Note 410April 2003Production services provided by:Information and Communications StaffPublishing Staff (303-236-6547)Janine Koselak: Layout and DesignLinda Hill: EditingLee Barkow, DirectorNational Science & Technology CenterP.O. Box 25047Denver, Colorado 80225-0047The Bureau of Land Management’s National Scienceand Technology Center supports other BLM offices byproviding a broad spectrum of services in areas such asphysical, biological, and social science assessments; architecture and engineering support; library assistance;mapping science; photo imaging; geographic informationsystems applications; and publications support. Available at:www.blm.gov/nstc/library/techno2.htmTechnical Note 410BLM/ST/ST-02/002+3596Technical Note 410April 2003by:K.L. FordBureau of Land ManagementNational Science and Technology CenterM. WalkerU.S. Forest ServiceRocky Mountain RegionABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COSTSUGGESTED CITATION:Ford, K.L. and M. Walker. 2002. Abandoned mine waste repositories: siteselection, design, and cost. Technical Note 410. BLM/ST/ST-02/002+3596.Bureau of Land Management Web-based report available online athttp://www.blm.gov/nstc/library/techno2.htm.iiiABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COSTContentsAbstract  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1Keywords  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Site Selection  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Design  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4Cost of Mine Waste Repositories  . . . . . . . . . . . . .5Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .81ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COSTAbstractTHE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (BLM) is conducting prioritycleanups of abandoned mine sites on public lands. Typically, these sites containtailings piles, cyanide heaps, and rock dumps that historically were constructedin or near drainages and now are releasing pollutants into watersheds. Incompliance with regulations, BLM selects the most environmentally suitablesite for removing mining waste and placing it into repositories. Repositorieshave different design features, and the design selected should be based onsite-specific conditions and the results of water balance models. A GeographicInformation System (GIS) can be a useful tool for screening and selecting arepository site. Industry sources and construction data from existing repositoriescan be used to predict construction costs. BLM found that the key factor inpredicting cost is the volume of wastes to be placed.KeywordsAbandoned minesHazardous wasteMine wasteRepositorySurface water contaminationTailings3ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COSTIntroductionTHERE ARE A LARGE NUMBER of abandoned hard rock mining sites onthe 261 million acres of public lands administered by the Bureau of LandManagement (BLM) in the 12 Western States. While the actual number is notknown, there are currently over 9,000 such sites in BLM’s inventory. TheNational Science and Technology Center (NSTC) is BLM’s technical supportcenter for investigation and cleanup of abandoned mines and hazardous wastesites. Within the constraints of available funding, NSTC has investigatedhundreds of abandoned mine sites and has assisted in the cleanup of 15–20of the worst sites identified.Typically, these sites involve old milling operations where ores were crushedand milled using mercury amalgamation, flotation, or cyanide leaching. Thus,there are often tailings or heap material remaining at the site. These wastes,which contain high concentrations of metals, cyanide, and often acidity, wereusually placed in drainages with tailing dams. When the dams were no longermaintained, they often breached and became an ongoing source of contamina-tion to surface waters. The mining wastes are typically handled as Superfundwastes under the National Contingency Plan (40 CFR 300.415). One methodfor handling historic tailings is to use mine waste repositories. This TechnicalNote provides information on site selection, repository design, and the cost ofconstructing a repository on BLM public lands.Site SelectionBLM IS REQUIRED TO LOCATE REPOSITORIES in the most environmentally suitable locations. Several criteria are used to evaluate theselocations, including whether they are: • administered by BLM • out of the 100-year floodplain and wetlands • away from shallow ground water• in an area of generally flat topography• within a reasonable haul distance • in an area where soil borrow material is available4ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST• away from cultural features and threatened and endangered species habitat• away from other geologic hazardsA Geographic Information System (GIS) can be used to evaluate sites againstthese criteria. The NSTC used ArcView to evaluate potential repository loca-tions at the Ute-Ulay site in the Henson Creek watershed in Colorado. Dataon each of the criteria were obtained, weighted as to suitability, and enteredinto ArcView as separate layers. The composite view is shown in Figure 1. Thedarkest shading shows the most suitable areas. Though few areas were foundto be suitable, the GIS was helpful in identifying potential repository areas inthis steep, high-altitude valley.Figure 1. Repository suitability analysis for Henson Creek watershed.DesignDESIGNS DEPEND ON SITE CONDITIONS, especially the characteristicsof the waste and the climate, hydrology, and topography of the site. Thesefactors are evaluated during site characterization. Waste characteristics areinvestigated through total metal and leachable metal concentrations, acid-baseaccounting, and permeability. Repository locations are investigated with5ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COSTdrilling or test pits to determine depth to ground water and to collect samplesfor grain size, Proctor compaction, permeability, and agronomic analyses.Floodplain determinations are made from existing flood insurance maps orwatershed modeling.BLM lands are mostly arid, receiving less than 12 inches of precipitationannually, and are subject to long, hot summers with high evapotranspirationrates. Some BLM lands are wetter and more mountainous, with coolertemperatures. For convenience in discussing design, these climatic conditionshave been separated into four categories:1. Less than 12 inches precipitation, no shallow ground water2. Less than 12 inches precipitation, shallow ground water3. Greater than 12 inches precipitation, no shallow ground water4. Greater than 12 inches precipitation, shallow ground waterBLM uses the Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model,version 3.07, or other models, such as SoilCover, to determine infiltrationthrough the cap material and to investigate the utility of different cap con-figurations. Generally, for category 1 in our arid environments, 24 inches ofsuitable soil cover with a hydraulic conductivity of 10-5 cm/sec or less willshow no infiltration through the mine waste. In marginally wet conditions(>12 inches/year), or if the tailings are very acid-generating or leachable, acapillary barrier composed of 6–12 inches of gravel in combination with thesoil cover will preclude infiltration. For highly acidic tailings, deep amendmentwith lime has been used to stabilize the tailings. For wetter areas (categories 3and 4), an impermeable liner is required to prevent infiltration. When shallowground water (less than 15 feet below the waste) is encountered, a bottomliner may be required in combination with a top liner. Cost of Mine WasteRepositoriesBLM IS INTERESTED in evaluating the cost of repositories to ensurethat government funding is reasonably spent and to help predict costs duringthe planning stages of cleanup. Although there are costs associated with site6ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COSTcharacterization, design, construction oversight, permits, operation, andmaintenance, only the direct capital costs of constructing the repository areaddressed in this section. Construction costs include mobilization, excavation,hauling and placement of mine waste, cap placement, revegetation on therepository, and run-on controls. Costs for stream restoration or reclamation ofcleaned-up areas are not included.Cost data for BLM repositories are presented in Table 1. Since 1998, BLM hasdesigned or constructed 13 repositories in several States, including SouthDakota (Figure 2), Montana, Idaho, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,Oregon, and Washington. For each repository, hauling distance, which is animportant cost factor, was less than 4 miles round trip.Table 1. Mean unit costs/cubic yard disposed for different types of repositories.Unlined Repositories (n=8) Lined Repositories (n=5)Mobilization $0.42 $1.83Repository preparation $0.67 $3.09Excavation, hauling, placement, $4.10 $10.69and compaction of mine wasteSoil cap construction $1.59 $6.81Revegetation $0.33 $1.41Run-on controls and fencing $0.13 $2.35Total $7.24 $26.18The costs shown in Table 1 were estimated using industry sources such as R.S.Means Environmental Cost Data or acquired from bidding and constructioncost data. Based on costs, the repositories were subdivided into two categories:1. repositories with simple soil covers or simple soil covers with capillarybarriers2. lined repositoriesFor unlined repositories, BLM’s experience is that the total volume of wastesto be placed in the repository is the key factor that can predict cost (2001dollars). Smaller sites require a higher cost per cubic yard disposed than largersites due to economies of scale. Linear regression was used to investigate the7ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COSTFigure 2. Belle Eldridge repository, Deadwood, South Dakota.relationship between volume and cost (Figure 3). Because the relationship is not linear, the natural logarithm (ln) of the volume was regressed with the costper cubic yard and the following equation was determined:Cost= -1.98 x ln(volume) + 31(unlined sites)Figure 3. Regression plot for unlined repositories.The correlation coefficient (R2) for this relationship is 0.6, indicating thatmore data points are needed to satisfy normal statistical confidence. However,this information is helpful in preliminary project planning and cost estimating.The relationship between volume and cost seems to hold for volumes up toapproximately 500,000 cubic yards. While additional data are needed to betterpredict the costs for larger sites, costs are expected to level out around $5 to$6 per cubic yard.Regression Plot of Cost vs Ln VolumeCost $0 5 104020015 20YPredicted Y8ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COSTTo date, too few sites have been completed with liners to estimate the costsusing regression. The 2001 mean cost per cubic yard is $26.18 for lined sites.ConclusionONE OF BLM’S PRIMARY STRATEGIES to help remediate abandonedmine tailings sites in stream channels is to construct mine waste repositories.Repository sites are selected using environmental criteria that consider floodingand ground-water conditions, cultural features, and endangered specieshabitat, and practical criteria such as hauling distance, availability of soilborrow, and site slope. Various designs are used for repositories, ranging fromsimple soil covers in arid environments to engineered caps with capillarybarriers or geosynthetic liners, depending on precipitation and characteristicsof the waste. Repository construction costs appear to be related to the volumeof waste to be placed.The mention of trade names or commercial products does not constituteendorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government.

Abandoned Mine Waste Repositories: Site Selction, Design, and Cost

UNL | Libraries

University of Nebraska - Lincoln 
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln 
U.S. Bureau of Land Management Papers U.S. Department of the Interior 
2003 
Abandoned Mine Waste Repositories: Site Selction, Design, and 
Cost 
K. L. Ford 
National Science and Technology Center 
M. Walker 
U.S. Forest Service 
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usblmpub 
 Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons 
Ford, K. L. and Walker, M., "Abandoned Mine Waste Repositories: Site Selction, Design, and Cost" (2003). 
U.S. Bureau of Land Management Papers. 1. 
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usblmpub/1 
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of the Interior at 
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. Bureau of Land 
Management Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 
U.S. Department of the Interior • Bureau of Land Management
Technical Note 410
April 2003
Production services provided by:
Information and Communications Staff
Publishing Staff (303-236-6547)
Janine Koselak: Layout and Design
Linda Hill: Editing
Lee Barkow, Director
National Science & Technology Center
P.O. Box 25047
Denver, Colorado 80225-0047
The Bureau of Land Management’s National Science
and Technology Center supports other BLM offices by
providing a broad spectrum of services in areas such as
physical, biological, and social science assessments; 
architecture and engineering support; library assistance;
mapping science; photo imaging; geographic information
systems applications; and publications support. 
Available at:
www.blm.gov/nstc/library/techno2.htm
Technical Note 410
BLM/ST/ST-02/002+3596
Technical Note 410
April 2003
by:
K.L. Ford
Bureau of Land Management
National Science and Technology Center
M. Walker
U.S. Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Region
ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST
SUGGESTED CITATION:
Ford, K.L. and M. Walker. 2002. Abandoned mine waste repositories: site
selection, design, and cost. Technical Note 410. BLM/ST/ST-02/002+3596.
Bureau of Land Management Web-based report available online at
http://www.blm.gov/nstc/library/techno2.htm.
iii
ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST
Contents
Abstract  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Keywords  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Site Selection  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Design  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Cost of Mine Waste Repositories  . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8

1ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST
Abstract
THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (BLM) is conducting priority
cleanups of abandoned mine sites on public lands. Typically, these sites contain
tailings piles, cyanide heaps, and rock dumps that historically were constructed
in or near drainages and now are releasing pollutants into watersheds. In
compliance with regulations, BLM selects the most environmentally suitable
site for removing mining waste and placing it into repositories. Repositories
have different design features, and the design selected should be based on
site-specific conditions and the results of water balance models. A Geographic
Information System (GIS) can be a useful tool for screening and selecting a
repository site. Industry sources and construction data from existing repositories
can be used to predict construction costs. BLM found that the key factor in
predicting cost is the volume of wastes to be placed.
Keywords
Abandoned mines
Hazardous waste
Mine waste
Repository
Surface water contamination
Tailings

3ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST
Introduction
THERE ARE A LARGE NUMBER of abandoned hard rock mining sites on
the 261 million acres of public lands administered by the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) in the 12 Western States. While the actual number is not
known, there are currently over 9,000 such sites in BLM’s inventory. The
National Science and Technology Center (NSTC) is BLM’s technical support
center for investigation and cleanup of abandoned mines and hazardous waste
sites. Within the constraints of available funding, NSTC has investigated
hundreds of abandoned mine sites and has assisted in the cleanup of 15–20
of the worst sites identified.
Typically, these sites involve old milling operations where ores were crushed
and milled using mercury amalgamation, flotation, or cyanide leaching. Thus,
there are often tailings or heap material remaining at the site. These wastes,
which contain high concentrations of metals, cyanide, and often acidity, were
usually placed in drainages with tailing dams. When the dams were no longer
maintained, they often breached and became an ongoing source of contamina-
tion to surface waters. The mining wastes are typically handled as Superfund
wastes under the National Contingency Plan (40 CFR 300.415). One method
for handling historic tailings is to use mine waste repositories. This Technical
Note provides information on site selection, repository design, and the cost of
constructing a repository on BLM public lands.
Site Selection
BLM IS REQUIRED TO LOCATE REPOSITORIES in the most 
environmentally suitable locations. Several criteria are used to evaluate these
locations, including whether they are: 
• administered by BLM 
• out of the 100-year floodplain and wetlands 
• away from shallow ground water
• in an area of generally flat topography
• within a reasonable haul distance 
• in an area where soil borrow material is available
4ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST
• away from cultural features and threatened and endangered species habitat
• away from other geologic hazards
A Geographic Information System (GIS) can be used to evaluate sites against
these criteria. The NSTC used ArcView to evaluate potential repository loca-
tions at the Ute-Ulay site in the Henson Creek watershed in Colorado. Data
on each of the criteria were obtained, weighted as to suitability, and entered
into ArcView as separate layers. The composite view is shown in Figure 1. The
darkest shading shows the most suitable areas. Though few areas were found
to be suitable, the GIS was helpful in identifying potential repository areas in
this steep, high-altitude valley.
Figure 1. Repository suitability analysis for Henson Creek watershed.
Design
DESIGNS DEPEND ON SITE CONDITIONS, especially the characteristics
of the waste and the climate, hydrology, and topography of the site. These
factors are evaluated during site characterization. Waste characteristics are
investigated through total metal and leachable metal concentrations, acid-base
accounting, and permeability. Repository locations are investigated with
5ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST
drilling or test pits to determine depth to ground water and to collect samples
for grain size, Proctor compaction, permeability, and agronomic analyses.
Floodplain determinations are made from existing flood insurance maps or
watershed modeling.
BLM lands are mostly arid, receiving less than 12 inches of precipitation
annually, and are subject to long, hot summers with high evapotranspiration
rates. Some BLM lands are wetter and more mountainous, with cooler
temperatures. For convenience in discussing design, these climatic conditions
have been separated into four categories:
1. Less than 12 inches precipitation, no shallow ground water
2. Less than 12 inches precipitation, shallow ground water
3. Greater than 12 inches precipitation, no shallow ground water
4. Greater than 12 inches precipitation, shallow ground water
BLM uses the Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model,
version 3.07, or other models, such as SoilCover, to determine infiltration
through the cap material and to investigate the utility of different cap con-
figurations. Generally, for category 1 in our arid environments, 24 inches of
suitable soil cover with a hydraulic conductivity of 10-5 cm/sec or less will
show no infiltration through the mine waste. In marginally wet conditions
(>12 inches/year), or if the tailings are very acid-generating or leachable, a
capillary barrier composed of 6–12 inches of gravel in combination with the
soil cover will preclude infiltration. For highly acidic tailings, deep amendment
with lime has been used to stabilize the tailings. For wetter areas (categories 3
and 4), an impermeable liner is required to prevent infiltration. When shallow
ground water (less than 15 feet below the waste) is encountered, a bottom
liner may be required in combination with a top liner. 
Cost of Mine Waste
Repositories
BLM IS INTERESTED in evaluating the cost of repositories to ensure
that government funding is reasonably spent and to help predict costs during
the planning stages of cleanup. Although there are costs associated with site
6ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST
characterization, design, construction oversight, permits, operation, and
maintenance, only the direct capital costs of constructing the repository are
addressed in this section. Construction costs include mobilization, excavation,
hauling and placement of mine waste, cap placement, revegetation on the
repository, and run-on controls. Costs for stream restoration or reclamation of
cleaned-up areas are not included.
Cost data for BLM repositories are presented in Table 1. Since 1998, BLM has
designed or constructed 13 repositories in several States, including South
Dakota (Figure 2), Montana, Idaho, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,
Oregon, and Washington. For each repository, hauling distance, which is an
important cost factor, was less than 4 miles round trip.
Table 1. Mean unit costs/cubic yard disposed for different types of repositories.
Unlined Repositories (n=8) Lined Repositories (n=5)
Mobilization $0.42 $1.83
Repository preparation $0.67 $3.09
Excavation, hauling, placement, $4.10 $10.69
and compaction of mine waste
Soil cap construction $1.59 $6.81
Revegetation $0.33 $1.41
Run-on controls and fencing $0.13 $2.35
Total $7.24 $26.18
The costs shown in Table 1 were estimated using industry sources such as R.S.
Means Environmental Cost Data or acquired from bidding and construction
cost data. Based on costs, the repositories were subdivided into two categories:
1. repositories with simple soil covers or simple soil covers with capillary
barriers
2. lined repositories
For unlined repositories, BLM’s experience is that the total volume of wastes
to be placed in the repository is the key factor that can predict cost (2001
dollars). Smaller sites require a higher cost per cubic yard disposed than larger
sites due to economies of scale. Linear regression was used to investigate the
7ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST
Figure 2. Belle Eldridge repository, Deadwood, South Dakota.
relationship between volume and cost (Figure 3). Because the relationship is 
not linear, the natural logarithm (ln) of the volume was regressed with the cost
per cubic yard and the following equation was determined:
Cost= -1.98 x ln(volume) + 31(unlined sites)
Figure 3. Regression plot for unlined repositories.
The correlation coefficient (R2) for this relationship is 0.6, indicating that
more data points are needed to satisfy normal statistical confidence. However,
this information is helpful in preliminary project planning and cost estimating.
The relationship between volume and cost seems to hold for volumes up to
approximately 500,000 cubic yards. While additional data are needed to better
predict the costs for larger sites, costs are expected to level out around $5 to
$6 per cubic yard.
Regression Plot of Cost vs Ln Volume
C
os
t $
0 5 10
40
20
0
15 20
Y
Predicted Y
8ABANDONED MINE WASTE REPOSITORIES: SITE SELECTION, DESIGN, AND COST
To date, too few sites have been completed with liners to estimate the costs
using regression. The 2001 mean cost per cubic yard is $26.18 for lined sites.
Conclusion
ONE OF BLM’S PRIMARY STRATEGIES to help remediate abandoned
mine tailings sites in stream channels is to construct mine waste repositories.
Repository sites are selected using environmental criteria that consider flooding
and ground-water conditions, cultural features, and endangered species
habitat, and practical criteria such as hauling distance, availability of soil
borrow, and site slope. Various designs are used for repositories, ranging from
simple soil covers in arid environments to engineered caps with capillary
barriers or geosynthetic liners, depending on precipitation and characteristics
of the waste. Repository construction costs appear to be related to the volume
of waste to be placed.
The mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government.



https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;context=usblmpub

Abandoned Mine Waste Repositories: Site Selction, Design, and Cost

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska

UNL | Libraries