This paper contains the performance analysis and benchmarking of two popular
visual SLAM Algorithms: RGBD-SLAM and RTABMap. The dataset used for the
analysis is the TUM RGBD Dataset from the Computer Vision Group at TUM. The
dataset selected has a large set of image sequences from a Microsoft Kinect
RGB-D sensor with highly accurate and time-synchronized ground truth poses from
a motion capture system. The test sequences selected depict a variety of
problems and camera motions faced by Simultaneous Localization and Mapping
(SLAM) algorithms for the purpose of testing the robustness of the algorithms
in different situations. The evaluation metrics used for the comparison are
Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) and Relative Pose Error (RPE). The analysis
involves comparing the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the two metrics and the
processing time for each algorithm. This paper serves as an important aid in
the selection of SLAM algorithm for different scenes and camera motions. The
analysis helps to realize the limitations of both SLAM methods. This paper also
points out some underlying flaws in the used evaluation metrics.Comment: 7 pages, 4 figure