Impacts of Reputation for Quality on Company Responsibility and Product-related Dangers in times of Product-recall and Public Complaints Crises: Results from an Empirical Investigation
This research paper analyzes the role of pre-crisis
reputation for quality on consumers ’ perceptions of
product-related dangers and company responsibility
in product-harm crises with varying risk information.
We consider (non-) substantiated public
complaints incorporating low and moderate product-
related risks, as well as product-recall situations
involving serious risks to the health and safety of
consumers. Hypotheses are derived from theories
and concepts of consumer behavioural psychology.
These are then tested empirically by using an
online experiment. The effects of reputation are
analyzed across different crises contexts to derive
some general insights useful for crisis management.
In order to shed light on situational differences of
the reputation mechanism its effect on individual
crisis level will also be considered. In general, the
analysis fi nds that reputation for quality is capable
of positively infl uencing the perceptions of company
responsibility and thereby shielding the
manufacturer from receiving blame. However, an
established reputation for high product quality
prior to the crisis fails to positively impacting
consumers ’ perceptions of problem severity. The
crisis-specifi c effects of reputation turn out to be
ambivalent. On the basis of these fi ndings, recommendations
to crisis managers and relevant avenues
for future research are derived
