In this paper1, we investigate and discuss the underlying nature
of the requirements traceability problem. Our work is based on
empirical studies, involving over 100 practitioners, and an
evaluation of current support. We introduce the distinction
between pre-requirements specification (pre-RS) traceability
and post-requirements specification (post-RS) traceability, to
demonstrate why an all-encompassing solution to the problem is
unlikely, and to provide a framework through which to
understand its multifaceted nature. We report how the majority
of the problems attributed to poor requirements traceability are
due to inadequate pre-RS traceability and show the fundamental
need for improvements here. In the remainder of the paper, we
present an analysis of the main barriers confronting such
improvements in practice, identify relevant areas in which
advances have been (or can be) made, and make
recommendations for research
