This paper seeks to contribute to the U.S. housing finance reform
conversation by providing a critical assessment of the various types of
policy proposals that have been offered. There appears to be a broad
consensus to maintain explicit government guarantees for certain
narrowly defined borrower populations, such as FHA insurance guarantees
for low- and moderate-income and first-time homebuyers. However, the
expected role of the federal government in the broader housing finance
system is in dispute: ranging from no role; to insuring against only
extreme or tail events; to insuring against all losses. However, most
proposals agree that any public insurance be priced and available only
for loans meeting pre-specified criteria in an effort to limit taxpayer exposure