This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the link in this record.Previous research has found that people frequently provide
incorrect predictions about the path of moving objects when given
an idealised physics problem to solve. The aim of this research was
to explore whether these incorrect predictions are due to the
application of an incorrect naïve physics theory, whether incorrect
perceptions generated from past experiences lead to
misconceptions of how moving objects behave, or whether it is a
combination of both. Thirty-one participants volunteered to take
part in the experiment which followed a two (experience
congruent/incongruent with naïve physics theory) by two (carried
versus free-moving object) within-subject design. The dependent
variable was participant response (straight down or curved
forwards). Results of the study revealed that participants provided
answers both consistent and inconsistent with the naïve physics
theory. This suggests that responses were primarily elicited
through the retrieval of associatively-mediated memories of similar
scenarios - some of which contain perceptual illusions. Possible
methodological limitations and alternative theoretical explanations
are discussed, along with practical and theoretical implications for
education and learning
