CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Potential benefits and risks of clinical xenotransplantation
Authors
D Ayares
DKC Cooper
Publication date
1 July 2012
Publisher
'Dove Medical Press Ltd.'
Doi
Abstract
The transplantation of organs and cells from pigs into humans could overcome the critical and continuing problem of the lack of availability of deceased human organs and cells for clinical transplantation. Developments in the genetic engineering of pigs have enabled considerable progress to be made in the experimental laboratory in overcoming the immune barriers to successful xenotransplantation. With regard to pig organ xenotransplantation, antibody- and cell-mediated rejection have largely been overcome, and the current major barrier is the development of coagulation dysregulation. This is believed to be due to a combination of immune activation of the vascular endothelial cells of the graft and molecular incompatibilities between the pig and primate coagulation-anticoagulation systems. Pigs with new genetic modifications specifically directed to this problem are now becoming available. With regard to less complex tissues, such as islets (for the treatment of diabetes), neuronal cells (for the treatment of Parkinson's disease), and corneas, the remaining barriers are less problematic, and graft survival in nonhuman primate models extends for > 1 year in all three cases. In planning the initial clinical trials, consideration will be concentrated on the risk-benefit ratio, based to a large extent on the results of preclinical studies in nonhuman primates. If the benefit to the patient is anticipated to be high, eg, insulin-independent control of glycemia, and the potential risks low, eg, minimal risk of transfer of a porcine infectious agent, then a clinical trial would be justified. © 2012 Cooper and Ayares, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
D-Scholarship@Pitt
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:167...
Last time updated on 19/07/2013
Name not available
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:167...
Last time updated on 15/12/2016
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.2147%2Ftrrm.s31481
Last time updated on 05/06/2019
Name not available
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:167...
Last time updated on 23/11/2016