CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Cognitive and behavioral predictors of light therapy use
Authors
A Bandura
A Baundra
+48 more
A Tuunainen
AJ Claxton
Antonio Verdejo García
BH Marcus
BH Marcus
BT Mausbach
BW Lundahl
C Abraham
CJ Stepnowsky Jr
DD Burns
DD Burns
EE Michalak
EE Michalak
EL Worthington
G Pail
GT Wilson
I Yovel
JA Sirey
JE Maddux
JO Prochaska
JO Prochaska
JO Prochaska
JT Austin
Julie A. Schumacher
Kathryn A. Roecklein
KJ Rohan
L Radloff
M Conner
M Fishbein
M Terman
ME Thase
measurement Murray G. Seasonality: the importance of longitudinal
Megan A. Miller
MM Weissman
MR DiMatteo
MS Aloia
N Watanabe
Natalie C. Ernecoff
NC Gyurcsik
P Sheeran
P Sheeran
PJ Schwartz
R Flory
RA Neimeyer
RN Golden
RW Lam
TD Borkovec
WR Miller
Publication date
1 January 2012
Publisher
'Public Library of Science (PLoS)'
Doi
Cite
View
on
PubMed
Abstract
Objective: Although light therapy is effective in the treatment of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and other mood disorders, only 53-79% of individuals with SAD meet remission criteria after light therapy. Perhaps more importantly, only 12-41% of individuals with SAD continue to use the treatment even after a previous winter of successful treatment. Method: Participants completed surveys regarding (1) social, cognitive, and behavioral variables used to evaluate treatment adherence for other health-related issues, expectations and credibility of light therapy, (2) a depression symptoms scale, and (3) self-reported light therapy use. Results: Individuals age 18 or older responded (n = 40), all reporting having been diagnosed with a mood disorder for which light therapy is indicated. Social support and self-efficacy scores were predictive of light therapy use (p's<.05). Conclusion: The findings suggest that testing social support and self-efficacy in a diagnosed patient population may identify factors related to the decision to use light therapy. Treatments that impact social support and self-efficacy may improve treatment response to light therapy in SAD. © 2012 Roecklein et al
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Name not available
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:127...
Last time updated on 23/11/2016
CiteSeerX
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.936.7...
Last time updated on 01/11/2017
Name not available
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:127...
Last time updated on 15/12/2016
Directory of Open Access Journals
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:doaj.org/article:0c3890b51...
Last time updated on 14/10/2017
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pon...
Last time updated on 01/04/2019
Public Library of Science (PLOS)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 18/09/2018
CiteSeerX
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.1072....
Last time updated on 07/12/2020
D-Scholarship@Pitt
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:127...
Last time updated on 19/07/2013