CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Yours ever (well, maybe): Studies and signposts in letter writing
Authors
A Gilliland
A Gilliland-Swetland
+34 more
AC Benson
B Alexander
CJ Golden
D Goodman
DA Gerber
E Davies
G Bell
G Saltzman
J Dijck Van
J Douglas
J Freeman
J Lanier
J Mifflin
J Mifflin
K Dierks
K Wright
KB Florey
M Caswell
M Garvey
M O’Shaughnessy
M Shepherd
PM Dover
R Darnton
Richard J. Cox
RJ Cox
S Jones
S Murray
S Neef
S Ricci
SJ Solomon
T Cook
T Mallon
T Mallon
TH Hyry
Publication date
1 January 2010
Publisher
'Springer Science and Business Media LLC'
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Electronic mail and other digital communications technologies seemingly threaten to end the era of handwritten and typed letters, now affectionately seen as part of snail mail. In this essay, I analyze a group of popular and scholarly studies about letter writing-including examples of pundits critiquing the use of e-mail, etiquette manuals advising why the handwritten letter still possesses value, historians and literary scholars studying the role of letters in the past and what it tells us about our present attitudes about digital communications technologies, and futurists predicting how we will function as personal archivists maintaining every document including e-mail. These are useful guideposts for archivists, providing both a sense of the present and the past in the role, value and nature of letters and their successors. They also provide insights into how such documents should be studied, expanding our gaze beyond the particular letters, to the tools used to create them and the traditions dictating their form and function. We also can discern a role for archivists, both for contributing to the literature about documents and in using these studies and commentaries, suggesting not a new disciplinary realm but opportunities for new interdisciplinary work. Examining a documentary form makes us more sensitive to both the innovations and traditions as it shifts from the analog to the digital; we can learn not to be caught up in hysteria or nostalgia about one form over another and archivists can learn about what they might expect in their labors to document society and its institutions. At one time, paper was part of an innovative technology, with roles very similar to the Internet and e-mail today. It may be that the shifts are far less revolutionary than is often assumed. Reading such works also suggests, finally, that archivists ought to rethink how they view their own knowledge and how it is constructed and used. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
D-Scholarship@Pitt
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:582...
Last time updated on 19/07/2013
Name not available
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:582...
Last time updated on 23/11/2016
Name not available
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:d-scholarship.pitt.edu:582...
Last time updated on 15/12/2016
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10502-010-...
Last time updated on 05/06/2019