Prolonged thoracic duct drainage as an immunosuppressive adjunct was accomplished in 96 per cent of organ recipients upon whom it was attempted

Koep, LJ

Starzl, TE

Weill, R

English

PubMed

Weil III, R

Name not available

The technique of prolonged thoracic duct drainage in transplantation

D-Scholarship@Pitt

------------~1f·1/ THE TECHNIQUE OF PROLONGED THORACIC DUCT DRAINAGE IN TRANSPLANTATION Lawrence J. Koep, M.D., F.A.C.S., Richard Weil III, ~KaKI F.A.C.S., and Thomas E. Starzl, M.D., F.A.C.S., Denver, Colorado THE USE of thoracic duct drainage for immuno-su ppression in transplantation has been pre-viously reported by several groups, including our own (9). Maximum benefit requires prolonged lymphocyte depletion rather than temporary diversion. The success in establishing prolonged thoracic duel drainage has been variably report-ed as 40 per cent by F ranksson and associates (3), 50 per cent by Traeger and co-workers ( 10), 55 per cent by Murray and collaborators (7), 60 per cent by Fish and colleagues (2) and 80 per cent bv Johnson and co-authors (5), With the use of the techniques to be described and using readily available materials, we have been able to establish prolonged thoracic duct drainage in 86 of the 90 patients upon whom it was attempted. :-.1ATERIALS A:"O :-.1ETHOOS The anatomy of the thoracic duct and the em-bryologic expl;nation for its many variations has been described by Davis ( 1 ). Of particular inter-est are those variations of the terminal portion. reported by Greenfield and Gottlieb (4). In 1 to 5 per cent. the thoracic duct terminates on the right side of the neck. The usual termination is in the region of the left angulus venosus, emptying into either the subclavian or the internal jugular vein. Five per cent of the thoracic ducts enter the left innominate vein. In 77 to 89 per cent of the cadavers. the thoracic duct ends in a single trunk. When multiple ducts join the venous system. all but the one cannulated must be totally interrupt-ed at operation to prevent collateral drainage away from the fistula. Another anatomic variant of surgical interest is the thoracic duct island or insula produced by the divergence and reconver-gence of main thoracic duct trunks. Connections . From the Department of Surgen. L'niversitv of Colorado Health Snences Center, and the \"eterans :\dministration Hospital. Denver. This work was supported hv research grants from the \'eterans :\d· mtnlStrallon, by C;rant ."0. :\!\\·07772 from the National Institutes of Health and by Grant :"os. RR-0005 J and RR·00069 from the Gen· eral Clinical Research Centers Program of the DiVISion of Research Resources. !\;ational Institutes of Health. 61 with left cervical and subclavian lymphatic branches further complicate these thoracic duct insulae. Careful dissection of the branches and ligation of these tributaries will. eventuall y, yield a confluence capable of accommodating a drain-age catheter that the individual branches would not. A transverse left supraclavicular incision is used to approach the cervical thoracic duct. The clavicular head of the sternocleidomastoid muscle is divided. The internal jugular vein is dissected for at least 2 centimeters to its junction with the subclavian vein. Division and ligation of small branches of the internal jugular vein. at this time, permits considerable retraction on the internal jugular later without injury, The omohyoid fas-cia is opened. and occasionally, the omohyoid muscle is partially divided. Dissection is begun along the anterior surface of the subclavian vein and proceeds posteriorly along its superior sur-face near the angulus venosus until the thoracic duct is identified. The duct is ligated and divided at its venous junction. Once ligated, the thoracic duct dilates. facili-tating circumferential dissection. Lymphatic tributaries coming from the left arm and upper part of the neck are ligated and divided from the main trunk, but branches going toward the thor-ax are preserved, since they may be contributors to an unsuspected insula. C sually. it is necessary to dissect the thoracic duct for a distance of sever-al centimeters until it begins its descent into the superior mediastinum. Onlv in this way can the collection catheter be mani pulated through the multiple valves. Anterior and medial retraction of the internal jugUlar vein provides good expo-sure as the duct passes inferiorl\" near the esoph-agus. \Vhen the descent of the main thoracic duct is identified. it is opened and probed with lac-rimal duct probes and calibrated to accommodate comfortably the largest possible catheter (Fig. 1 ), The effective use of the probes is a particular-ly important step if the catheter is to be inserted for any distance. The repeated passage of probes sC 62 .')urj{tTY. Gvnl'coiogy &- Obstl'tncs . Ju/y 71)80 VI)/ume 751 , 'i ;:orooe ,n ;{,' the,a: c jcct &-,\ :a·t-e·er ~KK - / Insertec jown \ \ I thoraCIC duct nto meOloslonum t ,) pouble ...... ,!'", lUmen cannula FI(;. 1. Left cervical approach to the thoracic duct. Divi-sion of the thoracic duct near its terminus at the angulus veno-sus permits dissection and probing preparatory to insertion of t he catheter. of graded size can rupture, obstructing valve leaRets, and can dilate stricture-like narrowings. tvfost commonly, two or three such narrowed areas are encountered before the thoracic duct reaches the superior mediastinum. After completing the probing and dilating maneuvers, the tip of a double lumen catheter is tunneled into the wound and advanced a min-imum of 3, and preferably 10, centimeters down the duct. Swan-Ganz catheters have ideal can-nula characteristics. They are manufactured in various sizes. Sizes 4, 5, 6 and 7 have all been ac-ceptable. With the Row directed catheter, the rubber balloon covering the proximal aperture must be removed. The relative stiffness of the catheters has caused erosions when a catheter tip abbutted an angulation in the thoracic duct. To avoid this problem, the catheters have, more re-cently, been withdrawn 1 centimeter after place-ment rather than leaving them at their maximum depth of insertion. Torsion on the mobilized portion of the duct will occlude Row, but a stabilizing device at the catheter tip has not been necessary as long as the catheter tip is advanced beyond the mobilized portion of duct into the mediastinum. A silk liga-ture is then used to cinch the mobilized duct around the catheter. Since this li2;ature may eventually cut through the duct, a long subcuta-neous tunnel helps prevent a cutaneous lymph fistula. A large central venous catheter is inserted for lymph return. A branch of the external or the in-ternal jugular vein is usually used. although a purse-string suture in the internal jugular or the divided stump of the thoracic duct has been used. Finally, careful layered closure of the sterno-cleido~astoidI platysma and skin is mandatory to prevent a cutaneous lymph fistula. If the cervical thoracic duct cannot be located or has been used before, a right thoracic ap-proach may be indicated for thoracic duct can-nulation (Fig. 2). Through a fifth interspace right posterolateral thoracotomy, the esophagus is dissected anteriorly just inferior to the azygos vein. Almost directly posterior to the esophagus usually one but, occasionally, more thoracic trunks can be identified. The largest duct can easily be cannulated and other branches ligated. The collecting catheter enters the chest anteriorly at the second interspace, curves over the hilus of the lung and des<;ends posteriorly to enter the duct. The mediastinal pleura is carefully re-paired to prevent a chylothorax. The thoracic duct cannula requires prompt and continuous care, beginning before the wound is closed. An infusion at 20 milliliters per hour of normal saline solution, to which has been added 2 U.S.P. units of heparin per milliliter, has been effective in preventing dotting in the catheter, even when the lymph has been bloody. The small side lumen has customarily been used for infu-sion of the heparinized saline solution, while lymph has been collected at the larger distal lumen. The wound and catheter exit sites are main-tained according to our parenteral hyperalimen-tation catheter protocol of daily dressings and local antibiotic ointment. Systemic antibiotic pro-phylaxis for staphylococci is also provided. Lymph collection is in a closed system using blood collection bags prepared without any an-ticoagulant additives. The heparin irrigant is sufficient to avoid any coagulation in the bags. At the beginning, collection was in standard blood collection bags to which a transfer pack was at-tached. Similar, but more satisfactory, specially made, collection bags are now commercially available. After the lymph bags are centrifuged at 4,000 revolutions per minute for ten minutes, the cell free supernatant is pressed into the ap-pendage bag and refrigerated until reinfusion. Koep ct at.: TECH;-';IQL"E OF PROLO;-';GED THORACIC DeCT DRAI],;AGE 1\ TRA:\SPLA:-';TATIO:-'; 63 Right posterior lateral thorocotomy~ ./ for ./ ./' thoracic duct / Azygos - - -~K vein divided Hilum of lung . \ I -:- \ .c::--, ,-/ ~ \ Esophagus ~Kg--- \ c .----, Tho ra C led u C t 6 th rt b FIG. 2. Right transthoracic approach to the thoracic duct. Reflection of the esoph-agus anteriorly permits cannulation of the thoracic duct just inferior to the azygos vein. The cell sediment consists almost entirely of small lymphocytes. Approximately 85 per cent of the removed lymph is retrieved for reinfusion. The collection for one day is processed, and the lymph is reinfused continuously by the central venous catheter throughout the following day. Most patients who are receiving an unrestricted oral regimen do not require replacement of the volume disparity between collected and returned lymph. If vasomotor instability develops from plasma volume deficit, the difference is made up with normal saline solution or lactated Ringer's solution. The lymph is cultured two times per week. If bacterial growth is found, lymph infu-sions are stopped. and the lymph drainage is re-placed entirely with electrolyte solution until three successiv'e negative lymph cultures are ob-tained. The exchange of electrolyte solution for discarded lymph has been possible for as long as two months in prospective kidney recipients without harmful effects, other than a gradual fall of serum proteins. However, when patients are being prepared for renal transplantation with thoracic duct drainage, dialysis care must be more intensive than usual to prevent hypoten-sion, and supplemental albumin is often neces-sary. Some patients with end-stage liver disease and ascites also have required special care with fluid replacement, since the thoracic duct drain-age may be as much as 1 liter per hour. Reasonable daily care has enabled a single catheter to function through the entire period of lymphoid depletion in the vast majority of pa-tients. Operative revision, with or without cath-eter replacement, is undertaken promptly if the catheter has become plugged, dislodged or brok-en. This has been done under both local and gen-eral anesthesia and has, almost invariably, been successful. To terminate thoracic duct drainage, heparin irrigation is stopped and the collection bag elevated by daily increments until there has been no flow for a day, after which the catheter is removed. Rarely, lymph accumulated in the sub-cutaneous tissue or a fistula formed as the bag was raised. In these situations. the catheter was -• m am m pulled and a cuLmeous lymph fIstula allowed to dose slowly for several davs. In no patient was an operation required for a persistent fIstula. REst'l.TS Thoracic duct drainage was successful for 21 to II <) days in 86 of 90 patients in whom it was attempted. Sixty-one were kidney homograft recipients, 26 were liver recipients and three had heart or pancreas transplants. The average daily lymph output in those with renal disease aver-aged nearly 5 liters (9), while those with liver disease produced even more (8). Approximately .2 billion lymphocytes per day are removed. Reoperation and revision of the thoracic duct fistula were necessary in 15 of the 86 patients. Thoracic duct drainage could not be provided in four patients, despite a secondary transthor-acic attempt in two. In one patient, the entire thoracic duct clotted after liver transplantation. Three renal recipients had unfavorable anatomy with multiple ducts too small to permit cannula-tion. In the first 30 patients, three failures oc-curred. There was no mortality directly attributable to thoracic duct drainage. Bacterial growth in the collected lymph was documented in one-quarter of 86 patients, but septicemia was unusual. Revi-sion of antibiotic coverage and substitution of lymph replacement with electrolyte solution were effective treatment. In one patient with a transthoracic catheter, empyema developed, and decortication was required. ~linor complications included local accumula-tions of lymph in the neck, transient edema of the face or left arm, temporary Horner's syndrome in two patients, one example of transient right chylothorax following removal of the cannula and one retained subcutaneous catheter which was removed later. In three kidney recipients, ascites developed for a few days after removal of the catheter. The presumed chyloperitoneum promptly receded with diuretic therapy. afpCl!ppfl~ The profound immunodepression caused by thoracic duct drainage has been known for nearly 20 years, yet the procedure has not been widely used in transplantation, apparently largely be-cause of its unreliability and presumed inconven-ience. Experience reported herein has demon-strated that almost all organ recipients can have whatever benefits accrue from this kind of lymph-oid depletion. Furthermore, the patients have been able to be mobile within the limits imposed by a rolling intravenous stand for infusion with a basket for collecting bags at its base. As many as 20 patients at a time have had lymph fistulas in place. The principles of success have included deep insertion of a double lumen catheter which allows simultaneous infusion and collections as well as meticulous nursing care. The most effective use to which thoracic duct drainage can be put for transplantation is under study. Evidence of Walker and associates (11), Traeger and colleagues ( 10) and our own expe-rience (9) has suggested the importance of treat-ment before transplantation. The changes in im-munologic reactivity. caused by thoracic duct drainage and the time curve of these changes have been particularly well documented by Machleder and Paulus (6) in patients treated for autoimmune disorders. SUMMARY Prolonged thoracic duct drainage as an immu-nosuppressive adjunct was accomplished in 96 per cent of organ recipients upon whom it was attempted. REFERE:-iCES 1. DAVIS, H. K. A statistical studv of the thoracic duct in man. Am. J. Anat .. 1914, 17: ill. .., FISH, J. C .. SARLES, H. E., and RBI\IERS, A. R., JR. Thoracic duct fistulas in man. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet., 1970, 131869. 3. FRASKSSOS, C., LUSDGRES. G .. !DvfAdslDspl~I G., and RISGDES. O. Drainage of thoracic duct lymph in renal transplant patients. Transplantation. 1976. 21: 133. 4. GREDiFIELD, J., and GOTTLIEB. !'vi. I. Variations in the terminal portion of the human thoracic duct. Arch. Surg., 1956, 73: 955. 5. JOHSSON, H. K., NIBLACK, G. D., T."LLE:-iT, M. B., and RICHIE, R. E. Immunologic preparation for cadaver reo nal transplant by thoracic duct drainage. Transplant. Proc., 1977,9: 1499. 6. MACHLEDER, H. I., and PAULUS, H. Clinical and im-munological alterations observed in patients undergoing long-term thoracic duct drainage. Surgery, 1978, 84: 157. 7. MURRAY, J. E., tfipl~I R. E., TIL:-iEY, N. L., and others. Five years' experience in renal transplantation with immunosuppressive drugs; survival, function. com-plications. and the role of lvmphocyte depletion by thor-acic duct fistula. Ann. Surg., 1968, 168: 416. 8. STARZL, T. E .. KOEP, L. J., WElL III, R., and others. Thoracic duct drainage in organ transplantation; will it permit better immunosuppression? Transplant. Proc., 1979,9: 276. 9. STARZL, T. E., WElL III, R .. KOEP, L. J., and others. Thoracic duct fistula and renal transplantation. Ann. Surg., in press. 10. TRAEGER, J., TOURAI:-iE, J. L., ARCHI!'.IBAUD, J. P .. and others. Thoracic duct drainage and antilymphocyte globulin for renal transplantation in man. Kidney Int., 1978, Suppl. 8, 13: 103. 11. WALKER, W. E., NIBLACK, G. D .. RICHIE, R. E., and others. Use of thoracic duct drainage in human renal transplantation. Surg. Forum, 1977, 28: 316. i I I ~ I 

http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/3828/1/31735062114065.pdf

The technique of prolonged thoracic duct drainage in transplantation

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Name not available

Name not available

D-Scholarship@Pitt