In this series of 150 orthotopic hepatic transplants, clinically significant gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in 34 patients (23%). Five patients (15%) survived this complication. Enteric perforations occurred in 20 patients following 198 biliary-enteric procedures. Only one patient survived. Enteric perforations unrelated to biliary procedures fared only slightly better with one survivor among eight perforations. These results clearly do not warrant complacency. Modifications advocated are an aggressive diagnostic approach and early reoperation with establishment of extensive peritoneal drainage where necessary

Koep, LJ

Starzl, TE

Weil, R

English

PubMed

Weil III, R

Name not available

Gastrointestinal complications of hepatic transplantation

D-Scholarship@Pitt

Gastrointestinal Complications of Hepatic Transplantation L. J. Koep, T. E. Starzl, and R. Weil III I N THE largest series of orthotopic liver transplants, now numbering 150 patients, the largest number of major complications have arisen in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Of these, hepatic complications comprise the majority. and they have been previously described by both leading centers.12 A smaller number of complications have arisen elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract, but because of their alarming mortality. they have depressed the otherwise improving picture of hepatic transplantation. CLINICAL MATERIAL Gastrointestinal complications occurring in this series of hepatic transplants include bleeding from both upper and lower GI tracts, perforations and fistula, and abdominal abscesses. Many of these complications have previously been described in renal transplan-tation.' h Problems with biliary drainage have arisen both in the transplant, as has been described, and also in the gastrointestinal tract where biliary--enteric continuity is rees-tablished. Enteric leaks at this site constitute one group of gastrointestinal complications unique to hepatic transplantation. The colon complications also appear distinct from those encountered in renal transplantation and have occurred in a much younger age group.7 Abdominal abscesses have been related to a variety of causes, and wide peritoneal drain-age is advocated. Hemorrhage Gastrointestinal bleeding has been one of the more frequent complications following liver transplantation. Relatively small enteric bleeds chemically detectable in stools or gastric aspirate occur in the majority of trans-plant recipients. Clinically significant hem-orrhage occurred in 34/150 patients (23%). In 12 of these 34 patients, definitive therapy Transplantation Proceedmgs, Vol. XI, No. 1 (Marchi, '979 was withheld because bleeding was felt to be only one factor in an otherwise terminal patient. The remaining 22 patients all required surgical intervention for enteric bleeding. Of these, only 5 ultimately survived this complication. Peptic ulcer disease was the most fre-quent etiology of gastrointestinal bleeding (Table I). Duodenal ulcers occurred in five patients, of which two survived this complica-tion. One survivor responded to vagotomy and gastroenterostomy, while the other required first a vagotomy and pyloroplasty followed by antrectomy. Gastroenterostomy or resection alone were not successfuL Two patients devel-oped gastric ulcers. One patient with high fundal ulcers required subtotal gastrectomy for ulcer resection and survived. The other patient underwent vagotomy and gastroen-terostomy but the bleeding site was not recog-nized. The 12 patients with untreated termi-nal enteric bleeds all demonstrated peptic ulcer disease. Gastric ulcer was most frequent, followed by gastritis and duodenal ulcer. Various types of gastric lavage were employed without benefit. Nonpeptic upper gastrointestinal bleeding arose in a variety of cases (Table 2). Four patients bled from esophageal varices. While varices persist endoscopically following he-From the Deparrmenl of Surgery. University oj Colorado Medical Center. and the Veterans Administra-tion Hospital, Denver, Colo. Suppor/ed in part by research grants from the Veter-ans Administration, by Grants AM-I7260 and AM-07772 from the National Institutes oj Health; and by GranIs RR-00051 and RR-00069 from the General Clinical Research CenIers Program oj the Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health. Reprint requests should be addressed 10 L. J. Koep, Department of Surgery, Unil'ersily of Colorado Medical Center. Denver, Colo. 80262. .c 1979 by Grune & Stratton. Inc 0041-/345/19/1101-0056$01.00/0 257 258 KOEP, STARZL. AND WElL Table 1. Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Peptic Disease Etiology Therapy Number Duodenal ulcer 5 Vagotomy and gastroenterostomy 1 (s) Vagotomy and pyloroplasty 3 (s) Gastric resection 2 (s) Gastroenterostomy only Gastric ulcer 2 Subtotal gastrectomy 1 (s) Vagotomy and gastroenterostomy Terminal peptic bleed (s), Successful therapy, No therapy patic transplantation, they do not bleed in the absence of portal-vein thrombosis. All four patients with variceal bleeding demonstrated either thrombosis or cavernous transforma-tion of the portal vein. The Sengstaken-Blakemore tube was used in all four patients with temporary success. One patient went on to sclerotherapy of his varices, but again bled several days later, requiring ligation of varices. This operative ligation appeared unduly treacherous because of the recent sclerotherapy, the esophagus being edema-tous and friable. The enteroentrostomy of the Roux-en- Y jejunostomy was the site of bleeding in two patients. In neither patient was it identified clinically. One patient underwent pyloro-plasty before the enteroenterostomy was opened and the bleeding site ligated. The other patient had both an abscess and bleed-ing from the enteroenterostomy, which was 12 discovered at autopsy. There were individual cases of bleeding from operative trauma to the small bowel. small bowel ulcers, disrup-tion of a duodenostomy closure, and cystic artery bleeding at the gallbladder anastomo-SIS. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding was some-times difficult to distinguish clinically from duodenal bleeding (Table 3). Three patients had ulcerations in the right colon and under-went either right or subtotal colectomy. None survived. Two patients had massive colonic bleeds from pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis involving the colon. Both survived following subtotal colectomies. Gastrointestinal bleeding has arisen at intervals of several days to over a year post-transplant. Frequently, small enteric bleeds occur during this interval. and because these bleeds may be the prelude to a later hemody-namically significant bleed, vigorous diagnos-Table 2. Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Nonpeptic Disease Etiology Esophageal varicies Enteroenterostomy (Roux·en-Y) Small bowel Operative trauma Small bowel ulcers Disrupted duodenal closure Gallbladder (cystic artery bleed) (5). Successful therapy, Therapy Sengstaken· Blakemore 4 Sclerotherapy 1 Oversew Repair Resection Pyloroplasty Repair Repair 1 (s) 2 (5) Number 4 2 2 -GASTROINTESTINAL COMPLICATIONS OF HEPATIC lRANSPLANTATION 259 Table 3. Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding EtIology Therapy Number Cecal ulceration 3 Right celectomy 2 lIeoprectostomy Pneumatosis Cystoides 2 Intestinales lIeoproctostomy 2 (5) (s). Successful therapy. tic maneuvers are indicated. Vital signs, hemoglobulin levels, and overt and occult enteric blood loss are carefully monitored. Panendoscopy has been crucial in all bleeding episodes regardless of how minor they appear. Colonoscopy has been used but has not had a direct therapeutic benefit. Proctoscopy is useful. as anal disease is quite frequent, and the bleeding site sometimes is obscure even at surgery. Radiographic studies have been help-ful in minor bleeding, but in the major bleeds included here. hemodynamic instability pre-cluded this delay. Perforation Gastrointestinal perforations and fistulas were less frequent but even more lethal complications than bleeding. The preponder-ance of leaks were secondary to the establish-ment of biliary drainage. In the 150 patients in this series, 198 biliary procedures have been performed. ChoIedcichocholedochostomy obviates the need for entry into the gastroin-testinal t.ract and thus eliminates enteric leaks from biliary drainage. This has been used in 33 patients and is our preference for adults with suitable ducts. Cholecystoduodenostomy was the earliest drainage technique and has a low incidence of leakage (8%). but was aban-doned for other reasons (Table 4). The ma-jority of the 14 choledochoduodenostomies were conversions from previous cholecysto-duodenostomies. The incidence of leakage in choledochoduodenostomies was an unaccept-able 4Y/c>. but responsibility must rest primarily on the "failed" cholecystoduode-nostomies. The combination of a biliary leak and high enteric Qstula was lethal in all patients. Surgery was directed at providing Table 4. Enteric Leaks Secondary to Biliary Drainage EtIology Cholecystoduodenostomy Choledochoduodenostomy Roux-en- Y jejunostomy No Leaks (No. Procedures) 5 (65) 6 (14) (at new enteroenterostomy) 8 (48) Roux·en-Y jejunostomy (at choledochoJejunostomy) 1 (26) alternative biliary drainage and either drain-ing or closing the duodenum. Currently, when choledochocholedochos-tomy is not feasible, Roux-en-Y jejunostomy to either gallbladder or common duct is preferred. Enteric leaks have arisen at the enteroenterostomy in 17% of the newly constructed Roux-en- Y jejunostomies. Leak-ing enteroenterostomies have been corrected by reinforcing small leaks or reconstructing the anastomosis. Of these eight repairs, two needed revision. One reinforced leak dis-rupted, requiring reconstruction of the entero-enterostomy. The other, also a reinforced leak, developed a second leak a t a separate site that had not appeared compromised at the previous laparotomy. This site was successfully reinforced. While leaks at the enteroenterostomy may occur at any time up to 4 weeks, once this anastomosis has healed, the raux limb biliary drainage may be safely revised at the free end if necessary. The existence of a preexisting Roux-en-Y jejunos-tomy is thus regarded as an asset among potential transplant recipients. Like the duo-denal fistulas. these enteroenterostomy leaks have been highly lethal with only one survivor among eight leaks. Unfortunately. the existence of a previous Roux-en- Y jejunostomy implies previous he-patic surgery. Previous Roux-en-Ys have been injured three times during particularly difficult hepatectomies resulting in fistulas (Table 5). These have not been difficult to manage if well drained, and one patient has survived this complication. Other segments of bowel injured during hepatectomy that devel-oped fistulas are duodenum, one patient: ileum, one patient: colon. two patients. All 260 Table 5. Enteric leaks Independent of Biliary Drainage Etiology Operallve trauma to preexisting Roux-en·Y Operative trauma to ileum Operative trauma to duodenum Operative trauma to colon Duodenal "blow-out"' after Bilroth II Number 3 2 were recognized and initially repaired at transplant except for the ileal injury, which was probably related to the use of electrocau-tery. None of these patients survived. One duodenal stump "blew out" following a Bilroth II in the postoperative period. Open drainage permitted this to mature into an end-duodenal fistula, and the patient sur-vived. Enteric leaks, because of immunosuppres-sion, have sometimes been rather subtle. Free air, when present on a rentgenogram. has been diagnostic. Other times, clinical condi-tion and abdominal signs may provide the only clue. The threshold for laparotomy. particularly in difficult donor hepatectomies and recent biliary-enteric anastomoses, must remain low. When a suppurtative process is encountered in the abdomen. biliary drainage must be maintained or reestablished if it is in jeopardy and the primary process well drained. Pancreatitis While mild edematous pancreatItIs has been a frequent autopsy finding, only two patients have developed hemorrhagic pan-creatitis. One patient with an extensive resec-tion of a hepatoma involving a portion of the distal stomach and pylorus at the time of transplant developed hemorrhagic pancreati-tis. Resection of the pancreatic body and tail were followed shortly by her death. The other case of hemorrhagic pancreatitis was not detected clinically but was an autopsy find-ing. Abscess With the mortality of enteric fistulas and abdominal abscesses unacceptably high. con-KOEP. STARZL. AND WElL Table 6. Open-Wound Management Etiology Fistula secondary to biliary drainage Combined blloary-enteroc fistula Blilary fistula only (choledochocholedochostomy) Abdominal abscess Primary drainage of abscess Number 5 3 3 Abscess drainage at biliary revision 2 Abscess drainage at retransplant Hepatic necrosIs Open management for Incomplete hemostasis Splenic vein rupture 50% pancreatectomy ventional methods of limited drainage have proven inadequate. Complete open drainage of the entire abdominal wound has permitted frequent thorough irrigation and dressing changes. By this method, biliary or enteric fistula are freely drained and secondary abscesses have been avoided. The most frequent indication for open-wound manage-ment has been biliary or combined biliary-enteric fistulas (Table 6). Abscesses drained primarily or in combination with other surgi-cal procedures have also been managed with completely open wounds. Two further cases where pancreatic hemostasis could not be achieved, one following rupture of the splenic vein and the other following partial pancrea-tectomy for hemorrhagic pancreatitis, have required open-wound management. Those patients healing the primary fistula or abdominal abscess are allowed to heal their wounds secondarily or by delayed primary closure. Interestingly, intestinal obstruction, an occasional complication of major surgery or large wounds. has been exceedingly rare. Only one patient developed obstruction following transplant. and this was due to extensive metastatic disease. SUMMARY In this series of 150 orthotopic hepatic transplants, clinically significant gastrointes-tinal hemorrhage occurred in 34 patients (23%). Five patients (15%) survived this complication. Enteric perforations occurred p 'W'( 'SOlrX' GASTROINTESTINAL COMPLICATIONS OF HEPATIC TRANSPLANTATION 261 in 20 patients following 198 biliary-enteric procedures. Only one patient survived. Enteric perforations unrelated to biliary procedures fared only slightly better with one survivor among eight perforations. These results clearly do not warrant complacency. Modifications advocated are an aggressive diagnostic approach and early reoperation with establishment of extensive peritoneal drainage where necessary. REFERENCES l. Starzl TE. Putnam CWo Hansborough JF. et al: Surgery U1:~ 12. 1977 2. Caine RY. Williams R: Br Med J 1:471. 1977 3. Hadjiyannakis EJ. Evans DB. Smellie W AB. et al: Lancet 2:7gl. 1971 4. Lcapman SB. Vidne BA. Butt KM. et al: Ann Surg 183:266. 1976 5. Penn I. Brettschneider L. Simpson K. et al: Arch Surg 100:61. 1970 6. Penn I. Groth CG. Brettschneider L. et al: Ann Surg 168:865. 1968 7. Kocp LJ. Peters TG. Starzl TE: Abstract of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Chicago. III .• June 1978 

http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/3805/1/31735062113901.pdf

Gastrointestinal complications of hepatic transplantation

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Name not available

Name not available

D-Scholarship@Pitt