Modern empirical work in Regression Discontinuity (RD) designs often employs
local polynomial estimation and inference with a mean square error (MSE)
optimal bandwidth choice. This bandwidth yields an MSE-optimal RD treatment
effect estimator, but is by construction invalid for inference. Robust bias
corrected (RBC) inference methods are valid when using the MSE-optimal
bandwidth, but we show they yield suboptimal confidence intervals in terms of
coverage error. We establish valid coverage error expansions for RBC confidence
interval estimators and use these results to propose new inference-optimal
bandwidth choices for forming these intervals. We find that the standard
MSE-optimal bandwidth for the RD point estimator is too large when the goal is
to construct RBC confidence intervals with the smallest coverage error. We
further optimize the constant terms behind the coverage error to derive new
optimal choices for the auxiliary bandwidth required for RBC inference. Our
expansions also establish that RBC inference yields higher-order refinements
(relative to traditional undersmoothing) in the context of RD designs. Our main
results cover sharp and sharp kink RD designs under conditional
heteroskedasticity, and we discuss extensions to fuzzy and other RD designs,
clustered sampling, and pre-intervention covariates adjustments. The
theoretical findings are illustrated with a Monte Carlo experiment and an
empirical application, and the main methodological results are available in
\texttt{R} and \texttt{Stata} packages
