To test the effectiveness of process discovery algorithms, a Process
Discovery Contest (PDC) has been set up. This PDC uses a classification
approach to measure this effectiveness: The better the discovered model can
classify whether or not a new trace conforms to the event log, the better the
discovery algorithm is supposed to be. Unfortunately, even the state-of-the-art
fully-automated discovery algorithms score poorly on this classification. Even
the best of these algorithms, the Inductive Miner, scored only 147 correct
classified traces out of 200 traces on the PDC of 2017. This paper introduces
the rule-based log skeleton model, which is closely related to the Declare
constraint model, together with a way to classify traces using this model. This
classification using log skeletons is shown to score better on the PDC of 2017
than state-of-the-art discovery algorithms: 194 out of 200. As a result, one
can argue that the fully-automated algorithm to construct (or: discover) a log
skeleton from an event log outperforms existing state-of-the-art
fully-automated discovery algorithms.Comment: 16 pages with 9 figures, followed by an appendix of 14 pages with 17
figure