Also, variously referred to as: House bills; House documents; House legislative documents; legislative documents; General Court documents

Anja Eckstein (1644229)

Danila Covelli (5239256)

Filippo Biscarini (3167496)

Gina-Eva Goertz (5239271)

Giulia Masetti (5239265)

Hedda-Luise Köhling (5290715)

Jasvinder Banga (5290718)

Julian Roberto Marchesi (5290721)

Mareike Horstmann (1644232)

Marian Ludgate (5239268)

Sajad Moshkelgosha (1644214)

Salvador Diaz-Cano (5290712)

Sue Plummer (5239259)

Utta Berchner-Pfannschmidt (1644220)

Table S1. Generalized linear model (GLM) of genera counts differentially present in TSHR-immunized mice over timepoints, in reference to the baseline (T0) using EdgeR. LogFC, Log2 fold change between each timepoint and the baseline (T0); LR, likelihood ratio. Table S2. Generalized linear model (GLM) of genera counts in βgal control mice over timepoints using EdgeR. LogFC, Log2 fold change between each timepoint and the baseline (T0); LR, likelihood ratio. Table S3. Pairwise comparison of TSHR and βgal mice using Fisher’s Exact Test in EdgeR at each timepoint (T0 to T4). LogFC, Log2 fold change of βgal compared to TSHR. (XLSX 46 kb

FigShare

Additional file 4: of Gut microbiota in experimental murine model of Graves’ orbitopathy established in different environments may modulate clinical presentation of disease

Figure S1. NMDS plot based on the weighted Unifrac distances of Center2 immune and control mice including TSHR-immunized mice from Center 1. TSHR-immunized mice from Center 1 were more similar to TSHR-immunized mice from Center 2 (P = 0.2) than to the βgal (P = 0.024) than the untreated (P = 0.04). (PDF 28 kb

Additional file 6: of Gut microbiota in experimental murine model of Graves’ orbitopathy established in different environments may modulate clinical presentation of disease

Additional file 2: of Gut microbiota in experimental murine model of Graves’ orbitopathy established in different environments may modulate clinical presentation of disease

Figure S1. Temporal stability of fecal microbiota and cage effect of the immunizations. Weighted Unifrac distances of mice fecal microbial communities represented over the time course of the experiment according to the immunization (A) or the cage (B). Permutational MANOVA of weighted Unifrac distances according to timepoint, immunizations, caging, and their interactions (time × cage; time × immunization; immunization × cage) as described in Additional file 2. The time had a significant effect on the stability of the fecal microbiota (P = 0.001), in particular between the baseline (T0) and the last timepoint (T4, P = 0.003); and between the T1 and T4 (P = 0.009). The interaction between time and immunization was significant (P = 0.007). Cage was also significant, in particular the interaction cage × timepoint (P = 0.001) and cage × immunization (P = 0.002). Significant differences within the same immunization group cage has been observed (TSHR group in C4 and C5, P = 0.01). (PDF 152 kb

Additional file 5: of Gut microbiota in experimental murine model of Graves’ orbitopathy established in different environments may modulate clinical presentation of disease

https://figshare.com/articles/Additional_file_6_of_Gut_microbiota_in_experimental_murine_model_of_Graves_orbitopathy_established_in_different_environments_may_modulate_clinical_presentation_of_disease/6363074