Hassell, Richard L.

Wallace, Cindy

KnowledgeBank at OSU

CELERY CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS - 1996Richard L. Hassell- and Cindy Wallace/iHorticulture and Crop ScienceThe Ohio State UniversityandOhio Agricultural Research and Development CenterWooster, OR 44691Celery Cultivar Evaluation Trials-l996Acknowledgements .Table 1: Results Ferry-Morse and Peto SeedsTable 1: Results VTRTable 1: Results VTR (cont.) and PybasTable 1: Results Pybas (863) through Pybas (De8)Table 1: Results Pybas (picador)Table 1: Pybas (DCI x California) through 72-HUD LeachTable 2: Results Michigan Breeding LinesiPage!112345678\\jfCelel1' Culti\'ar E"aluation Trials - 1996Richard L. Hassell and Cind)1 WallaceHorticulture & Crop Science, OARDC/OSUThe celery cultivar evaluation trials were conducted at the OARDe Muck Crops Branchnear Willard, Ohio. Eighty cultivars or breeding lines were evaluated in a replicated trial, 73 inthe earl)' trial and 7 in a later trial.Transplants were gro'WIl in a pol)'-greenhouse with temperatures set at 70° days and 60°Fnights for 8 weeks. Plants were raised in Todd planter flats (O~O OA) using Metro mix 360 as agrowing media. Once the first true leaf appears, plants were fertilized on a continuous basis atthe rate of 50 ppm of a Peters 20-10-20 solution using an Anderson injector system.Growing conditions in 1996 were considered mild with a veI)' dry August. Irrigation wasapplied as needed. Plants were never considered under stress. Fusarium pressure was consideredhigh with the cultivar Florida 683 not holding up under the high pressure.ACKNOWLEDGEMEl\TTSThe 1996 Celery Cultivar Trial was sponsored jointly b)T the Ohio Vegetable and SmallFruit Research Check-Off Program and the Michigan Celery Research, Inc.All publications of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center are availableto clientele without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin,gender, age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status. 12/96-H852/200Table I. Celery Cultivar Evaluation Trials, 1996Visual I Cut I Total Wt.! Trinl Wt.! 0/0 ~rrill1 Dianleter PetioleFusariuln Fusariu III plant plant loss stalk lengthCultivar Rating Rating (kg) (kg) ( J8 in) (Inln) outside (in) COIn III entsFerry-MorseFM163-J* 1.00 1.00 3.18 2.18 31.38 106.00 10.50 Very tall, long thick petiole,slnooth ribbed, nice.FMI63-K 0.94 0.94 1.98 1.28 26.64 86.56 10.63 Not l11l1ch size, slnooth ribhedpetioles, very long.Summer Tilne 1.00 1.00 2.25 1.63 27.48 96.33 10.00 Snlooth ribbed, long petioles, lot ofsuckers.Peto SeedPeto 285 2.75 3.00 2.54 1.57 38.38 88.50 7.50 Very short ribhy celery.. no \veightor size, Iight green, suckers.PSR 14892 2.33 3.00 2.42 1.63 32.76 80.50 9.50 Long, skinny peioles, no \veight orsize.COlnet 1.67 1.00 2.33 1.58 31.59 96.33 9.67 Snlooth petioles, long and heavypetioles, lot of suckers, light green.Ponderosa 3.67 3.67 1.09 0.71 34.95 76.00 8.00 I-Iarvested, but no size or \veight,questionable future.MSU-Sf-IK5 2.67 3.33 1.71 1.25 27.82 80.33 8.00 Very ribbey celery, long andskinny stalks, lot of Slickers, nosize or weight.PSR 5114 3.5 3.50 1.20 0.95 21.21 81.00 9.00 Short, thick petioles. No size, noweight.PSR 5] 17 3.00 3.25 2.61 1.83 21.42 87.25 7.50 Very short, S11100th ribbed,no size,a lot of suckers, no weight, 110heart.PSR 5121 ---- .._-- ---- ---- __ a._ ---- -- .... Not harvested.Rocket 2.33 3.33 2.10 1.29 35.59 76.67 9.00 Very short, 511100th rihhed .. 110 si~e ..stenl cracking, brittle, lot ofstickers.Table I. Celery cultivar evaluation trials, 1996.Visual I Cut I Total Wt./ Trilll Wt./ % Trilll Diallleter PetioleF11 SariU111 FusariuI11 plant plant loss stalk lengthCultivar Rating Rating (kg) (kg) (18 in) (nlln) outside (in) COln111entsVTRVTR 1744 1.33 2.00 2.36 1.57 32.10 97.67 9.33 Llong, thick, heavy petioles, noheart, lot of suckers.VTR I:-Iyb 1914A* 1.00 2.33 2.65 1.65 37.93 103.33 11.00 Very long, skinny peioles, lot ofsuckers, ribbed celery, 2nd rep notunifonll, horizontal cracking.VTR Hyb 1914B 1.00 3.00 2.49 1.48 40.16 95.33 9.67 Ribbed celery, horizontal stenlcracking, not as good as the AfonnVTR Hyb 1916A* 1.00 1.00 2.56 1.58 35.92 101.33 10.00 Nice size, horizontal cracking.VTR I-Iyb 1916B t.OO 1.33 2.46 1.42 42.38 100.00 9.33 Lot of slickers, ribbed celery,horizontal stein cracking, not asgood as the A fornl.VTR 1917 1.00 2.33 2.28 1.43 37.28 91.00 8.67 Short, thin petioles, lot of slickers,no real size.VTR 1967 1.17 1.33 2.42 1.79 25.06 90.00 10.00 Sk inny petioles, sinoath ribbed,good resistance, petiole size 111<1ybe questionable.VTR 1977-1 4.00 Not harvestable.VTR 1977-2 4.00 Not harvestable.VTR 1979-1* 1.00 ).17 2.97 1.98 33.44 120.67 11.33 Snlooth, ribbed, nice celery, lot ofexternal suckers, very 111eatypetioles, best in this group.VTR 1979-2 1.67 1.83 2.17 1.50 30.16 94.67 8.33 Very short petioles, SI11ooth, shotribbed, lot of horizontal cracking,brittle, th ick, and flleaty.VTR 1979-3 1.00 1.00 2.30 1.61 29.96 94.67 9.33 Lot of horizontAl cracking, thicklong petioles, SI1100th ribbed, lot ofstickers, nice.Table I. Celery cultivar evaluation trials, 1996Visual I Cut I l~otal Wt./ Trin1 Wt.l % Trin1 Dialneter Petiolerusariuln Fusaril.lln plant plant loss ~talk lengthCultivar Rating Rating (kg) (kg) (18 in) (111111) outside (in) Con1111entsVTR (cont.)VTR 1979-4* 1.33 1.33 2.17 1.46 32.05 98.67 8.67 Sn100th ribbed, no size or weight,short skinny peioles, horizontalcracking, nice.VTR 1979-5 5.00 Not harvestable.VTR 1979-6 3.00 3.00 2.34 ].66 28.89 85.00 9.00 Fair size, lot of slickers, sinooth,ribbed, thick petioles, questionablelevel or resistance.VTR 1901 * 2.33 2.50 2.32 1.59 31.29 104.33 8.00 Ribbed celery, Ined length, thickIneaty, very heavy, nice size heart.PYDAS(Picador xCalifornia)961001 1.00 1.00 2.20 J.44 34.19 91.67 11.33 Long, skinny petioles, no size.961002 1.00 1.00 2.38 1.48 37.78 83.33 11.00 I..,ong, 111eaty petioles, InediuI11size, lot of suckers.961003 1.00 1.00 1.83 1.23 31.92 87.67 9.33 No size, lot of Slickers, ribbedcelery, poor third rep.961004* 1.00 1.00 2.69 1.73 35.41 93.67 )) .33 Long petioles, good size, ribbed,Jot of suckers.961005 1.00 1.00 2.08 1.37 33.27 87.67 9.67 Sinooth ribbed, horizontalcracking, good size in hearts,111ediuI11 length petioles, lot ofsuckers.961006* 1.00 1.00 2.26 I.S 1 33.46 100.67 8.33 Thick Illeaty in the heart, reallynice, great future, lot of stickers,.. _.",. .... very short.--961007* 1.00 1.17 2.06 1.44 29.27 100.00 12.00 Real long & ,neaty, ribbed celery,good size, plants are yello\vTable 1. Celery cultivar evaluation trials, 1996.Visual I Cut I Total Wt.l TrilTI Wt.l 0/0 Trinl Dianleter PetioleFl1sariuI11 FusariuI11 plant plant loss stalk lengthCultivar Rating Rating (kg) (kg) (18 in) (nlln) outside (in) COll1111entsPYBAS(863 Selection)961008* 1.17 1.33 2.47 1.71 30.37 100.67 10.33 Very brittle, long petioles, ribbed,very big.961009 1.50 1.83 2.40 1.70 29.32 101.33 10.33 Long, very nleaty, good size,SI1100th ribbed.961012* 1.00 1.33 2.92 1.67 42.92 98.67 It .33 Skinny, long ribbed, excellentheart size, nice, light green, heavy~lIckers, rep 3 ~potty fllsnrhll11.961013 1.00 1.00 2.52 2.03 20.34 106.67 12.00 '('hick, Ineaty, ribbed not l1nifornl,long petioles, grows open.961014* 1.00 1.00 2.17 9.62 28.91 97.33 11.17 Ribbed, grO\\fS open, long, notInany stickers.961015 1.00 1.33 2.30 1.64 28.77 102.67 10.67 Gro\vs open, \vide petioles, littletrinl, 111eaty.XPl66 1.00 1.00 1.98 1.35 31.85 85.00 10.00XP 266* 1.00 1.00 2.15 1.42 33.98 108.00 8.50XP 85 2.00 2.00 2.02 1.23 39.02 107.00 14.00PYBAS(UC 10 Selection)961016 3.17 4.00 2.07 1.07 48.29 104.00 10.00PYBAS(UC 8 Selection)961017 1.00 1.00 1.52 0.93 38.95 86.00 12.00 Sl11ooth, ribbed, long petioles,lacking in size.961018 1.17 2.00 2.27 1.41 36.78 90.67 11.00 Ribbed, long petioles, sillall size.. .~ ..slickers .-"Table 1. Celery cultivar evaulation trials, 1996Visual! Cut I Total Wt./ Triln Wt.l % l'riJn Dialneter PetioleFusarium Fusaritnll plant plant loss stalk lengthCultivar Rating Rating (kg) (kg) (18 in) (1111n) outside (in) COlnnlentsPYBAS(Picador)961019 1.17 1.50 2.21 1.57 28.73 99.67 10.67 Ribbed, Illediulll length, no size.961020 1.00 1.00 2.08 1.51 27.48 96.33 11.17 Ribbed, tall thick, Ineaty, goodsize.961021 1.00 1.00 2.18 1.51 30.51 91.33 12.67 Long petioles, ribbed, good size,horizontal cracking.961022 2.50 2.50 2.39 0.94 26.73 103.50 9.00 Short petioles, good 111eaty.961023 1.00 1.17 2.25 1.58 29.12 88.67 9.67 Ribbed, l11ediunl petioles, Il1ediuI11thickness, not uniforrn.961024 1.00 1.00 1.72 1.26 25.62 89.00 9.00 Very spongy, soft signs ofpuffiness, 2nd, 3rd rep poor.961025* --- --- 1.63 1.05 --- --- --- I~ibbed, sl11nll petioles, 5111allsuckers.961026 2.67 2.50 1.89 1.31 30.39 68.00 8.67 Slllooth to ribbed, Inediun1 length,thick, Ineaty.961027 2.33 2.67 2.35 1.54 32.94 98.67 9.33 Long petioles, Illedilllll, ',neaty,good size, lot of slickers, notlIll iforin.961028 1.17 1.50 2.59 1.77 31.67 115.33 10.00 Size is variable.961029* 1.00 1.00 2.57 1.37 45.79 105.00 10.67 Slnooth, ribbed, good size, longpetioles, Jot of slickers.961030 1.00 1.00 2.54 1.50 40.71 90.33 12.33 'rail petioles, very ribbed, goodsize.961031 --- --- 1.91 1.11 --- --- --- IJot of suckers, long petioles, notun i fOrl11.961032* 1.00 1.00 2.40 1.61 32.2] 97.00 9.33 Short petioles, thick, Ineaty,ribbed, good size, S0l11e bolting.89-D-M-92-1-3 1.00 1.00 w_.\ __ • 1.97 .l~26 35.83 107.00 11.00961033 3.83 5.00 --- --- --- --- ---*Considered best in the group')Fusariu111 Rating: 1= none to 5 = deadTable J. Celery cultivar evaluation trials, 1996Visual I Cut I Total Wt.! '"ril11 Wt.! % Triln Dialneter PetioleFusaritll11 FusaritJlTI plant plant loss stalk lengthCultivar l~atil1g Rating (kg) (kg) (18 in) (111111) olltside (in) COlnnlentsPYBAS(VCI x California)961034* 1.00 1.00 2.42 1.52 37.33 92.00 9.33 Short petioles, heavy centers,excellent celery, lot of slickers.961035 4.67 --- --- --- --- --- ---961036 --- --- 1.87 0.95 --- --- --- Long petioles, really tall, lot ofsuckers, sinooth ribbed, good size.961037* 1.00 1.83 2.36 J.56 32.87 99.33 8.67 Lot of suckers, short, thick, Ineaty,ribbed.961038* 1.00 1.50 2.28 1.35 39.98 89.33 10.00 t~ot of suckers, thick, 1neaty,ribbed, tnedium length.PYBAS(52-70R Selection)961039 1.00 1.00 2.32 1.32 42.36 101.33 9.33 IJot of slickers, real pithy, longpetioles, ribbed, good size.961040 1.50 1.67 2.26 1.34 40.29 92.33 8.00 Not unifonn, very short,. ribbed,no good size.951041 1.00 1.00 I 1.95 1.21 38.17 91.00 9.33 Short stalk, skinny petioles, nosize or weight, lot of suckers.72-HUD Leach 1.00 1.00 1.93 1.18 39.04 95.00 11.00Seeded: March 5, 1996Transplanted: May 15-16, 1996Harvested: August 22, 1996Salnpl~ Size: 10 stalks per row; 2 rows per rep; 4 reps per cultivarSpacing: 20 foot row length (40 plants); 30 in~~~_es bet\veen row; 6 inches between plants.Table 2. Celery cultivar evaluation trials, 1996.VIsuall Cut I rrotal Wt./ rrrilll Wt./ % l'rinl l)ialneter PetioleFusariunl Flisariunl plant plant loss stalk lengthCultivar Rating Rating (kg) (kg) (18 in) (1l1ln) outside (in) COflll1lentsMICHIGANBREEDING LINESFlorida 683 5.00 --- --- --- --- --- ---FL 1-4-1-2 2.50 3.00 2.99 1.88 36.78 90,64 7.00 Short petioles, lots of leaves, growsopen, sinooth ribbed.FL 1-4-1-7* 2.75 2.75 3.32 2.17 34.52 70.75 6.00 Nice, Fusariul11, SI1100th ribbed.FL 1-4-3-1 2.88 3.00 3.72 2.27 39.34 96.00 7.25 SI1100th ribbed.FL 1-4-5-1 3.38 3.25 2.76 1.80 34.36 85.75 7.00 Fusariul11 real bad.FL 1-4-5-3 2.50 3.50 3.73 2.28 38.58 89.98 1.75 JunkFL 1-6-1-4 3.50 4.00 2.67 1.82 27.60 95.08 8.57 JunkSeeded: May 9, 1996Transplanted: July 1, 1996I-Inrvestcd: October t t, 1996Sample: 10 stalks per row; 2 rows per rep; 4 reps per cultivarSpacing: 30 incl1es between rows; 6 inC)les between plants; 20-foot fO'V length (40 plants)*Considered best in the group.I)Fusariunl Rating: 1 = none to five = deadThis page intentionally blank.T · H · EOHIOSD\1EUNIVERSITYQ\R1][

Celery Cultivar Evaluation Trials, 1996

https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/1811/56144/1/OARDC_HCS_0659.pdf

Celery Cultivar Evaluation Trials, 1996

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

KnowledgeBank at OSU