Abma, Albert-Jan

Jellema, Jaco

Ree, Karin

Tonen, Jasper

van der Schoor, Tineke

van der Windt, Henny

Initiatives in the field of local renewable energy appear to be very successful in several countries. Because of their activities, the share of renewable energy and the involvement of citizens and civil society organizations in energy transition have increased. Examples form Denmark are well known, but also in other countries such as UK, Germany, Austria, Japan and USA these types of initiatives exist. They also lay the foundation for innovation: changes in the organization of supply, social cohesion and new technologies

Hanze UAS repository

Socio-technological innovations by energy cooperatives, a challenge  Henny van der Windt (presents), Albert-Jan Abma, Karin Ree, Jaco Jellema, Tineke van der Schoor  plus Jasper Tonen Introduction Initiatives in the field of local renewable energy appear to be very successful in several countries. Because of their activities, the share of renewable energy and the involvement of citizens and civil society organizations in energy transition have increased.  Examples form Denmark are well knoiwn, but also in other countries such as UK, Germany, Austria, Japan and USA these types of initiatives exist. They also lay the foundation for innovation: changes in the organization of supply, social cohesion and new technologies.  So. social and technological innovations are linked to each other somehow. It is unclear, however, if these local energy initiatives can play a significant role in the energy transition in the Netherlands. Many initiatives lack money, support, knowledge and other resources.  Using theories of community of practice and innovation, we try to understand what factors and actors could or should play a key role in the innovative power of these initiatives. First we compare these factors and actors with realtively long existing initiatives outside the Netherlands. Then we will have a closer loke at the Dutch initaitives.   We focus on learning ascpct within the cooperatives, the way the handle kbnowledge and the way they have impact on the surrounding world, especialy on agenda’s for technology and science developments, and on physical and societal structures.  The question is how we can understand and probably facilitate learning processes of these initiatives. And how can we scale up these initiatives of civil society organiations to the mesolevel and macrolevel of society? In other words, how to challenge existing regimes, routines and habits, i.e. regulations, policies, organization, finances, culture and technology? In this paper we focus on learning and knowledge.  Theory From Wenger’s theory of community of practice, we learn that crucial for learnbing are at least four ascpetcts:   a certain structure that ensures contiuity and interaction between the members of the community,   a common identity, visions, ideas, aims and ideals  common activities such as producing artitfacts or services, which resproduce social structures and process, cerativity and motivation  explicit space for learning and reflection From theories of innovations we learn that for sucesful innovation is needed:  fruitful intercation between three levels,  o the microlevel of inovation,  o the macrolevel of societal trends and structures and the  o intermediate level of the so-called regime of routines, incentives, rules etc. which consolidates existing systems and procedures.  activities and interaction through several lines: o governance o knowledge o market o civil society  Practices abroad Examples of energy cooperatives in Denmark, Scotland, and Germany show how personal, legal, financial-economic, organizational and technological factors sometimes slow and sometimes encourage the innovative power of these initiatives.  Apart from legal, political and economic factors as well as the availability of natural resorces such as water and natural gas, an impotrant issue is teh grow and potential of cso’s, the embdement in local systems, and the supporrt by knowledge institutions such as a university and a energy academy. Dutch situation In the Netherlands, we find almost 300 initiatives, most of them being established during the last two years. Although energy initiatives may differ considarabky in size and scope, main hurdles are: existing power of energy companies, lack of vision and support of governments, lack of urgency, lack of knowledge, lack of motivation . With respect to knowledge, at least three types of knowledge had to be sistinguished: * practical knowledge: were to buy PV, how to get finacial support, how to organize a group? * applied knowledge: were to build a windmill, how to organioze a biogas instalation * more fundamental knowledge: how to improve grid systems, how to get more efficent load capacity, how to increase efficnecy, how to change legal, social  and economic insituitibs. Some initiaves have been succesful in founcing new energy cooperatives and even energy firms. In atddition, new technologies have been invented or iproved, such as wind mill parks, biogas installations, new sharing systems, new owners suystems etc.  Energy initiatives are seen as boundary orhanisations, in which particpants learn form each other and articulate their demands for technical , scienticfi and scoial support. To do so they are embedded in all kinds of supportive institutions, initaited by NGO;s, governments and rserach institutions. Howver, because crucial actors are missing, such as market parties and central giovernment, it is unlikely that they will succesful enough to challenge ther existing regime. Conclusions - initaives as regime changers - national and local aspects - local initiatives and science and technology drivers - next steps  

Socio-technological innovations by energy cooperatives, a challenge

https://research.hanze.nl/ws/files/3199480/108.paper_copenhagen_1_.pdf

Socio-technological innovations by energy cooperatives, a challenge

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Hanze UAS repository