In this paper, a switching regime model with known sample separation
is applied to Greek data, to investigate causality linkages between tourists' satisfaction and their willingness for revisiting. The empirical evidence shows the existence of these causality effects. Moreover, it shows that the willingness for revisiting crucially depends on many qualitative aspects of tourist services and accommodation.peer-reviewe

Kompotis, Apostolos

Papanastasiou, Ioannis A.

Vassiliadis, Christos

Voyatzis, Alexandros

OAR@UM

European Research Studies Volume 7, Issue (J -2), 2004 Tourists ' Satisfaction and Revisiting: an ilJvestigation of causality effects Abstract Kompotis Apostolos, Associate Professor Papanastasiou Ioannis, Assistant Professor Vassiliadis Christos, Lecturer Voyatzis Alexandros, Associate Professor University of Macedonia* .-----In this paper, a switching regime model with known sample separation is applied to Greek data, to investigate causality linkages between tourists' satisfaction and their willingness for revisiting. The empirical evidence shows the existence of these causality effects. Moreover, it shows that the willingness for revisiting crucially depends on many qualitative aspects of tourist services and accommodation. Keywords: Switching regime models, causal ity, tourism. JEL classification: C24, C25. 1. Introduction Indisputably, tourism is an important factor of economic development for many countrieS. Thus, tourist problems have been analyzed in many stud-• Kompotis Apostolos, Associate Professor Papanastasiou Ioannis, Assistant Professor, Tel.:+ 302310891696, e-mail:papan@lIom.gr Vassiliadis Christos, Lecturer, Tel.:+ 3023l 089l58 1, e-mail: chris@uom.gr Voyatzis Alexandros, Associate Professor, Tel. :+ 30231089188+, e-mail:voyatzis@uom.gr University Of Macedonia, Social and Economical Sciences 156, Egnatia st. , P.O.Box 1591,54006, Thessaloniki, Greece 70 European Research Studies, Volume 7, Luue (1-2), 2004 ies. These problems are directly related to the particular cllaracteristics of the tourism areas. Generally, tourist areas are classified into three broad catego-ries according to their development stage. The first category includes those areas where tourism plays a dominant role in their economic base. Then, these areas are considered to be in the mature stage of their tourist develop-ment. Thus, the main problem for these areas is, at least, the maintenance of the number of nights spent by tourists through the upgrading of tourist ser-vices. The second category includes areas where tourism plays an important but not a dominant role in their economic base. The tourism industry in these areas is in the developing stage meaning that these areas . have some tourist infrastructure. Then, many people agree that the best tourist-developing strategy for these areas is the enrichment of tourist products with new ones, like conferences, cultural, archeological and religious tour.ism etc. Of course an increase in the number of tourist produc ts requires the avai lability of the necessary human, technological and material resources. Finally, in the third category belong areas where tourism has a minor impact in their economic base. These areas are now entering the tourism industry. Main strategies for tourists' attraction, in these areas, are considered to be the production of au-thentic domestic products, the preservation of the traditional way of living and the exploitation of the unique natural beauty of their environments. Regardless areas' developing stage, key issue in any tourist-developing strategy is the discovering of the factors underlying the satisfaction of visi-tors (see Vukonic, 1997, Ryon, 1997, Sirakaya, Mohellan and Uysal, 1996, Buhalis D., and Fletcher 1., 1995). Therefore, in any tourist policy it is of vital impoltance the knowledge of the factors affecting the degree of satisfaction of foreign tourists. In this pa-per, using data based on a questionnaire, we examine whether the degree of tourists' satisfaction is affected from factors which have been aggregated into four broad categories namely physical and technical characteristics of the areas as well as services and other activities offered by the particular destina·· tion places. Furthermore, an econometric model drawing from the switching regime literature is estimated to test causality effects between tourists ' satis-faction and their willingness to revisit destination areas. 2. Methodology The theoretical model draws for the switching regime literature. Letting the subscript g denote the fi rst regime under which the variable Y operates 71 Tourists' Satisfaction and Revisiting ----------------- .~--------------and ng denote the complementary regime, then each observation of the variable Y may be characterized as: if observation i belongs to g regime (1) otherwise (2) where X and ~ are appropriately and conformably dimensioned vectors of variables and parameters corresponding to the structural description of the endogenous variable Y under the two regimes. To obtain consistent estimates a two-stage estimation procedure is util-ized. The structure of the two-stage technique is characterized as: (3) otherwise (4) where y'z; is a stochastic criterion function of variables Zj and parame-ters y determing whether or not observation i belongs to regime g, so that an indicator function" I i" may be posited such that: if y'z . > e · [ - I and the i belongs to g regime 72 European Research Studies, Volume 7, Issue (J -2), 2004 =0 otherwise The vector of the coefficients y can be estimated up to a scale factor by probit methods. It is assumed that the variables t j,g ' I\ng and e j are nor-mally distributed with zero mean and covariance matrix of the form: cr g,ng 2 cr ng ( I ,) f(y'z ) It follows that E tj" e :s;; y Z = -cr ( I) = -cr w · '" I I g,e F ' g,e I ,g y Zj and in a similar way: E( I > , ) - f(Y'zJ __ tj,ng e j - y Zj - cr ng,e 1- F( y'Z i) -- cr ng,e W i. ng where fO and FO are respectively the standard normal destiny func-tion and its cumulant evaluated as its arguments (see Maddala (1983) p. 224). Thus equations (3) and (4) may be written as: Yj = Z:,g~ g - cr g,e W j,g + Uj,g for (5) = Z' f.t +cr W +U l,ngP ng ng,e l,ng l,ng otherwise (6) Tourists' Satic~faction and Revisiting 73 ------------------------ .------------------where the residuals u are implicitly related to the residuals E in equa-tions (3) and (4). The two-stage method utilizes probit analysis in the first stage and a least squares procedure in the second stage. Specifically, in the first stage probit estimates of 'Y pem1it establishing values for w 0 and W g for each i via . b n evaluation of the functions f and F . In the second stage, the equations (5) and (6) are estimated by weighted least squares since residuals u are nor necessarily homoskedastic. This procedure provides consistent estimates of the parameters. It should be pointed out that if there is no correlation between e and Eg , Eng and the variable Y does not appear in the vector Z, the switching process may be thought of as exogenous. Therefore, if the esti-mates of (j g,e and 0' ng,c are not significantly different than zero this implies that Y does not cause z and thus z may be interpreted as independent of Y . Consequently the individual regimes may be estimated as two independ-ent regression equations provided there is no restrictions across equations that need to be taken into account. 3. Data We applied our model to Greek data. Specifically, in our model the first regime refers to those tourists who have expressed their preferences for re-visiting the same place or any place in North Greece or any other place in Greece The data set is based on a questionnaire which had been distributed to almost 1900 tourists visiting northern Greece. The variables included in the questionnaire have been aggregated into four broad categories: physical and technical variables, services and activities, by taking the average of the re-sponses. Analytical description of every variable and its measurement is given in Table 1. Table 1: Variables ofthe questionnaire Aggregate Variables included in the Measurement Variable questionnaire Satisfaction o = not satisfied 1 = satisgfied L ... ~ .... J, 74 European Research Studies, Volume 7, Issue (1-2),2004 Revisiting 1 = Yes 2 = Maybe 3 =No Physical Factor Environment, Climate, 0 = 1 don't know Weather 1 Very good = Good 3 Moderate 4=Bad Technical Fac- Room accommodation, Same as above tor Quality of athletic places, Walking roads, Confer-ences' centers Services Quality of services and Same as above food, Hospitality, Relation between price and services, Queuing in banks, Clean-ing, Babysitting Activities Possibility for exercises, Same as above Activities, Entertainment, Hobbies and Aesthetics 4. Empirical Results The estimates of the empirical models related to different regimes are presented below (heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors are in paren-theses) : Model I: Revisiting the same destination place Regime 1: Revisiting ( Ij = 1 ) Y= -0.250 PH+0. 189 SR+0.l02 TH- 0.061 AC+ 1.419 WI (0.029) (0 .029) (0.024) (0.011 ) (0.061) Regime 2: No Revisiting (Ii ==: 0 ) y= 0.156 PH- 0.562 SR-·0.21 S TH+0.111 AC+1.797 W2 (0.040) (0.075) (0.048) (0.034) (0. 117) The probit estimation of the revisiting function yields: 1= - 0.237 PH+0.263 SR+O.l63 TH- 0.095 AC (0.075) (0.1 17) (0.083) (0.066) Tourists' Satisfaction and Revisiting 75 .--------------- --------------------Model II: Revisiting other place in Northern Greece Regime 1: Revisiting (Ii = 1 ) y= -0.326 PH+0.238 SR+0.151 TH-0.081 AC+ 1.569 WI (0.039) (0.038) (0.029) (0.024) (0.072) Regime 2: No Revisiting (Ii = 0) y= 0.262 PH-0.768 SR-0.296 TH+0.1 08 AC+ 1.872 W2 (0.052) (0.lO2) (0.056) (0.041) (0.125) Probits estimates of the Revisiting function: 1= -0.326 PH+0.458 SR+0.154 TH-0.081 AC (0.081) (0.126) (0.087) (0.069) Model III: Revisiting other place in Greece Regime 1: Revisiting (1=1) y= --0.151 PH+0.146 SR+ 0.168 TH+ 0.006 AC+1.823 WI (0.030) (0.037) (0.026) (0.019) (0.068) Regime 2: No Revisiting (1=0) y= -0.008 PH-0.695 SR-0.442 TH+0.007 AC+1.8I5 W2 (0.060) (0.144) (0.083) (0.061) (0.215) The probit estimates of the revisiting function are: 1= -0.104 PH+0.392 SR+0.210 TH+0.036 AC (0.089) (0.138) (0.098) (0.077) From the empirical results we conclude the following: 1. Tourists who have expressed their preferences to revisit the same place or another area in northern Greece, show similar behavior re-garding the variables affecting their satisfaction. That is, their satis-faction depends positively on the physical variable and the activities offered by the destination place. 2. Tourists willing to visit other places in Greece - except northern Greece - indicate that their satisfaction is positively linked to the physical characteristics of the destination. 3. For those! tourists who did not express any preference for revisiting, their satisfaction their satisfaction was found to depend on the ser .. vices and !the technical characteristics of the tourist areas. 4. In all cases there is a clear evidence of causality effect from satisfac-tion to decision for revisiting a tourist place. Therefore, the satisfaction of the tourists in Greece, is affected by differ-ent variables depending on whether they are likely to revisit the destination place or not. The empirical results revealed that tourists willing to revisit the .t.., ... .1 L. __ . __ J 76 European Research Studies, Volume 7, Issue (1-2), 2004 destination area derive satisfaction from physical characteristics and the various activities existing in these areas. On the contrary !the satisfaction of tourists unwilling to revisit the same place is mainly related to the services and the technical characteristics of these places. This inf~nnation based on the empirical evidence is quite important especially for those interested m clience-maintenance strategies in tourist marketing. 5. Summary In this paper we presented a general framework based on the switching regime li terature to investigate first, the existence of ca~sality effects be-tween tourists ' satisfaction and their decision for revisitil1g and second, the factors affecting tourists ' satisfaction. Using Greek data, the empirical esti-mation of the model showed the linkage between tourists ' satisfaction and their willingness to come back. Moreover this satisfa\Ction depends on whether visitors are planning to come back or not. Specifically, tourists de-cided to come back seem to derive satisfaction particularly from natural re-sources. However, for those tourists decided not to come back their satisfac-tion is mainly related to quali ty of services and the availability of accommo-dations (technical characteristics). References Buhalis D., and 1. Fletcher, 1995, "Environmental impacts on tourism desti-nations : An economic analysis. In Coccosis H. -and Nijkamp P. Sustainable tourism development . .. (England: Avebury). Maddala G.S., 1983, "Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables m Econometrics" (Cambridge University Press). Ryan C., 1997, "The tourist experience: A new introduction" (London: Cas-sell). Sirakaya E. , R.W. McLellan and M. Uysal, 1996, "Modeli,ng vacation desti-nation decisions: A behavioral approach", Journal of Travel and Tour-ism Marketing, Vo1.5 (112), 57-75. Vukonic B, 1997, "Selective Growth and Targeted destinations. In Wahab S. and Pigram 1. J.", "Tourism Development and Growth" (Routledge, London). 

Tourists’ satisfaction and revisiting : an investigation of causality effects

https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//bitstream/123456789/31442/1/Tourists_satisfaction_and_revisiting_an_investigation_of_causality_effects_2004.pdf

Tourists’ satisfaction and revisiting : an investigation of causality effects

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

OAR@UM