Safety in public urban spaces : discourses, power and possibilities to make a change

Abstract

Women experience, in a vaster extent than men, unsafety in urban public spaces. This is a structural phenomenon, based on unequal power relations. The theoretical starting-point for my thesis is that how we choose to express ourselves shape the ways we can think about and understand society. In my thesis I study depictions of safety in six of Malmö city’s action plans and guidelines towards increased safety. I analyse depictions in order to see how these documents deal with women’s fear, and how gender, ethnicity and class can be constructed or reproduced through the safety discourses. I also discuss what possibilities to accomplish change these discourses have. I do so by observing underlying connections and discrepancies between how problems, causes and actions are depicted, and by examining what power relations these discourses are based on. In my thesis I find three major directions in the safety discourse: The safe, nice and exciting city, The dangerous city and The little inside the big city. All documents studied, are written in the purpose of increasing experienced safety, but only a few acknowledge structural inequalities. Also actions tend to be of both structural and individual character. I acknowledge the importance of analysing what (problem), why (causes) and how (actions) in order to accomplish the intended changes. I recognize a repeated lack of causes, which can lead to discrepancies between worded problems and actions. Only one of the documents studied clearly express all three levels of what – why – how. All studied documents are dominated by discourses that may reproduce unequal power relations (gender, class and ethnicity). By some discourses marginalized groups are at risk to be stigmatized, since the discourses acknowledge unequal power distribution, but don’t offer any possibilities to act. My conclusions are that a more clear analysis of power is necessary to accomplish change, and that the causes of the experienced unsafety must be further examined and more clearly presented in the document, in order to evaluate the effects of the actions

    Similar works