Therapeutic drug monitoring is more cost-effective than a clinically-based approach in the management of loss of response to infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease: an observational multi-centre study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Empirical dose intensification and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) trough levels (ITL) and antibody (ATI) assays are recognised approaches for managing the loss of response (LoR) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. AIM: To compare these two interventions in a clinical setting, in terms of effectiveness and cost savings. METHODS: Consecutive IBD patients, experiencing LoR, were clinically managed according to a TDM algorithm. A historical group of empirically treated patients, for whom sera for ITL and ATI assays were collected, served as the control group. Clinical outcomes 12 weeks after the therapeutic interventions were compared between the two groups. A cost-minimization analysis was performed to compare the economic impact of these two approaches. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were enrolled prospectively and compared with 52 controls. The two cohorts were similar in characteristics and the distribution of TDM results. In the prospective cohort, however, we observed less IFX dose escalations compared with controls (45% versus 71%, p=0.003). Also, more patients were switched to a different anti-TNF\uf061 in the prospective cohort than in the control one (25% versus 4%, p=0.001). The percentages of patients achieving a clinical response at 12 weeks were 52% and 54% for the prospective and control groups, respectively. By cost analysis, we estimated a savings of 15% if the TDM algorithm was applied. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, applying a TDM algorithm for LoR to IFX resulted in less dose escalations, without loss of efficacy, compared with empirical adjustment. In addition, the TDM approach was cost-effective