PDF/A形式により利用可能アクセス:WWWによる東京外国語大学大学院総合国際学研究科博士 (学術) 論文 (2018年3月)博甲第243号参考文献: p308-310その他のタイトルは英文要旨による東京外国語大学 (Tokyo University of Foreign Studies)博士 (学術

Li, Yuxia

李, 宇霞

Japanese

Prometheus-Academic Collections

論文の英文要旨 論文題目  A Japanese-Chinese Contrastive Study of Politeness via Degree of Intimacy---from the Perspective of Discourse Politeness Theory  氏 名                   Li Yuxia     This study empirically attests the effectiveness of Brown and Levinson’s (1987) Politeness Theory and Usami’s (1998, 2001ab, 2002 etc.) Discourse Politeness Theory by investigating and comparing the politeness of Japanese (a language with honorifics system) and Chinese (a language without syntactic honorifics). According to Brown and Levinson’s theory (1987), if P (power) and Rx (rank of imposition) are constant, D (Social distance; the indicator is degree of intimacy between speakers) is a variable. The research goal of this dissertation is to reveal what influence degree of intimacy plays upon the language activities in Japanese and Chinese. This paper contains 10 chapters, and each chapter is summarized as below.  Chapter 1 introduces the theoretical framework of this research. It also presents and explains the argument and the construct of this research.     Chapter 2 introduces the theoretical framework based on the history of the Politeness Theory.  Chapter 3 explains the data collecting methods for this research. Based on Usami’s (2008b) “comprehensive conversation analysis”, an empirical study method, this study elicits condition-controlled conversation data from both Japanese and Chinese. 12 pairs of Japanese Women’s conversation data are collected (Respectively 6 pairs from First-meeting-group and Friend-group), meanwhile, 24 pairs of Chinese Women/Men conversation data are also collected (Respectively, 6 pairs from Women’s and Men’s First-meeting-group and Friend-group). Totally 720-minutes long, 36 pairs conversation data are recorded. This study uses Usami ed. (2013)’s corpus data of Japanese Men’s conversation (First-meeting-group and Friend-group) to compare with the data of Chinese Men’s conversation.  Chapter 4 to Chapter 5 analyzes speech level in Japanese conversation and honorific words in Chinese conversation.     Chapter 4 analyzes the sentence-final speech level in Japanese conversation. It indicates that speakers make consideration to the hearer by adjusting psychological distance and treatment. Japanese first-meeting group’s sentences basically end by“DESU/MASU” style (P).  Whereas Japanese Friend-group’s sentences basically end by normal style (N). Taking this result and conversation themes into consideration, Japanese women express intimacy by decreasing sentence-final courtesy. Japanese men express intimacy by selecting intimate topics such as their girlfriends.  Chapter 4 studies speech level shift. Down shift in Japanese first-meeting women’s conversation is used mostly as “admiration, impression”, and used mostly as “suspended speech” by men. Up shift in Japanese conversation among friends is used mostly as “confirmation”, mainly using “DESHOU”.  Chapter 5 describes honorific words in Chinese conversation. Chinese mostly use neutral words (P) in their first meeting conversation. Chinese men in first-meeting group seem to be more familiar with each other than their women counterparts. Basically, Chinese women pairing with friends also use neutral words (P). The abusive words occur in every 6 conversations. Based on Usami(1998, 2001ab, 2002 etc.) Discourse Politeness Theory, these abusive words used by Chinese men among friends, can be interpreted as a shibboleth and positive politeness strategy.  Chapter 6 and 7 examine “How to keep the conversation going”, with a focus on conversation topics and topic introduction. Chapter 7 analyzes the typical pattern of topic change in Japanese and Chinese in the case of first-meeting. Japanese’s typical conversation pattern is greeting, exchange of personal information (name, faculty, major, grade), reason of cooperation for this conversation recording, and other topics. Chinese’s typical pattern is exchange of personal information (faculty, grade, major, hometown), reason of cooperation for this conversation recording, and other topics. There are no greeting nor exchange of name information in Chinese conversation.  Chapter 7 describes how to introduce topics. The dissertation hypothesizes that those who first meet would introduce new topics by questioning, and those who are friends would introduce new topics by declarative sentences. The results show that, Japanese conversation data support the above hypothesis; Chinese conversation, however, does not support it. Instead, Chinese women friends use exclamatory sentences, and only Chinese men first-meeting group shows a little tendency.  Chapter 8 focuses on the listener, and studies the responses of the listener. First meeting group  use more responsive expressions than friend group, no matter they are Japanese group or Chinese one. Japanese conversation contains more responses than Chinese one. The most frequent response word in Japanese friend’s conversation is “UN” group, the second is “SOU” group, and the third is “AA” group. The most frequent response word in Chinese friends’ conversation is “en” group, the second is “dui” group, and the third is “a” group. Japanese and Chinese tend to use similar sound as response words.  Chapter 9 answers the research questions and summarizes the research findings of this research, Japanese-Chinese contrastive study of politeness, via degree of intimacy, from three aspects: the speech level in Japanese conversation and honorific words in Chinese conversation; the ways of introducing topics in Japanese and Chinese conversation; and the use of responses in conversation.   Chapter 10 explains the relevance between this study and Usami’s (1998, 2001ab, 2002 etc.) Discourse Politeness Theory and indicates research directions for future study.  

A Japanese-Chinese contrastive study of politeness via degree of intimacy : from the perspective of discourse politeness theory

http://repository.tufs.ac.jp/bitstream/10108/91868/1/dt-ko-0243.pdf

A Japanese-Chinese contrastive study of politeness via degree of intimacy : from the perspective of discourse politeness theory

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Prometheus-Academic Collections