Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Pembatalan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di Pengadilan Negeri (Studi Putusan Nomor : 293/Pdt.G/BPSK/2014/PN.Bks, 72/Pdt.G.BPSK/2010/PN.Yk, 16/Pdt.Sus.BPSK/2014/PN.Grt)

Abstract

Consumer dispute resolution is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board mandated by Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. This study discusses about the decision of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency, such us DKI Jakarta, Bantul, and Tasikmalaya which is not approved by the Businessman and then submitted a cancellation to State Court Bekasi, Yogyakarta, and Garut. The three of District Court Judges overturned the decision of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board, with the consideration that BPSK is not authorized to resolve consumer disputes. That means, the considerations of the three District Court Judges do not take into account the provisions contained in Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade No. 350 / MPP / Kep / 12/2001 on the Implementation of Duties and Powers of Consumer Dispute Settlement Bodies, as well as opinions from AZ Nasution related to Consumer Dispute. there is one District Court Judge who has the right consideration to 2 categories of consumer disputes, namely Garut District Court in decision number 16 / Pdt.Sus.BPSK / 2014 / PN.Grt