Ryan C. Hendrickson examines the chain of events leading to Operation Deliberate Force, NATO’s first air campaign in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and their significance ten years on

Hendrickson, Ryan C.

English

The Keep

Crossing the Rubicon

Eastern Illinois University

Eastern Illinois UniversityThe KeepFaculty Research and Creative Activity Political ScienceOctober 2005Crossing the RubiconRyan C. HendricksonEastern Illinois University, rchendrickson@eiu.eduFollow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/polisci_facPart of the Political Science CommonsThis Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research andCreative Activity by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact tabruns@eiu.edu.Recommended CitationHendrickson, Ryan C., "Crossing the Rubicon" (2005). Faculty Research and Creative Activity. 4.http://thekeep.eiu.edu/polisci_fac/4Crossing the ..,ubicon Ryan C. Hendrickson examines the chain of events leading to Operation Deliberate Force, NATO's first air campaign In Bosnia and Herzegovina, and their significance ten years on. Earty in the morning of 30 Augus11995 NATO airaalt launched a series of precision slrfkes agains1 seleaed 1argets in Serb-held Bosnia and Herzegovina. This heralded the s1artofOperation Deliberate Foroe, NATO's firs! air campaign, !ha! lasted for two-and-a-half weeks, shattered Bosnian Serb communications and effectively ended !he ·out-of-area· debale Iha! had dominated intra-Alliance discussions on NATO's role since !he end of !he Cold War. Allhough extremely controversial at the time, a decade on it is clear !hat Operation Deliberate Force and !he judicious use of air power was critical to bringing !he Bosnian War to an end wllh enormous political consequences and obvious benefits for Bosnia and ProgrNa rtp0t1: A<lmr .. Leighton W. Smth, ~of Alt,ea- F«ees SoutNm EUtCPt. P'QVi<iM an update on Optt111•on Deltoetat• Foree, NATO's fit1 t w caT01tQ1"1 (0 AFSOUTH) Herzegovina. In addlbon, !hough subsequently overshadowed by Operation Allied Force, the Alliance's much longer air campaign In Kosovo in 1999, Operation Deliberate Force may have contributed more to NATO's posl-Cold War transformation than any other single event In spite of Bosnia and Herzegovina's eventual imporlance to NATO, the Alliance was slow to join international el\'orts to end fighting In the former Yugoslavia. When violence erupted in 1991, first the European Community and then the United Nations took the lead In seeking to halt the conftlct and restore peace and s1ability. At the time, the United States had just led a UN-approved coalition to drive Saddam Hussein's Iraq out of Kuwait and there was great optimism about !he United Nations' potential to promote a •new wortd order". The Bosnian War proved an extremely sobering experience for !he United Nations and all International Institutions that became Involved in negotiations to end the connlct. The UN Protection Force (UNPROFOR), which eventually grew to 38 000 troops, was tasked with delivering humanitarian assistance to those in need and providing ·safe areas" In which civilians should not be harmed. Bui it was expected to remain politically neutral and was not mandated to enforce a particular settlement. since no settlement had been agreed. The phrase !hat encapsulated UNPROFOR's predicament at !he time was !hat !he Unl1ed Nations· blue berets were ·peacekeepers with no peace to keep". While UNPROFOR struggled to achieve its objectives, NATO was Itself seeking to come to terms with the end of the Cold war. In 1991 at their Rome Summit. NATO heads of siate and government agreed to a New Strategic Concept, enabling the Alliance to go beyond collective defence and to conduct new security missions, lnduding peacekeeping, conftla-prevention and crisls-managemen1 activities. In this way, in 1994 and the first half of 1995, NATO used foroe In limited slrfkes agains1 Bosnian Serb milllary targets In response to violations of various UN Security Council Resolutions. Under the military guidance of Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, General George Joulwan, the Alliance also helped police a UN arms embargo against the whole of the former Yugoslavia and economic sanctions against Serbia and Mon1enegro. NATO's early forays Into Bosnia and Herzegovina failed to change the political realities on the ground and prompted many analysts to question !he Alliance's relevance In the post-Cold War security environment. Many perceived NATO's role In the Balkans as especially troubling, given !he extent of the humani1arian suffering taking place In what was after ell NATO's backyard. In an oft-repeated refrain, bolh NATO supporters and NATO critics argued that the Alliance would have to go ·out of area· or ii would go ·out of business·. As international media maintained blanket coverage of the conflic~ dissatisfaction grew with the international community's piecemeal and inadequate response. Although most UNPROFOR soldiers served with distinction and 167 lost their lives in the course of the mission, UNPROFOR's inability to influence the dynamics of the conflict enabled the Bosnian Serbs to make a mockery of the UN mission. Indeed, both NATO Secretary General Willy Claes and his predecessor Manfred Worner became Increasingly outspoken about the United Nations' Inability to end the crisis and the need for NATO to take on a greater role. Despite this, the Allies themselves were unable to build the necessary political consensus for a more robust approach during 1994 and the first half of 1995 and continued to debate the most appropriate course of action. NATO's inertia was, in part, a reflection of UNPROFOR's composition. Many Allies including Canada, France and the United Kingdom, had deployed their own peacekeepers in UNPROFOR and feared that a more robust approach towards the Bosnian Serbs would produce a backlash against their troops. Meanwhile, the United States, which did not have troops on the ground, was pushing a "lift and strike· policy- lifting the arms embargo against the entire region that penalised in particular the Bosnian Muslims and striking the Bosnian Serb targets from the air. To be sure, US diplomatic pressure for change remained cautious. The deaths of 18 US Army Rangers in an ambush In October 1993 in Mogadishu, Somalia, which effectively ended the UN peacekeeping mission to Somalia, continued to cast a long shadow over policy-making. Senior US officials and Pentagon planners had no intention of becoming engaged in another poorly planned operation risking combat casualties where clear national security Interests were not at stake. Moreover, CIA analysts estimated that it would take thousands of ground troops to restore the peace. The turning point was the Srebrenlca massacre of mid-July 1995. The single greatest atrocity of the Wars of Yugoslavia's Dissolution that resulted in the deaths of close to 8000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys, shocked world opinion and galvanised Washington to steer NATO in a new direction. In US President Bill Clinton's White House, National Security Advisor Anthony Lake, who according to lvo Oaalder's Getting ro Dayton: The Making of America's Bosnia Policy (Brookings Institution Press, 2000) had long advocated a more robust approach, took the lead in pushing the Allies in a new direction. The United States was not alone in urging a new, more robust Allied approach to the Bosnian War. Attitudes towards the Bosnian Serbs had been hardening even before the Srebrenica massacre especially after UN peacekeepers, many of whom were French, were taken hostage In May 1995. In this way, French President Jacques Chirac was equally vocal about the need for a radically new and more interventionist policy. One critical policy change introduced in early August 1995 was a reworking of the "dual-key' arrangement, which had been established in 1993 to govern the use of force by NATO. The arrangement required that NATO military action be approved by both UN and NATOofliclals. Until August 1995, Yasushi Akashi, the UN Secretary-General's Special Representative in Yugoslavia, held the United Nations' key. After Srebenica, Akashi's key was given to UNPROFOR's military commander, French General Bernard Janvier. The NATO key was held by Admiral Leighton W. Smith, Commander of Allied Forces Southern Europe In Naples. The event that triggered Operation Deliberate Force took place on 28 August 1995, when a Serb mortar fell upon a market place in Sarajevo, killing 38 civilians and injuring 85 others. With General Janvier away at that time, British Lieutenant-General Rupert Smith turned the UN key in coordination with Admiral Smith, indicating that the Bosnian Serbs had yet again violated a UN Security Council Resolution and that this time NATO would respond with force. Operation Deliberate Force was launched as soon as the last UNPROFOR troops left Bosnian Serb territory. The bombing was briefly interrupted due to a cease-fire negotiated by General Janvier on 1 September, but it resumed in the early hours of 5 September. Almost all the then 16 NATO Allies contributed in some way to the The judicious use of air power was critical to bringing the Bosnian War to an end campaign, which Involved a total of 3515 sorties and the dropping of 1026 bombs at 338 individual targets. There were no NATO casualties, though a French Mirage 200K was shot down on the first day of the campaign and the crew captured by the Bosnian Serbs. Among the many Individuals Involved In Operation Deliberate Force, NATO Secretary General Willy Claes played an especially inftuential role behind the scenes. Although Claes· personal political problems In Belgium have cast a shadow over his legacy and obliged him to leave NATO after less than a year and a half in office. he can take much credit for ensuring that the Alliance saw Deliberate Force through to a successful coneluslon . In his short period as NATO Secretary General, Claes showed himself to be a determined leader who was prepared to keep the Norlll Allan tic Council In session ror hours until consensus could be reached, especially in the 1ead-0p to Deliberate Force. According to Richard Holbrooke's account In To End A war(Random House, 1998), Claes also aclively supported both of the Smiths when the keys were wmed, allowing the air campaign to proceed without additional debate from the Allies. When General Janvier negotiated a temporary cease-fire with Bosnian Sertl military commanders, Claes placed considerable diplomatic pressure on him, other UN officials and the Norlll AUantic Council to resume the air strikes, arguing that NATO had to demonstrate greater resolve to Change attitudes on the ground. Claes' relationship with General Joulwan was also Important to the success or the air campaign. When General Joulwan requested political support to use Tomahawk missiles against Bosnian Serb military positions In Banja Luka, Claes backed him. The use of the Tomahawks In the early morning hours of 10 September generated some criticism, even among NATO Ambassadors, but today Is considered by military analysts such as Colonel Robert c . Owen In Oellberate Force: A Case Study in Effec~ve Air Campaigning (Air University Press, 2000) to have been significant in demonstrating NATO's resolve and therefore likely to have helped bring the conftict to an end. In the wake or Operabon Deliberate Force. the Bosnian Sertls round It Increasingly difficult to retain territory they had held since the earty months of the Bosnian War In the lace of a concerted ollenslve lnvoMng Croatian as well as Bosnian Croat and Bosnian Muslim forces. As a result they were more willing to negotiate an end to the war In talks that got under way in Dayton, Ohio, on 1 November than they had been ea~ier in the conftlct In ellect Operation Deliberate Force helped pave the way for the Dayton Peace Agreement which succeeded in establishing the governing framework for Bosnia and Herzegovina that remains In place to this day. Almost a decade since It came Into force, the Dayton Peace Agreement has not managed to resolve Bosnia and Herzegovina's conftict and the peace process Is yet to become self-sustaining. More than 7000 troops, most of them deployed since December 2004 under the European Union's auspices, remain In the country and international administrators continue to play an Intrusive role In Bosnian political life, frequently overruling local officials. Nevertheless. the Dayton Peace Agreement succeeded in ending Europe's bloodiest conftict since the Second World War. which had taken more than 100 000 lives during the previous four years. And It gave Bosnians the opportunity to rebuild their country and with It a better future for themselves. Operation Deliberate Force also helped restore the credibility of both NATO and the wider international community. By Intervening militarily in Bosnia and Herzegovina the Alliance had moved definibvely out or area, that Is beyond Allied territory. Moreover. NATO demonstrated that it was capable both of overseeing a successful multinational military campaign and of using rorce to achieve non-Artide 5 objedives, that is objedives other than colledive defence. Under the terms of the Dayton Peace Agreement NATO became Involved In peacekeeping for the firsttlme. The Alliance led a 60 ODO-strong Implementation Force or IFOR to oversee implementation of the accord's military aspects and ensure that the country did not slide back into war. Moreover, the Bosnian deployment generated a series or additional benefits, including, for example, the Integration of some 2000 Russian troops and officers Into NA TO-ied structures. In a move that had seemed Impossible only five years earlier, these soldiers worked side by side with their NATO peers for the next seven years. Operation Deliberate Force also heralded a much wider NATO engagement in and commitment to the Balkans. In 1999, NATO again successfully used force against Slobodan Milosevic and his military forces with a 78-<lay air campaign to halt ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. That campaign was followed by the creation and deployment of another NATO-led peaceKeeping mission, the Kosovo Force or KFOR, which remains deployed today. And in 2001, NATO intervened in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia• in a preventive capacity to head off another war and restore peace and stability to the region. Although it tooK the Allies far too long to develop the necessary political consensus to intervene effectively in Bosnia and Herzegovina, once the Alliance decided to confront the causes of the conftict. it succeeded In rapidly ending the violence and then in developing the means to build peace. In this way, Operation Deliberate Force ushered In a new era for NATO, helping set the foundation for the much larger range of non-Article 5 missions that the Alliance is involved in today, and moving NATO way beyond the sole maintenance of its own collective defence. Ryan C. Hendrickson Is associate professor of po/i~cal science at Eastem Illinois University and author of the forthcoming book, "Diplomacy and War at NATO: The Secretary General and Military Ac~on After the Cold War" (University of Missouri Press). 

Hendrickson, Ryan

https://thekeep.eiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&amp;context=polisci_fac

Crossing the Rubicon

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

The Keep

Eastern Illinois University

Eastern Illinois University