David, Carmen L.

Flores, Hauke

Lange, Benjamin

English

Electronic Publication Information Center

Variability of under-ice and open water communities  in the Central Arctic Ocean C.L.David1,  B.Lange1,  H.Flores1 1Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany Contact: carmen.david@awi.de Arctic sea ice ecosystems thrive significantly on carbon produced by ice-associated microalgae (Gosselin, 1997). Species feeding in the ice-water interface layer probably play a key role in transferring carbon from sea ice into pelagic food webs (Flores, 2011). The significance of this trophic carbon flux, however, is poorly known. This is because until very recently it was difficult to sample the under-ice community at the relevant spatial scales due to the inaccessibility of the ice underside to quantitative macrofauna sampling. Furthermore, estimating the relationship of key species with properties of their sea ice habitat is important to understand future changes of the Arctic sea ice system. Materials and Methods Introduction Preliminary results Conclusions A major objective of the HGF Young Investigators Group Iceflux was to investigate the relationship of the under-ice community with physical habitat properties in Central Arctic Ocean during RV Polarstern cruise ARK XXVII/3. Under-ice fauna was sampled at 15 stations with a Surface and Under-Ice Trawl (SUIT; van Franeker et al. 2009). The SUIT consists of a sideward-shearing steel frame equipped with floaters enabling the net to glide in close contact with the underside of sea ice. The frame was equipped with two parallel nets attached next to each other in the mouth opening of 2.01 m height: A shrimp net (7 mm half-mesh) covering 1.54 m of the opening, and a zooplankton net (0.3 mm mesh) covering 0.42 m of the opening. A bio-environmental sensor array was mounted in the SUIT frame, consisting of an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler, a CTD probe with built-in fluorometer and altimeter, two spectral radiometers, and a video camera.  Hereafter, results of hauls 1-12 are presented.  The first trawl survey of under-ice fauna in the Arctic Ocean provided a geographically unique dataset.   A rich and diverse under-ice community appears to be present virtually throughout the eastern Arctic deep-sea basins.  Polar cod and ice-associated amphipod A.glacialis represent key species of the under-ice habitat.  Under-ice swarms of gelatinous ctenophores suggest an important role , but underestimated in total carbon fluxes.  The association of this community with the under-ice habitat indicates a possibly important role of ice algal production in the Arctic ecosystem. Fig.1  Surface and Under-Ice Trawl in Arctic Ocean (SUIT; van Franeker et al. 2009)  (a) SUIT frame and nets scheme;  (b) birds-eye-view of SUIT during operational mode;  (c) photo of SUIT in the water Beroe cucumis Clione limacina Apherusa glacialis Themisto libellula Fig.3 Hierarchical Classification of ARK27/3 stations based on their species composition and abundance; Euclidean distance and Ward method were used; black square groups under-ice stations, red open water stations and green the unique station Fig.4  Polar cod abundance (ind.100 m-2) in ARK27/3 stations Fig.5  Polar cod size distribution; size classes range from 50mm to 144mm at 5mm intervals References • van Franeker J.A., Flores H., van Dorssen M., 2009.  The Surface and Under-Ice Trawl (SUIT) • Flores  H, 2009. Frozen desert. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen • Gosselin M., Levasseur M., Wheeler P.A., Horner R.A., Booth B.C., 1997. New measurements of phytoplankton and ice algal production in the Arctic Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part II  Acknowledgments •Jan-Andries van Franeker & IMARES •Michael van Dorssen •Andre  Meijboom Fig.6  Principal Component Analysis on representative species in ARK27/3 samples and physical parameters describing the habitats; Variables map presented as correlation circle with the first two dimensions 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 204 216 223 248 258 276 285 321 331 332 345 Macrofauna composition  species number in stations range from 2 to 13, from a total of 15 identified  cumulated abundances in stations range from 0.2ind.m-2 to 2.1ind.m-2 (Fig.2) Community types  under-ice community characterised by the dominance of the sympagic amphipod A.glacialis and polar cod  open water community characterised by dominance of the amphipod T.libellula  unique species assemblage characterised by the presence of appendicularians,  chaetognates, and the gastropod L.helicina (Fig.3)  commonly found species were C.limacina and B.cucumis, ctenophores present in high number in stations 248 and 331 Polar cod  abundance range from 0.2 in open-water stations to 1.9 ind.m-2 in under-ice stations (Fig.4)  size spectra shows presence of three cohorts: juvenils, first year and second year fish (Fig.5)  qualitative diet investigation indicated mainly A.glacialis and in lower proportion T.libellula and Calanus spp Ecosystem variability in ARK27/3 stations  Association of sea ice properties with sympagic amphipods and polar cod are inversely correlated with association of water temperature and the amphipod T.libellula  B.saida and O.glacialis are inversely correlated with salinity (Fig.6) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 a) c) b) Fig.2  Macrofauna abundance in ARK27/3 stations (black label for under-ice stations, red label for open water stations) caught with the SUIT shrimp net;   Sea ice extents are courtesy of NSIDC 2 ind.m-2 0.2 ind.m-2 216 204 233 223 248 258 345 276 332 321 331 285 Crustacea Ctenophora Gastropoda Eukrohniidae Beroe cucumis Apherusa glacialis Themisto libellula Onisimus glacialis Boreogadus saida Eusirus holmii 

Variability of under-ice and open water communities in the central Arctic Ocean

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Electronic Publication Information Center