Alpha-based performance evaluation may fail to capture correlated residuals
due to model errors. This paper proposes using the Generalized Information
Ratio (GIR) to measure performance under misspecified benchmarks. Motivated by
the theoretical link between abnormal returns and residual covariance matrix,
GIR is derived as alphas scaled by the inverse square root of residual
covariance matrix. GIR nests alphas and Information Ratio as special cases,
depending on the amount of information used in the residual covariance matrix.
We show that GIR is robust to various degrees of model misspecification and
produces stable out-of-sample returns. Incorporating residual correlations
leads to substantial gains that alleviate model error concerns of active
management.Comment: 47 pages, 1 figure, 6 table