Reactions of CO<sub>2</sub> and CS<sub>2</sub> with [RuH(η<sup>2</sup>‑CH<sub>2</sub>PMe<sub>2</sub>)(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]

Abstract

Carbon disulfide reacted with the cyclometalated ruthenium complex [RuH­(η<sup>2</sup>-CH<sub>2</sub>PMe<sub>2</sub>)­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] (<b>1</b>) at low temperature to yield the dithioformate complex [Ru­(η<sup>1</sup>-SC­(S)­H)­(η<sup>2</sup>-CH<sub>2</sub>PMe<sub>2</sub>)­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] (<b>4</b>), where the CS<sub>2</sub> inserts into the metal hydride bond. On warming, complex <b>4</b> rearranges to give the known complex [Ru­(S<sub>2</sub>CHPMe<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>-κ<sup>3</sup><i>S</i>,<i>S</i>,<i>C</i>)­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] (<b>3</b>), where the CS<sub>2</sub> is inserted in a metal phosphorus bond. Further reaction of this complex with excess CS<sub>2</sub> over a period of days resulted in insertion of a second CS<sub>2</sub> unit into one Ru–S bond to yield [Ru­(SC­(S)­SCH­(-S)­PMe<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>-κ<sup>3</sup><i>S</i>,<i>S</i>,<i>C</i>)­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] (<b>5</b>). Complex <b>5</b> was characterized crystallographically and by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. In contrast, reaction of [RuH­(η<sup>2</sup>-CH<sub>2</sub>PMe<sub>2</sub>)­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] (<b>1</b>) with CO<sub>2</sub> resulted in insertion of CO<sub>2</sub> into the Ru–C bond to give [RuH­(OC­(O)­CH<sub>2</sub>PMe<sub>2</sub>-κ<sup>2</sup><i>O</i>,<i>P</i>)­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] (<b>2</b>). Low-temperature NMR spectroscopic studies did not show any evidence for prior formation of a formate complex

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions