This thesis discusses Juridical Review on Human Resources Dispute in Decision of Jakarta State Administrative Court (Study on Decision Number: 237 / G / 2015 / PTUN-JKT). From the results of this thesis research obtained the basic conclusion In Dispute In Case Number: 237 / G / 2015 / PTUN-JKT. Mangasi Situmeang, S.H., LLM Plaintiff Against the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia as Defendant. The Object of Disputes in Case Number: 237 / G / 2015 / PTUN-JKT This Is The Decree of Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Number: KEP-IV-551 / C / 08/2015 Date 12 August 2015. Application of Legal Provisions In Case Number : 237 / G / 2015 / PTUN-JKT is the Authority of the State Administrative Court Jakarta In Case Number: 237 / G / 2015 / PTUN-JKT. Based on Article 1 point 9 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 51 Year 2009 Concerning the Second Amendment to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 Year 1986 concerning State Administrative Court defines Decision of State Administration is: Decision of State Administration is a written stipulation issued by a state administrative body or officer containing legal action in accordance with applicable, concrete, individual, and final legal rules, which bring legal consequences for a person or a civil legal entity " . And Breaking the Good General Principles of Good Governance, the Issuance of Disputed Objects, brother of Mangasi Situmeang, SH, LLM objected to the actions of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, which has issued the Attorney General\u27s Decree No. KEP-IV-551 / C / 08/2015 dated August 12, 2015. The acts of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia violate the Good Governance Principles (AAUPB) especially the Principle of Accuracy and Accuracy in issuing a State Administrative Decision. This is as regulated in Article 10 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 Year 2014 About Government Administration. With the Consideration of the Panel of Judges in Deciding the Case Number 237 / G / 2015 / PTUN-JKT stating the Defendants Exception Not Received (niet ont van kelijk verklaard). To grant the claim of the Plaintiff to the whole, to declare that the Decree of the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Indonesia Number: KEP¬IV551 / C / 08/2015 dated August 12, 2015, special serial number 41, on behalf of the Plaintiff, requires the Defendant to revoke the State Administrative Decision In accordance with the Decision Letter of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia No. KEP-IV-551 / C / 08/2015 dated August 12, 2015, special serial number 41, on behalf of the Plaintiff, requires the Defendant to rehabilitate, restore the dignity and status of the Plaintiff as the Chief Prosecutor Country type A in the Provincial Capital, based on applicable laws and regulations. As well as Punishing the Defendant to pay the case fee incurred in this dispute amounting to Rp. 300.000, - (three hundred thousand rupiah)
