Exploring the Variable Hapticity of the Arylamide Ligand: Access to σ‑Amidophenyl and π‑Cyclohexadienylimine Structures

Abstract

A study of the preference for σ vs π coordination of the arylamido ligand to a late transition metal shows that LiNPh<sub>2</sub> reacts with RuHCl­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (<b>1</b>) to yield the bent-seat piano-stool complex RuH­[(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)­NPh]­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>2a</b>) but with RuHCl­(CO)­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (<b>3</b>) to yield the σ-amide RuH­(η<sup>1</sup>-NPh<sub>2</sub>)­(CO)­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>4</b>). The stability of the σ-bound NPh<sub>2</sub> ligand in <b>4</b> reflects the π acidity of the CO ligand, which inhibits PPh<sub>3</sub> loss. Carbonylation of <b>2a</b> at 50 °C affords Ru­(CO)<sub>3</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>8</b>) and HNPh<sub>2</sub>, suggesting sequential π → σ isomerization and reductive elimination. The phenoxide ligand behaves similarly: RuH­(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>O)­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>2b</b>) is formed from <b>1</b> but RuH­(η<sup>1</sup>-OPh)­(CO)­(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (<b>5</b>) is formed from <b>3</b>, and carbonylation of <b>2b</b> gives <b>8</b> and phenol, although more forcing conditions are required (90 °C). The crystal structure of <b>2a</b> is reported

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions