In complexes of the type [(NC)2HgIINCFeII(CN)5]4- which are formed in aqueous mixtures of Hg(CN)2 and [Fe(CN)6]4- both metals are weakly coupled. Optical metal to metal charge transfer (MMCT) excitation from FeII to HgII leads to the reduction of HgII to Hg0 and the oxidation of
[Fe(CN)6]4- to [Fe(CN)6]3-. In the complex [(NC)5CoI-HgII-CoI(CN)5]6- the metals are strongly coupled by direct but polar metal metal bonds. MMCT (CoI -> HgII) excitation induces the photoredox reaction: [HgCo2(CN)10]6- -> Hg0 + 2[Co(CN)5]3-

Kunkely, Horst

Stochel, G.

Vogler, Arnd

English

University of Regensburg Publication Server

Photoredox Reactions of Hg(CN)₂/[Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ and [HgCo₂(CN)₁o]⁶⁻ induced by Inner-Sphere Metal to Metal Charge Transfer Excitation

Photoredox Reactions of Hg(CN)2/[Fe(CN)6]4" and [HgCo2(CN)10]6" Induced by Inner-Sphere Metal to Metal Charge Transfer Excitation H . Kunkely, G . Stochel*, and A . Vogler* Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Universität Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, D-8400 Regensburg, FRG Z. Naturforsch. 4 4 b , 145-148 (1989); received November 22, 1988 Cyano Complexes of Mercury(II), Iron(II), Cobalt(I), UV Spectra, Photochemistry In complexes of the type [(NC)2Hg I INCFe I I(CN)5]4 _ which are formed in aqueous mixtures of Hg(CN)2 and [Fe(CN)6]4~ both metals are weakly coupled. Optical metal to metal charge transfer (MMCT) excitation from Fe" to Hg n leads to the reduction of Hg1 1 to Hg° an the oxidation of [Fe(CN)6]4- to [Fe(CN)6]3~. In the complex [(NC) 5Co I-Hg I I-Co I(CN) 5] 6- the metals are strongly coupled by direct but polar metal metal bonds. MMCT (Co^Hg 1 1 ) excitation induces the photo-redox reaction: [HgCo 2 (CN) 1 0 ] 6 --»Hg° + 2[Co(CN)5]3~. Introduction Polynuclear transition metal complexes which con-tain reducing and oxidizing metal centers are charac-terized by optical metal to metal charge transfer (MMCT) transitions [1-8]. Two different cases can be distinguished. The interaction of the reducing and oxidizing metal may be facilitated by bridging ligands ( M r e d — L — M o x ) [1—8]. The electronic coupling of both metals may be very weak. Photoredox reactions induced by such M M C T transitions are well known [8,9]. In addition, the reducing and oxidizing metal of heteronuclear complexes can be connected by a direct metal—metal bond which provides a very strong coupling of the metals. Since the interacting metal orbitals have different energies in this case the metal—metal bond has a certain degree of polarity and M M C T transitions can occur. The extent of C T contribution to such a transition de-pends on the polarity of the metal-metal bond. Photoredox reactions induced by this type of inner-sphere M M C T excitation have been discussed only recently [10,11]. In the present study we describe photoredox reactions initiated by both types of M M C T transitions. While in the system Hg n (CN) 2 / [Fe n(CN) 6] 4~ the interaction between Hg" and Fe 1 1 takes place via bridging cyanide the complex [ ( N C ) 5 C o I - H g I I - C o I ( C N ) 5 ] 6 - contains polar ftg-fco bonds. In both cases inner-sphere M M C T (Fe11 or Co 1 to Hg 1 1) excitation is associated with a redox photolysis. * Permanent address: Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Chemistry, 30-060 Krakow, Karasia 3, Poland. * Reprint requests to A. Vogler. Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, D-7400 Tübingen 0932-0776/89/0200-0145/$ 01.00/0 Experimental Section Materials. The compounds K 4 [Fe(CN) 6 ]x3Hg(CN) 2 x4H 2 0 [12] and K 6 [HgCo 2 (CN) 1 0 ] [13] were prepared according to published procedures. The electronic absorption spectrum of the latter complex agreed well with that reported previously [13]. Photolyses. The light source was a Hanovia 977 B-1 (1 kW) lamp. The mercury lines at 313 and 366 nm were selected by a Schoeffel monochromator G M 250/1. Solutions of the complexes were photo-lyzed in 1 cm spectrophotometer cells at room tem-perature. For quantum yield determinations the complex concentrations were such as to have essen-tially complete light absorption. The total amount of photolysis was limited to less than 5% to avoid light absorption by the photoproducts. Absorbed light in-tensities were determined by a Polytec pyroelectric radiometer that was calibrated and equipped with a RkP-345 detector. Progress of the photolysis was monitored by U V -visible spectral measurements with a Uvikon 860 re-cording spectrophotometer and a Zeiss P M Q II spectrometer for measurements at selected wavelengths. Results Hg(CN)2/[Fe(CN)6]4-The electronic spectrum of an aqueous solution containing Hg(CN) 2 and [Fe(CN) 6] 4" displays a new absorption band at A m a x = 265 nm (e = 2960). This band which does not belong to the components Hg(CN) 2 and [Fe(CN)4]4~ was first observed by Beck and Porzsolt in 1971 [14]. The irradiation of an aqueous solution of 0.25 M Hg(CN) 2 and 2 x l 0 _ 4 M [Fe(CN) 4] 4- into this new absorption band (A irr = 313 nm) led to the deposition of metallic mercury as a dark-grey precipitate or small shiny droplets. In addition, [Fe(CN)6]3~ was generated and recognized by its absorption maxima at 260, 300, 320 and 418 nm. The formation of [Fe(CN) 6] 3 _ was monitored by measuring the in-crease of extinction at 418 nm (s = 1050). At A i r r = 313 nm the Fe(III) complex was formed with the quantum yield 0 = 0.03. Under our experimental conditions about 70% of the incident light was absorbed by the new absorp-tion band while both components Hg(CN) 2 and [Fe(CN) 6] 4" absorbed each about 15%. Light ab-sorption by the components does not seem to inter-fere with the observed photoredox reaction of the mixture. Aqueous Hg(CN) 2 is not light-sensitive and ligand-field excitation of [Fe(CN) 6 4 _ at 313 nm leads to a photoaquation [15]. [HgCo2(CO)10]6-The absorption spectrum of [HgCo 2(CN) 1 0] 6" (Fig. 1) is dominated by a very intense long-wavelength band at A m a x = 361 nm {e = 51200) [13]. The complex is thermally stable only in alkaline solu-tion. Upon irradiation at 366 nm at p H = 13 (NaOH) a very efficient photolysis took place. The photoreaction of an argon-saturated solution was ac-companied by spectral changes (Fig. 1) which clearly indicated the formation of [Co(CN) 5] 3". This com-0,90 Fig. 1. Spectral changes during the photolysis of 1.58xlO-5M K6[HgCo2(CN)10] in argon-saturated 0.1 M NaOH at (a) 0 and (f) 40 s irradiation time, with A i r r = 366 nm and a 1 cm cell. plex is characterized by absorption maxima at 280 and 967 nm [16—18]. In addition, metallic mercury was formed as a grey precipitate. When the photoly-sis was carried out at higher concentrations of [HgCo 2(CN) 1 0] 6~ (> 10"2 M) the mercury separated as shiny droplets. The concentration of [HgCo 2(CN) 1 0] 6~ was monitored by measuring the extinction at the band maximum at 361 nm. The complex disappeared with a quantum yield of 6 = 0.36 at A i r r = 366 nm. Discussion Hg(CN)2/[Fe(CN)6]4-Beck and Porzsolt have presented convincing evi-dence that in aqueous mixtures of Hg(CN) 2 and [Fe(CN) 6] 4" polynuclear complexes of the type [ (NC) 2 HgV-NCFe n (CN) 5 ] 4 - are formed [14]. Mer-cury(II) is well known for the expansion of its co-ordination number from 2 to 3 and 4. The presence of bridging cyanide is also apparent from the IR spectrum of the solid addition compound K 4 [Fe(CN) 6 ]x3Hg(CN) 2 x4H 2 0 [12]. The C N stretching vibration of Hg(CN) 2 at 2190 cm"1 [19] and [Fe(CN) 6] 4" at about 2050 c m - 1 [19] appears also in the addition compound which, however, shows a further band at 2070 c m - 1 . This band which is blue-shifted with regard to [Fe(CN) 6] 4" is a good indica-tion for the presence of bridging cyanide [20—22]. Since the energy of the terminal cyanides is not changed by the formation of the bridged complex mercury and iron interact only weakly. The assumption that the electronic coupling of both metals of the H g n N C F e n moiety is only weak is also supported by other observations. The stability constant for the association of Hg(CN) 2 and [Fe(CN) 6] 4" is rather small (K = 240 M" 1 ) [14]. In addition the electronic spectrum of [Fe(CN)6]4~ re-mains essentially uneffected by the presence of Hg(CN) 2 with the exception of the new absorption band at A m a x = 265 nm. This new band is logically assigned to the M M C T transition from the d^ orbitals of the reducing Fe(II) to the 6 s orbital of the oxidiz-ing Hg(II). This assignment is also supported by the fact that the electronic spectra of mixtures of Hg(CN) 2 and other transition metal cyano complexes such as [Ru(CN) 6] 4~, [Mo(CN) 6] 4", [Fe(CN) 6] 3", [Mo(CN) 6] 3", [Ni(CN) 4] 2", [Rh(CN) 6] 3~, and [Pd(CN) 4] 2" display M M C T absorptions only if the transition metal is reducing (Ru(II) and Mo(IV)) [14]. In the case of [Ru(CN) 6] 4" the M M C T band occurs at Amax = 238 nm. Such a blue shift from Fe(II) to Ru(II) is expected since [Ru(CN) 6] 4" is the weaker oxidant compared with [Fe(CN) 6] 4" [23]. Upon M M C T (Fe11 to Hg1 1) excitation an aqueous mixture of Hg(CN) 2 and [Fe(CN) 6] 4" underwent a photoredox reaction according to the equation: Hg(CN) 2 + 2 [ F e ( C N ) 6 ] 4 - ^ Hg° + 2CN" + 2[Fe m (CN) 6 ] 3 " The mechanism of this reaction was not investi-gated. However, the following sequence of processes may lead to product formation: [(NC) 2 Hg n NCFe n (CN) 5 ] 4 ~ H (1) [ (NC) 2 Hg I NCFe m (CN) 5 ] 4 -[ (NC) 2 Hg I NCFe m (CN) 5 ] 4 - (2) Hg*CN + CNT + [Fe m (CN) 6 ] 3 -Hg x CN + [Fe n(CN) 6] 4" (3 a) Hg° + C N " + [Fe n(CN) 6] 3" 2 H g C N -> Hg° + Hg n (CN) 2 (3 b) Mercury(I) cyanide is not stable but could exist as a reactive intermediate [19]. It may oxidize Fe(II) (3 a) or disproportionate to Hg(0) and Hg(II) (3 b). [HgCo2(CN)10]6~ The structure of [HgCo 2(CN) 1 0] 6~ is not known. But there is little doubt that the trinuclear complex contains a linear Co—Hg—Co moiety in analogy to many other related compounds [24] including [HgCo 2(CO) 8] [25]. The metal-metal bonds are as-sumed to be polar. Consequently, the oxidation numbers Co(I) and Hg(II) can be assigned. This as-sumption is based on the following considerations. Generally, the frequency of the cyanide stretching vibration of cyano complexes decreases with decreas-ing charge of the metal ion reflecting an increased jr-back bonding in this direction. In the IR-spectra of homoleptic cobalt cyanide complexes the lowest-fre-quency C N bands appear at —2130 cm"1 for Co(III) and -2080 cm"1 for Co(II) [19]. Although [Co^CN^] 4 - or [ C o ^ C N J J 3 - seem to exist [19, 26] these complexes have never been characterized and their IR spectra are also not known. The complex [HgCo 2(CN) 1 0] 6" exhibits C N bands at 2035, 2072, 2099, and 2128 cm"1 [13]. By comparison with Co(III) and Co(II) it is then certain-ly reasonable to assign the oxidation numbers [ H ^ C o ^ C N ^ o ] 6 " . The metal-metal interaction of [HgCo 2(CN) 1 0] 6 can be explained by a qualitative M O diagram (Fig. 2). The frontier orbitals are generated by the overlap of the 6 s Hg and 3dz2 Co orbitals of the linear Co—Hg—Co moiety which is located on the z-axis. The 6s(Hg)—3dz2(Co) energy difference deter-mines the bond polarity. The 6s orbital of mercury occurs at rather high energies [27] and is certainly situated above the dz 2 orbital of Co. It follows that ó - Ó+ d-the metal—metal bond is polar: Co—Hg—Co. The bonding electron pair is then predominantly localized at both Co atoms. This description confirms also the assignment of the oxidation numbers Hg(II) and Co(I). However, in distinction to the system Hg(CN) 2/[Fe(CN) 6] 4" the electronic coupling of the metals in [HgCo 2(CN) 1 0] 6" is rather strong due to the direct orbital overlap. Fig. 2. Qualitative MO diagram of the linear C o - H g - C o moiety (D^h symmetry) of [HgCo(CN)10]6~. According to the M O scheme (Fig. 2) the lowest-energy electronic transition of [HgCo 2(CN) 1 0] 6~ from (f to a* has a M M C T contribution. Although the extent of this contribution is not known in a limiting description the o"—>cr* transition can be viewed as a Co(I) to Hg(II) M M C T transition. This M M C T transition which is allowed ( 2 u + ^ 2 g + in D o o h sym-metry) is then logically assigned to the intense long-wavelength absorption of [HgCo 2(CN) 1 0] 6~. Upon M M C T excitation an efficient photolysis takes place according to the equation: [ H g n C o ^ C N ) ^ 6 - ^ H g 0 + 2 [Co n (CN) 5 ] 3 -The mechanism of this reaction was not investi-gated. It is feasible that this stochiometry represents also the primary photoprocess which proceeds as a reductive elimination at Hg(II) in a concerted fash-ion. As an alternative the photolysis may first gener-ate intermediates which are formed by the homolytic cleavage of one Hg—Co bond: [ H ^ C o ^ C N ^ ] 6 - H [Co n (CN) 5 ] 3 - + [ H g ^ C o ^ C N ) ^ 3 -The final product formation could then take place by the thermal splitting of the second H g - C o bond: [ f V C o t C N ^ ] 3 " -> Hg° + [Co n (CN) 5 ] 3 - . Conclusion The system Hg(CN) 2/[Fe(CN) 6] 4" adds further evi-dence to the general significance of photoredox reac-tions of cyanide-bridged complexes induced by in-ner-sphere M M C T excitation. A new type of inner-sphere M M C T transition occurs in the trinuclear complex [ ( N C ) 5 C o I - H g I I - C o I ( C N ) 5 ] 6 - . In this case the reducing and oxidizing metal are connected by a direct metal—metal bond. M M C T excitation leads also to a photoredox reaction. Support of this research by the Deutsche For-schungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie is gratefully acknowledged. G . S. is indebt-ed to the Humboldt-Foundation for a fellowship. [1] N. S. Hush, Progr. Inorg. Chem. 8 , 391 (1967). [2] H. Taube, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sei. 3 1 3 , 483 (1978). [3] T. J. Meyer, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sei. 3 1 3 , 496 (1978). [4] T. J. Meyer, Acc. Chem. Res. 1 1 , 94 (1978). [5] D. Brown (ed.): Mixed-Valence Compounds, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1980). [6] C. Creutz, Progr. Inorg. Chem. 3 0 , 1 (1983). [7] D. E . Richardson and H. Taube, Coord. Chem. Rev. 6 0 , 107 (1984). [8] A. Vogler, A. H. Osman, and H. Kunkely, Coord. Chem. Rev. 6 4 , 159 (1985). [9] A. Vogler, A. H. Osman, and H. Kunkely, Inorg. Chem. 2 6 , 2337 (1987). [10] A. Vogler and H. Kunkely, J. Organomet. Chem. 3 5 5 , 1 (1988). [11] A. Vogler and H. Kunkely, Z. Naturforsch. 4 4 b , 69 (1989). [12] D. Strömholm, Z. Anorg. Chem. 8 4 , 208 (1913). [13] H. S. Lim and F. C. Anson, Inorg. Chem. 1 0 , 103 (1971). [14] M. T. Beck and E. C. Porzsolt, J. Coord. Chem. 1 , 57 (1971). [15] V. Balzani and V. Carassiti, Photochemistry of Coor-dination Compounds, Academic Press, New York (1970). [16] N. N. King and M. E. Winfield, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 8 3 , 3366 (1961). [17] J. J. Alexander and H. B. Gray, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 8 9 , 3356 (1967). [18] J. M. Pratt and R. J. P. Williams, J. Chem. Soc. A 1 9 6 7 , 1291. [19] A. G. Sharpe, The Chemistry of Cyano Complexes of the Transition Metals, Academic Press, New York (1976). [20] D. A. Dows, A. Haim, and W. K. Wilmarth, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 2 1 , 33 (1966). [21] A. Vogler and H. Kunkely, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 7 9 , 301 (1975). [22] J. Ribas and A. Escuer, Trans. Met. Chem. 1 0 , 466 (1985). [23] J. C. Curtis and T. J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem. 2 1 , 1562 (1982). [24] J. M. Burlitsch, Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, G. Wilkinson, F. G. A. Stone, and E. W. Abel (eds), Pergamon Press, Oxford, Vol. 6, 983 (1982). [25] J. M. Burlitsch and A. Ferrari, Inorg. Chem. 9 , 563 (1970). [26] T. Funabiki, H. Hosomi, S. Yoshida, and K. Tar ama, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1 0 4 , 1560 (1982). [27] L. E . Orgel, J. Chem. Soc. 1 9 5 8 , 4186. 

http://epub.uni-regensburg.de/13371/1/ubr05275_ocr.pdf

Photoredox Reactions of Hg(CN)₂/[Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ and [HgCo₂(CN)₁o]⁶⁻ induced by Inner-Sphere Metal to Metal Charge Transfer Excitation

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Regensburg Publication Server

University of Regensburg Publication Server