Hydroxide-Bridged Cubane Complexes of Nickel(II) and Cadmium(II): Magnetic, EPR, and Unusual Dynamic Properties

Abstract

The reactions of M­(ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>·<i>x</i>H<sub>2</sub>O (M = Ni­(II) or Cd­(II)) and <i>m</i>-bis­[bis­(1-pyrazolyl)­methyl]­benzene (<b>L</b><sub><b>m</b></sub>) in the presence of triethylamine lead to the formation of hydroxide-bridged cubane compounds of the formula [M<sub>4</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-OH)<sub>4</sub>(μ-<b>L</b><sub><b>m</b></sub>)<sub>2</sub>(solvent)<sub>4</sub>]­(ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>4</sub>, where solvent = dimethylformamide, water, acetone. In the solid state the metal centers are in an octahedral coordination environment, two sites are occupied by pyrazolyl nitrogens from <b>L</b><sub><b>m</b></sub>, three sites are occupied by bridging hydroxides, and one site contains a weakly coordinated solvent molecule. A series of multinuclear, two-dimensional and variable-temperature NMR experiments showed that the cadmium­(II) compound in acetonitrile-<i>d</i><sub>3</sub> has <i>C</i><sub>2</sub> symmetry and undergoes an unusual dynamic process at higher temperatures (Δ<i>G</i><sub>Lm</sub><sup>‡</sup> = 15.8 ± 0.8 kcal/mol at 25 °C) that equilibrates the pyrazolyl rings, the hydroxide hydrogens, and cadmium­(II) centers. The proposed mechanism for this process combines two motions in the semirigid <b>L</b><sub><b>m</b></sub> ligand termed the “Columbia Twist and Flip:” twisting of the pyrazolyl rings along the C<sub>pz</sub>–C<sub>methine</sub> bond and 180° ring flip of the phenylene spacer along the C<sub>Ph</sub>–C<sub>methine</sub> bond. This dynamic process was also followed using the spin saturation method, as was the exchange of the hydroxide hydrogens with the trace water present in acetonitrile-<i>d</i><sub>3</sub>. The nickel­(II) analogue, as shown by magnetic susceptibility and electron paramagnetic resonance measurements, has an <i>S</i> = 4 ground state, and the nickel­(II) centers are ferromagnetically coupled with strongly nonaxial zero-field splitting parameters. Depending on the Ni–O–Ni angles two types of interactions are observed: <i>J</i><sub>1</sub> = 9.1 cm<sup>–1</sup> (97.9 to 99.5°) and <i>J</i><sub>2</sub> = 2.1 cm<sup>–1</sup> (from 100.3 to 101.5°). “Broken symmetry” density functional theory calculations performed on a model of the nickel­(II) compound support these observations

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions